Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mustang vs. Camaro - article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2005, 01:11 PM
  #1  
GWFoos
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GWFoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 466
Default Mustang vs. Camaro - article

Check this out from Edmunds.com:

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...90362&DARTmail
GWFoos is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 01:30 PM
  #2  
SilverR1_04
2nd Gear Member
 
SilverR1_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern Cali - IE
Posts: 468
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

Awesome read.

I feel the Camaro was junk after 1970...
SilverR1_04 is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 01:36 PM
  #3  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

So basically, according to the article, insurance rates killed the f-body. I never understood why people would buy a performance car that didn't have much performance. Hell, the '93 LT1 still puts down nearly as much hp/tq as the '05 GT does. My old "outdated" pushrod LS1 embarrases them.

Oh well, I guess it's an image thing.
98LS1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 02:04 PM
  #4  
badtzmaru
4th Gear Member
 
badtzmaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,657
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

It is sad that chevy(Camaro) makers did not keep up with the times and people's demands. I love Mustangs but I also understand that the "maro has history too alongside the stang. I think they should bring back the 'maro and the chicken hawks.......it would suck just to see mustangs everywhere.............we need some good competition and more american muscle! my 2 cents......[sm=americanasmiley.gif]
badtzmaru is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 02:36 PM
  #5  
luv_the_stang
1st Gear Member
 
luv_the_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 80
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

Awesome read.

I feel the Camaro was junk after 1970...



so do i
but least the camaro never had a 4 banger like the stang did lol

i feel the stang was all junk after 70 till now

now at last after 40 years they made a sweetttttttt ride

thank god

luv_the_stang is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 02:37 PM
  #6  
05stangawsomecar
 
05stangawsomecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 26
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article


ORIGINAL: 98LS1

So basically, according to the article, insurance rates killed the f-body. I never understood why people would buy a performance car that didn't have much performance. Hell, the '93 LT1 still puts down nearly as much hp/tq as the '05 GT does. My old "outdated" pushrod LS1 embarrases them.

Oh well, I guess it's an image thing.

1993
An all-new fourth-generation Camaro was introduced. Though similar in size to the '92 model, Camaro had an all-new interior and exterior. Every model included dual air bags (a Chevrolet first), a conventional glove box, and analog instrument displays and tachometer. The V6 engine increased from 240 hp. to 260 hp. The V8 was now rated at 275 hp. and was standard in the Z28.

Ya I guess 275hp is the same as 300hp, Comparing a "old" Camaro to a new mustang is like comparing a grape and a raisen.
05stangawsomecar is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 02:40 PM
  #7  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

The old LT1's put down around 255rwhp bone stock. Not every car is rated true to the hp output. My car is rated at 305hp and it put down 325rwhp with a set of headers and a CAI through an automatic. I guess I had a -% drivetrain loss?

I've seen most '05GT's run from 13.8-14.2....right on par with an LT1.
98LS1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 03:15 PM
  #8  
05stangawsomecar
 
05stangawsomecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 26
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

ORIGINAL: luv_the_stang

Awesome read.

I feel the Camaro was junk after 1970...



so do i
but least the camaro never had a 4 banger like the stang did lol

i feel the stang was all junk after 70 till now

now at last after 40 years they made a sweetttttttt ride

thank god

1982
The third generation Camaro was launched in the fall of 1981 as an '82 model. Motor Trend magazine awarded the Camaro "Car of the Year." For the first time in Camaro history, a 4-cylindar engine was available in the Sport Coupe. The all-new body styling was futuristic - looking like nothing else on the road! The body now featured "hatch" styling rather than a traditional trunk. Models included the Sport Coupe, Berlinetta, and Z28. By the end of the '82 model year, production totaled 189,747 units.

Um, yes they did make a pathetic 4 banger, it was the slowest production car ever I think, LOL
05stangawsomecar is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 03:32 PM
  #9  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

ORIGINAL: 05stangawsomecar


ORIGINAL: 98LS1

So basically, according to the article, insurance rates killed the f-body. I never understood why people would buy a performance car that didn't have much performance. Hell, the '93 LT1 still puts down nearly as much hp/tq as the '05 GT does. My old "outdated" pushrod LS1 embarrases them.

Oh well, I guess it's an image thing.

1993
An all-new fourth-generation Camaro was introduced. Though similar in size to the '92 model, Camaro had an all-new interior and exterior. Every model included dual air bags (a Chevrolet first), a conventional glove box, and analog instrument displays and tachometer. The V6 engine increased from 240 hp. to 260 hp. The V8 was now rated at 275 hp. and was standard in the Z28.

Ya I guess 275hp is the same as 300hp, Comparing a "old" Camaro to a new mustang is like comparing a grape and a raisen.
Wow...where did that come from??? last time i checked the fastest the v6 camaro ever got was 200 hp
tightdogal is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 03:53 PM
  #10  
FuzzyRag
1st Gear Member
 
FuzzyRag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 72
Default RE: Mustang vs. Camaro - article

yeah, the 01 v6 with its slightly different exhaust manifold got a extra 5 hp, but they weren't rated over 200hp from what I heard.
FuzzyRag is offline  


Quick Reply: Mustang vs. Camaro - article



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.