Whipple or Roushcharger - Page 2

loots06 · 07-13-2009, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tylus0

I am a huge fan of the Roush.

I had a RoushCharger that I installed on my 2006 F-150 with 5.4 3v

very very fun. I know lots of guys running 550 crank HP (about 400-450 RWHP...lots of drivetrain loss in the F-150) with tune + 8 PSI + exhaust...I know it's comparing Apples to Oranges...but the Roush can put out some power easily.

Overall, the Whipple will make more HP...but it costs more money up front. A RoushCharger is a great cheap way to have alot of fun for a daily driver.

I like twins...the twins will rock your world. Whipple would be the way to go.

This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!

MiketheCalamity · 07-13-2009, 10:17 PM

Two more questions. Are the Ford Racing s/c and Whipple s/c the same thing? Second, my car is automatic will the supercharger work/fit?

onederful100 · 07-13-2009, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiketheCalamity

Two more questions. Are the Ford Racing s/c and Whipple s/c the same thing? Second, my car is automatic will the supercharger work/fit?

yes, they are the same. and it will work w/ auto.

MiketheCalamity · 07-13-2009, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onederful100

yes, they are the same. and it will work w/ auto.

It'll work regardless of the "Fits 2005-2006 Mustang GT with MANUAL transmission." on the Ford Racing website? I was talking about the 550hp FR s/c.

S281 E · 07-14-2009, 08:39 AM

If you want to compare th etop of the line models Roush (TVS) and whipple (3.1) I would do the whipple all day long.