The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2009, 04:39 PM   #1
yc420
2nd Gear Member
 
yc420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2008, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: Florida
Posts: 294
Default Rear mounted vs. Underhood

Hello all,

I've been wanting to "boost" my car for quite sometime. I have finally come to the conclusion that I want to go turbo. Now I have 2 options. Either an under hood kit or a rear mounted one. If I did the under hood I have 2 other options: either do a kit or have a local shop create a custom turbo set up. I'm really stuck on whether to go with an STS rear mounted single turbo or an original under hood kit. One of the main things I'm worried about with the rear mounted kit is the fact that I live in Florida and it does rain quite a lot. I would hate for that turbo to suck water in. Also if I was to go to the track, while I'm performing my burnout I'm sure that rubber and other things that I don't want would be going into the filter which is mounted right where my mufflers are now (directly behind the rear passenger wheel). I'd like to have everyone's opinion on this.


I have a 2008 Mustang GT if that helps.


Thanks,
yc420
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
'94 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'08 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'09 Shelby GT500
yc420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 05:54 PM   #2
mygt500
Multi-Tasking Moderator!
 
mygt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Detroit Rock City!
Posts: 13,994
Default

Rear mounted will keep the engine bay and the turbo cooler. If doing rear mount go for twins......JMO
__________________

2006 Mustang GT with Cervinis Kit
Whipple Crew member
H.O. S/C 465 RWHP and 440RWTQ

First online article about my car! check it out!
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8811-Detroit-Sports-Car-Examiner~y2009m5d30-Jason-McGuires-2006-Mustang-GT

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3342086

www.mocsem.com
mygt500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 05:59 PM   #3
Rskapof
2nd Gear Member
2007 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 2007 Mustang GT
Location: FL
Posts: 172
Default

if going to the drag strip a rear mount would be less than ideal. Though the air is much cooler going into the engine (because it has so much time to cool on its way to the engine with plenty of fresh air) the turbo lag is much greater than on an under the hood set up. A FMIC with an under the hood turbo is what i would go with. The response is a lot quicker.

If you do not plan on making a huge amount of power i would stick with a turn key package super charger. a turbo would be a fantastic amount of power while still being efficient, good for road courses and street.

Plus, i love turbos because they sound so sweet.
__________________
2007 GT Tungsten Gray, Red Leather: CnL Racer Intake and Filter w/ 95mm MAF, 93 Brenspeed Tune, Bassani X-Pipe, MAC Mufflers, MGW Shifter

In Future: Griggs and Turbo
Rskapof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 06:32 PM   #4
blackcrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2007, Ford, Mustang
Location: PR
Posts: 29
Default

I've read various articles and there is no lag with the rear mounted turbos, its about the turbo sizing for the application causing the lag not the location... How are you going to use the car? weekender... dd... if you are going to spend a lot of time in traffic, underhood temps (underhood mounted) could be an issue in Florida... a correctly sized turbo should be wound up by 2500~2800 rpm with lots of rod breaking torque if you get to happy with boost... also consider the plumbing and complexity... as far as a power adder, there is nothing like turbos, and Rskapof is correct, these is no sweeeeter sound...

do your homework, its your call and enjoy!
blackcrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 06:40 PM   #5
yc420
2nd Gear Member
 
yc420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2008, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: Florida
Posts: 294
Default

The car is a daily driver. I will take it to the track maybe every 2-3 weeks. It's too fun to resist I love turbos. They've become so efficient and they get their power from waste air that's leaving the exhaust. They put very little strain on the motor unlike a supercharger that has to be run by a belt. I honestly think that if supercharging your mustang wasn't a heritage then the majority of the people would be going turbo. Not only is all of this true about a turbo but it's also cheaper than a supercharger and that's one of the key reasons why I'm going turbo. That decision is pretty much final. I'll listen to what people have to say about their superchargers but for the most part I'm pretty sure I'm going with a turbo. With an intercooler I don't think that the under hood system could get THAT hot could it? I see plenty of people with Helion kits etc. etc. and they don't seem to have problems.

