Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

98 trans am vs 2005 mustang gt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2010, 12:26 PM
  #1  
luis05gt
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
luis05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 143
Default 98 trans am vs 2005 mustang gt

me and my friend are gonna run them today he has a stock 98 trans am auto what are my chances the only thing i got is a short shifter and a new clutch also some nito 555
does anybody know the weight and hp numbers on the trans am i keep getting diffrent numbers
luis05gt is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

All else being equal, it all boils down to the weight to HP ratio as you imply. Maybe the TA's engine heat soaks as bad as our S197's to help you out.

Sorry, but I'm at work and can't go hunting the numbers.
Nuke is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 01:13 PM
  #3  
SUP3R D4VE
1st Gear Member
 
SUP3R D4VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 110
Default

let us know how it goes...i think you should have him but not sure. I raced a 97 z28 and won so you should be fine.
SUP3R D4VE is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 01:54 PM
  #4  
ronniegibson1978
2nd Gear Member
 
ronniegibson1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tn.
Posts: 347
Default

honestly...he should win...those cars dyno at like 300 to 310 to the wheels on auto's...plus they weight like a couple hundred lbs lighter
ronniegibson1978 is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 01:56 PM
  #5  
ronniegibson1978
2nd Gear Member
 
ronniegibson1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tn.
Posts: 347
Default

a stock ta in 98 was rated at like 305 hp but they were seriously underrated from factory and they weight like 3200 to 3300 lbs...GM did a heck of a job of selling that car as de-tuned vette...but they're a monster
ronniegibson1978 is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 02:17 PM
  #6  
Lupo222
2nd Gear Member
 
Lupo222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 470
Default

The T/As/Camaro's with those LT1s are pretty damn awesome cars. I hate to say it. The guy at the shop I goto has a 95 Z28 with nothing but aggressive *** cams and he runs 12.5s all day long on street tires.

You may have him though. I ran a bolt-on WS6 with intake/exhaust/cams/gears and Drag Radials when my NSX had nothing but headers/Exhaust/intake and I beat him pretty bad. But my NSX was makin 280 to the wheels and only weighed 2200lbs...

Good luck! let us know how it goes!
Lupo222 is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:42 PM
  #7  
07BLACKGT
5th Gear Member
 
07BLACKGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,935
Default

If he manually shifts, he'll get you from a roll easy.

Run him from a dig and make sure you can launch and you should be good.

oh and... take videos :]
07BLACKGT is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:45 PM
  #8  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

only 1 way to find out
when the green light drops the bs stops
onederful100 is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:49 PM
  #9  
Mpaint99
2nd Gear Member
 
Mpaint99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 415
Default

I know mine is modded, but I lhave left every TA standing still. As to the comment about Auto vs stick your - never mind not worth talking about again and again.
Mpaint99 is offline  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:58 PM
  #10  
torque_is_good
2nd Gear Member
 
torque_is_good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 334
Default

the 98 is the first year for the LS1 and yes, the factory understated the power. THe 93-97's had the LT1.



But, here is the difference. The car is 12 years old. If it's never been rebuilt, then it's tired. You can't compare honestly but you should take the tired car.

I'm not hating because I own both vehicles but I do applaud Ford for bumping up the v6 and launching the new 5.0 for 2011. it's pathetic that my rebuilt 95 maro outperforms my 2007 stang.
I also have a 95 Z and the LT1 engine and with bolt ons and 1.6 rr's, she goes and the low end torque is better than the stang. 70 cubic inches makes a difference.

If the engine was the LS1 (like that 98 will have) and had the same mods that my LT1 does, WHP would be 320-330, maybe more.

Again, I would still say you because unless it's been rebuilt, the car is tired
torque_is_good is offline  


Quick Reply: 98 trans am vs 2005 mustang gt



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.