Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How is this possible... and how to duplicate the results?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2009, 08:47 AM
  #21  
grampa_stang
4th Gear Member
 
grampa_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,249
Default

Another thing that matters with the auto are the shift points. What RPM is it shifting at?
With my Bama tune..the default shift point was at 5900 rpm. I had him write me a new tune to shift at 6250. That got me 2/10ths or so.
grampa_stang is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 01:05 PM
  #22  
AmericanSpeed
5th Gear Member
 
AmericanSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,031
Default

Tune would be the first thing, track prep is another. What do the rest of the slips look like? Just because you have an auto doesn't mean the same things are happening, especially when running on street tires as you just can't jam the peddle down to the floor and hook up. Yes, you may have had a better 60' time, but what about after that? You can surely blow the tires up after 60' depending on how you moderate the gas, or even bog down. Maybe after 60' you started spinning and the auto short shifted? Who knows, so much can happen on stock street tires. Just because you 60' well, doesn't mean you 330' well.

There was a lot of other good points already brought up as well, no need for me to repeat them.
AmericanSpeed is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 01:25 PM
  #23  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

The other time that day was a 13.168 @ 105 MPH, but not a good 60'. It would have been a better run than the 13.082 (if it wasn't for the worse 60') because the DA was a little over 200 ft lower and there was a 4 mph tail wind.

I guess that could be true about the 330', but the car usually seems to hook right away. I really don't think I'm spinning much farther than the 60' mark.
gburke1 is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 02:22 PM
  #24  
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
 
Mishri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helena, MT
Posts: 3,780
Default

How low on gas were you? that can be a huge weight savings, as well as removing the spare/jack.. I didn't see them mentioning it but maybe they felt it didn't need mentioning. and teh shaker 1000 like you said.. 1/10th in weight savings just from gas/driver weight/shaker easy.. sounds like Justin already has like a 70lbs weight savings even if you were both on E in gas..
Mishri is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 04:47 PM
  #25  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

I forgot that this was also with my jack/spare tire removed. I think I had a half tank or less but it's been since November that I did that run.
gburke1 is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 11:54 PM
  #26  
1morepart
4th Gear Member
 
1morepart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by deekum1627
every car is goin to be diff man, also i like that cai more and more i should of got that one instead of my racer
d, you should have bought the street c&l or the bullitt?
1morepart is offline  
Old 03-26-2009, 12:02 AM
  #27  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

just blast it w/ a 100 shot and call it a day
you can rack your brains all day long thinking about it, but its easier to just make more power!
onederful100 is offline  
Old 03-26-2009, 12:18 AM
  #28  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

I think after all the information that has been put out there, we can attribute the difference to 4 main things:

*Better Air
*Better Track Prep
*Tune (more timing, possibly better tuner)
*Less Weight

Maybe the best way to approach this...

Is there anyone else that has ran 12's with a CAI+Tune Auto GT? I think everyone is well aware that it's been done with a Manual by many people so no need to post those runs.

Last edited by gburke1; 03-26-2009 at 12:21 AM.
gburke1 is offline  
Old 03-26-2009, 02:24 AM
  #29  
dkersten
2nd Gear Member
 
dkersten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 462
Default

If your ambient temp was lower (50 degrees?) and your car was sitting for a while, the oil viscosity in your trans, engine, and rear end could have made up the difference in power right there..
Adding higher octane gas doesnt do anything if you dont have the tune to take advantage..
Track conditions can account for HUGE differences.. and ambient temp can greatly affect the traction of the stock tires (harder rubber and colder, slicker track).
If he iced his intake on a warmer day, he could have compensated for the intake temp difference and had superior traction.

Plus everything that everyone else said..
I have seen people post 12.65 times here on bolt on mods.. and I am convinced that the best bolt on HP you can get might hit mid 340's at the flywheel.

Oh, and you can easily have upwards of 30-40hp difference on stock engines right out of the factory.. maybe he got lucky and his pre-mod hp was 310 or 320.. ? anything is possible.. only way to tell is go head to head with him..
dkersten is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gene K
S197 Handling Section
1
10-21-2015 11:37 PM
TCStangerv6
Street/Strip
12
10-11-2015 05:57 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM
2015Ecoboost
New Member Area
3
09-17-2015 01:48 PM
robjh22
Suspension
0
09-08-2015 12:47 PM



Quick Reply: How is this possible... and how to duplicate the results?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.