The rear mounted twins are a little high on the price, plus a single is more than enough for me. Also, the only thing I'm worried about when it comes to the STS kit is the fact of it's location. Dirt and water seem to be able to access the filter and turbo almost too easily. I talked to my local shop and the owner said that when the STS kit first came out a lot of people were having problems with the turbo sucking in water and then blowing their engines. He told me that since then STS has redesigned their kits with shields and what not I believe and that he has not heard of another STS kit sucking up water after that. I believe him it's just that I'm afraid of that location. I do however love the sleeper look it would have. I'd pop the hood and the only thing people would see is a silver piping going down under the car.
__________________
'94 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'08 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'09 Shelby GT500
yc420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 07:40 PM   #6
blackcrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2007, Ford, Mustang
Location: PR
Posts: 29
Default

...cool, its sounds like you have your mind made up already, great! go for it, turbos are not cheaper by any means... more efficient, yes. it also sounds like you don't wrench at all, so the plumbing won't mater, just take good care of your tech, be careful with the hellion and lowered cars... clearance issues speed bumps, poth holes... and finally, underhood temps got nothing to do with the intercooler, its got to do with the hot tubing going to the turbo melting stuff away if not properly installed, not AIT's... have funn!!!!
blackcrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 08:06 PM   #7
Local Yokel
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 385
Default

If it were mine I would go underhood and wrap everything I could with header wrap. Too much piping back and forth with a rear mount system. This is what I would go with ...


http://powerhouse411.com/catalog/ind...products_id=50
__________________
2005 Mustang GT 5 spd.
Mods:Vortech HO, Bassani X pipe with cats, Bassani mufflers, Steeda LCA

2007 Chevy Trailblazer SS
Superchips tuned ...
Local Yokel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 08:55 PM   #8
yc420
2nd Gear Member
 
yc420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2008, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: Florida
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcrow View Post
...cool, its sounds like you have your mind made up already, great! go for it, turbos are not cheaper by any means... more efficient, yes. it also sounds like you don't wrench at all, so the plumbing won't mater, just take good care of your tech, be careful with the hellion and lowered cars... clearance issues speed bumps, poth holes... and finally, underhood temps got nothing to do with the intercooler, its got to do with the hot tubing going to the turbo melting stuff away if not properly installed, not AIT's... have funn!!!!
Well as far the research I've done, turbos have been much cheaper. I've compared them to a Whipple and either the new roush or saleen supercharger. This is according to the quotes my local shop gave me. Under hood turbo systems are still out now and I really don't think that there have been problems with the temperatures under the hood being TOO hot. I'd like it if someone with an under hood turbo kit could chime in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local Yokel View Post
If it were mine I would go underhood and wrap everything I could with header wrap. Too much piping back and forth with a rear mount system. This is what I would go with ...


http://powerhouse411.com/catalog/ind...products_id=50
Nice find. However, I'd probably go with either a custom kit that the local shop would create or have them buy a kit that's been created for our cars like Hellion, Turbonetics, etc. etc.



Oh and btw, the local shop is Revolution Performance. I don't know if any of you have heard of them..
__________________
'94 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'08 Mustang GT - 5 Speed
'09 Shelby GT500
yc420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 08:59 PM   #9
whitealexander
1st Gear Member
 
whitealexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: ford mustang
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 56
Default

i also agree that rear mount would be a good idea..
__________________
there too much great thing in life, lighten up.[img]http://******************/images/85690f81aadc1749175c187784afc9ee.gif[/img]
whitealexander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 09:02 PM   #10
AmericanSpeed
4th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,786
Default

Where in FL are you at?

I have a friend with an LS1 GTO that has a rear mounted STS. I've never heard him have any troubles with rain here in FL. The only thing I hear him complain about is traction.
__________________
05 Redfire GT: WHIPPLE HO @ 10psi, VMP dyno tune & other goodies - stock block, stock exhaust, stock 3.55s
11.324 @ 121.84 w/ 1.627
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlBxdF5IqFM
11.36 @ 122.72 w/ 1.663
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoGf6DiMVk4
Previous runs:
CAI+tune only 12.877 @ 106.79 w/ 1.819
CAI+tune+suspension 12.783 @ 108.05 w/ 1.841
both on stock tires
Please do not link companies in your sig
AmericanSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
lag, mount, muffler, rear, shelby, sucking, tips, turbo, uneven, water

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company