The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2009, 09:42 PM   #11
AmericanSpeed
4th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,786
Default

Go by the rear tire size to calibrate the speedo on a staggered setup.

Ever do a burnout? Your car isn't moving, except for your back tires, yet the speedo will show a mph (thats why everyone tells you to do your burnout at around 55mph in 2nd gear).
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
05 Redfire GT: WHIPPLE HO @ 10psi, VMP dyno tune & other goodies - stock block, stock exhaust, stock 3.55s
11.324 @ 121.84 w/ 1.627
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlBxdF5IqFM
11.36 @ 122.72 w/ 1.663
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoGf6DiMVk4
Previous runs:
CAI+tune only 12.877 @ 106.79 w/ 1.819
CAI+tune+suspension 12.783 @ 108.05 w/ 1.841
both on stock tires
Please do not link companies in your sig
AmericanSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 11:34 PM   #12
302me
2nd Gear Member
 
302me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 205
Default

"Actually, such a force doesn't exist. Try reading a physics manual next time."


Hey Will Hunting, maybe you can tone it down a bit. A common mistake and really not a big deal. You have a very well writen definition of, "centrifugal force", but your delivery needs a little work Jr. Remember it's the internet no one cares how big you think your IQ is.

Just my 2 cents on what I thought was an unneccessay comment, not starting any battles.
__________________
06 GT/Eibach Pro-Springs/Hurst STS/AVIC D3 w/ XM radio./Sequential Tail lights, CDC window Louvers/FRPP Stingers, Pypes LT's w/ O/R H-pipe, Centerforce duel friction clutch, GTS Ram Air hood, CDC classic chin spoiler.


Coming Soon:
4:10 gears
Stroker Kit
302me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 05:54 AM   #13
MTAS
2nd Gear Member
 
MTAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: Plant City FL
Posts: 349
Default

Use the manufacturer's web site
__________________
Dave

2005 Mineral Gray Mustang GT: Plain, clean and simple. Wrapped up nice and tight.

JLT, DiabloSport, Eibach, Toyo, FRPP, BMR, Hooker, MAC, Hurst, MRT
MTAS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 11:33 AM   #14
1morepart
4th Gear Member
 
1morepart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 2008 S197GT
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,778
Default

according to the manufacturer, my stock 235/50/18 bfg's are 769-770......is this right?
j
1morepart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 12:51 PM   #15
157db
Got Troy'd
 
157db's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2007 Pony Package
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1morepart View Post
according to the manufacturer, my stock 235/50/18 bfg's are 769-770......is this right?
j
740
Wrap a tape measurer around them and divide
63360 by the circumfrence in inches.
Thats the true revs/mile.
__________________
NON PUMKIN JACKER
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boozshey View Post
Oh yeah, I forgot Norm was God on here.
Give me a break!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson View Post
<rises to the bait>
. . . Definitely not God.
Norm
157db is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 01:28 PM   #16
rford426
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: OK&TX
Posts: 1,790
Default

^^^157db with something usefull....

first time for everything
__________________

2005 Black GT Manual
Steeda CAI-SCT XCAL-Pypes O/R X pipe-Pypes Mid Mounted M80s-Red Top OPTIMA-HurstSTS-Tein Tech S-AVIC f900bt-Back up Camera-20" Black Chrome FR500s-GT500 FRONT/REAR-Factory GT500 6k HIDS-3k HID Gt500 fogs-
303rwhp/319tq
rford426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 08:20 AM   #17
MTAS
2nd Gear Member
 
MTAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: Plant City FL
Posts: 349
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 157db View Post
740
Wrap a tape measurer around them and divide
63360 by the circumfrence in inches.
Thats the true revs/mile.
Why would it be such a drastic difference from the manufacturer's site?
__________________
Dave

2005 Mineral Gray Mustang GT: Plain, clean and simple. Wrapped up nice and tight.

JLT, DiabloSport, Eibach, Toyo, FRPP, BMR, Hooker, MAC, Hurst, MRT
MTAS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 08:49 AM   #18
28HopUp
MF Administrator
1985 Ford Mustang
 
28HopUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Vehicle: Classic SSP S197
Location: Newark, DE USA
Posts: 6,261
Send a message via AIM to 28HopUp
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAS View Post
Why would it be such a drastic difference from the manufacturer's site?
Because wrapping a tape measure around the tire and dividing that into the measured mile is NOT the correct way to calculate the tire revs per mile. A tire's contact patch will throw off the calculation, so you have to use the manufacturer's published number. If the tire company doesn't publish a number for your particular tire, then you are better off using the number from a different company for the same size tire (not the best choice, but better than guessing).

Using 157db's method will result in your speedo being off. But here's the question - If the correct number is 770, but you plug in 740 into your handheld tuner, will be speedo be reading faster or slower than you are actually traveling? I know the answer, but I just wanted to give you something to think about this morning.
__________________

1985 SSP Mustang - California Highway Patrol Unit #E408395

We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams - Willie Wonka
28HopUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:25 AM   #19
MTAS
2nd Gear Member
 
MTAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: Plant City FL
Posts: 349
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by 28HopUp View Post
Because wrapping a tape measure around the tire and dividing that into the measured mile is NOT the correct way to calculate the tire revs per mile. A tire's contact patch will throw off the calculation, so you have to use the manufacturer's published number. If the tire company doesn't publish a number for your particular tire, then you are better off using the number from a different company for the same size tire (not the best choice, but better than guessing).

Using 157db's method will result in your speedo being off. But here's the question - If the correct number is 770, but you plug in 740 into your handheld tuner, will be speedo be reading faster or slower than you are actually traveling? I know the answer, but I just wanted to give you something to think about this morning.
That kind of thinking makes my head hurt and I even took physics in college but that was a LONG time ago I completely agree with using the manufacturer's web site as a reference when changing the revs/mile with a tuner. FWIW, I recently switched from Nitto 555 295/45/18 to Toyo Proxes ST II of the same size, and the revs/mile each manufacturer listed on their web site was different (only by 1 rev/mile, but I want the speedo to read as accurate as possible), so I adjusted accordingly with my Predator
__________________
Dave

2005 Mineral Gray Mustang GT: Plain, clean and simple. Wrapped up nice and tight.

JLT, DiabloSport, Eibach, Toyo, FRPP, BMR, Hooker, MAC, Hurst, MRT
MTAS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:37 AM   #20
157db
Got Troy'd
 
157db's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2007 Pony Package
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 9,114
Default

OK, then measure out 63360 inches on a straight road
and drive from zero inches to 63360 inches and count
the amount of times the tire rotates 360 degrees.
Do this at 20MPH, 30MPH, 40MPH, 50MPH, 60MPH,
70MPH, 80MPH, 90MPH, 100MPH and finally 110MPH.
Add up the totals and average them.
Hows that for a way to get the revs/mile exactly for
any particular tire at any particular load and air pressure.
Jesss, split a few hairs next time....
What me give useful info? Never.
Just here to bug the crap out of everyone.
__________________
NON PUMKIN JACKER
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boozshey View Post
Oh yeah, I forgot Norm was God on here.
Give me a break!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson View Post
<rises to the bait>
. . . Definitely not God.
Norm
157db is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
17s, 20, 2553520, calculator, gt, hour, mile, miles, mustang, revmile, revolutions, revs, speed, tire, tires

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company