Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.10 vs. 3.73 ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2005, 09:39 PM
  #21  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: 4.10 vs. 3.73 ???

busted? i was comparing 3.73 to 4.10 like i thought you were. you should just stop posting. you're not helping your case. you quoted what i told him to get. i said to get 4.10 and that the 05 had 3.55 stock. how is that comparing 3.73 to 3.55 and 4.10 to 3.55? ok, i think i'm actually getting dumber replying. this should be it. love ya!
nanaki is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 09:56 PM
  #22  
Nickdotcom
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Nickdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 245
Default RE: 4.10 vs. 3.73 ???

Man you guys, i was just wondering the differences between the 2 ratios so i would know what to buy, that was answered long ago so just let the thread die. P.S. nanaki probly gave the most help out of all of you.
Nickdotcom is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 10:58 PM
  #23  
Phillyblunt474
2nd Gear Member
 
Phillyblunt474's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 328
Default RE: 4.10 vs. 3.73 ???


ORIGINAL: HubbaHubba
If you think converting from 3.55 to 4.10 will not effect gas mileage you are on crack!! I don't care how you drive it.
I recall a most that JD made where he posted the gas mileage from his road trip with highway driving using his 4.10s, and his gas mileage wasnt bad at all. Maybe 1 or 2 miles beloew what you got before, but thats nothing big, and if you drice it right your not gonna be gettin that bad of mileage, JD proved that wit his logs of mileage he posted.
Phillyblunt474 is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 06:24 PM
  #24  
baseballallstarkg
 
baseballallstarkg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
Default RE: 4.10 vs. 3.73

I am also thinking about putting 4.10s in my 2000 Mustang GT auto trans...but Is it a significant loss is gas mileage?
baseballallstarkg is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 06:25 PM
  #25  
baseballallstarkg
 
baseballallstarkg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
Default

well never mind I guess I should've read more lol
1-2 isn't that bad...well worth it from what i hear
baseballallstarkg is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 06:38 PM
  #26  
stags
3rd Gear Member
 
stags's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: California, Colorado
Posts: 695
Default

To chime in for the sixxers in the crowd-

GTs come with a stock 8.8" rear end where as pre 2010 V6s have a 7.5" rear. IF anyone with a V6 wants to do gears and serious power adders, id highly recommend they buy a complete rear end assembly including a 8.8" rear to handle the extra power.
stags is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
stealth_GT
The Racers Bench
4
09-22-2015 02:19 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM
Darien
2005-2014 Mustangs
6
09-16-2015 09:30 AM



Quick Reply: 4.10 vs. 3.73 ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.