The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2009, 04:15 PM   #1
cummins cowboy
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 07 gt
Location: utah
Posts: 158
Default N/A vs SC'd power loss at altitude??

I heard mention by a couple people that a vehicle that runs a SC looses less power at high altitude, lets say you have a super charged mustang that is putting out 500 HP at the crank, then you have say a N/A Z06 corvette that is also running 500 hp at the crank. how much power loss do you think both cars would have at say 5000 ft,
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
cummins cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 08:45 PM   #2
jahudso2
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,204
Send a message via AIM to jahudso2
Default

its all about barometric pressure. the maximum amount of pressure in the intake manifold of a naturally aspirated car is the outside pressure. The higher altitude you go, the less air pressure, and the less oxygen you get in the intake. turbocharged cars will still make around the same amount of boost no matter what the altitude is so the intake manifold pressure will not drop as much if you are at a higher altitude.
__________________
2008 GT Manual
JBA Ceramic Shorties
Pypes O/R H-Pipe
Corsa Axle-back
FRPP 3.73s
D-Specs
Stillen Sways
J&M LCAs

Join us in the NC Mustangs Social Group.

Last edited by jahudso2; 05-14-2009 at 05:21 AM.
jahudso2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 09:27 PM   #3
sleepless
 
sleepless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cummins cowboy View Post
I heard mention by a couple people that a vehicle that runs a SC looses less power at high altitude, lets say you have a super charged mustang that is putting out 500 HP at the crank, then you have say a N/A Z06 corvette that is also running 500 hp at the crank. how much power loss do you think both cars would have at say 5000 ft,
The loss will be the same since a supercharger has a fixed boost level based on the pulley size. Of course you could put on a smaller pulley to compensate; the N/A car is out of luck.
__________________
Pete

2008 Shelby GT | 08SGT0567 | FRPP Hot Rod Cams| Steeda Front and Rear Control Arm Relocation Kits, Bump Steer Kit | Granatelli Camber Ajusters | BMR Billet LCA, Panhard Rod and Brace | Koni Struts and Shocks
sleepless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 11:44 PM   #4
AmericanSpeed
4th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,786
Default

get nitrous, you are bringing your own air
__________________
05 Redfire GT: WHIPPLE HO @ 10psi, VMP dyno tune & other goodies - stock block, stock exhaust, stock 3.55s
11.324 @ 121.84 w/ 1.627
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlBxdF5IqFM
11.36 @ 122.72 w/ 1.663
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoGf6DiMVk4
Previous runs:
CAI+tune only 12.877 @ 106.79 w/ 1.819
CAI+tune+suspension 12.783 @ 108.05 w/ 1.841
both on stock tires
Please do not link companies in your sig
AmericanSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:49 AM   #5
grampa_stang
4th Gear Member
 
grampa_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2007 GT Coupe
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,237
Default

According to the NHRA correction factor. If a N/A car loses 1 second, and F/I car only loses .5. So, up at altitude, us N/A cars really have a disadvantage againt the FI guys ie: STI's and Evos.

See this link: http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/altitude.html and scroll down...you'll see this

NOTE: Supercharged and/or turbocharged cars (i.e.: AA/A, AA/AT, BB/A, BB/AT, A/PM and AA/PM) use half factor; TA/D and TA/FC cars are not factored.

bottom line is yes...they only lose 50% of what us NA guys lose
__________________

'07 GT - AT / IUP / Charcoal int / Carbon fiber dash
JLT / SCT Xcal 2 / Bama 91 Race / Eibach Pro / 3.73's
Tint / Shorty / Sequentials / Cervinis side louvers
BFG G-Force SS A/S P255/45-18 / ADR Wheels
BoomTube Crew Member
13.66 @ 100 (DA 4300')

Last edited by grampa_stang; 05-14-2009 at 11:02 AM.
grampa_stang is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
altitude, altitudes, car, cars, high, higher, hp, lose, loses, losing, loss, na, power, sc, supercharger, turbocharged

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company