Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MPGs on my Virginia to Florida trip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2010, 12:58 PM
  #21  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel60
My mustang shop saids 50 lbs of air . . .
They are flat-out wrong. Period.


I'll get to the rest shortly.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 01:31 PM
  #22  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel60
O.k. I'm going to the mountains tomorrow and this is my question. When I got my car she had this rubber on her 255/55/17s' and now she has 255/45/18s' with a 10x9 rims. What air pressure should I put in her? My mustang shop saids 50 lbs of air where as my place of work saids the same as the door jam saids even if she is a different tire.
Are you sure that the tire size was 255/55-17? Reason I ask is because 235/55-17 is the stock 17" size and 255/50-17 is the usual 17" "upgrade".

So I'll start from what I do know - that the 235/50-18 is door-stickered for 32 psi front and rear.

Your new 255/45-18's are two load ranges bigger, meaning that they don't need quite as much air in them as the OE 235/50-18 in order to be at the same rated load.

Near as I can figure, there's about 3 psi difference between the 235/50-18 and the 255/45-18 for developing the same rated load. In theory, that means you could run the 255/45-18's at 29/29 psi (front/rear) for normal everyday driving that doesn't include much unusually hard cornering. That's based on assuming you'd be generally happy with Ford's specs for their 235/50 tires.

But . . . on this trip you're evidently going to be doing some cornering that's likely to be more than "moderately hard" at times. Generally that means slightly more air in order to stiffen the tire against cornering loads. It also means that you might want to stagger the pressures front to rear a little.

For the enthusiastic-driving part of this trip I'd strongly consider running 32 or 33 psi up front and about 3 psi less in the rear. Less pressure in the rears will tend to dial out some of the understeer, and while doing so give your rear tires more mechanical grip (translation: less sensitive to having road roughness get the back end loose).


Be kind of careful about adding throttle as you exit the corners - you probably won't know where the apex for every corner is, and it's entirely possible to add too much throttle too soon. Ease into the throttle and leave yourself plenty of margin. Corners and blind turns may keep turning further than you expected.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 01:45 PM
  #23  
07 Showstopper
2nd Gear Member
 
07 Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 182
Default

Mustangmaster, thats great mpg! My mpgs are taking a dump lately. I have a Bamachips 87 octane tune and at first I was getting 24 mpg as compared to 21 without it. I was thrilled! Then now I'm getting 17mpg driving the same highway route. So you are getting way better gas milage than me for sure lol
07 Showstopper is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 04:11 PM
  #24  
Mustangmaster
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Mustangmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lewisetta, Virginia
Posts: 788
Default

07 Showstopper, I seem to get the best MPGs when I run the Brenspeed 91 tune running 93 octane ethanol free gas.

Daniel60, when I bought my new Goodyear tires that hold a max PSI of 51, I emailed Goodyear and they said stick with what the door sticker says....32 PSI.
Mustangmaster is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 04:58 PM
  #25  
07 Showstopper
2nd Gear Member
 
07 Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 182
Default

wow thats interesting...ill have to try that out soon cuz 17mpgs is not cutting it for a sixxer
07 Showstopper is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 08:57 AM
  #26  
Daniel60
5th Gear Member
 
Daniel60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Small walk way by big walk way
Posts: 4,717
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
Are you sure that the tire size was 255/55-17? Reason I ask is because 235/55-17 is the stock 17" size and 255/50-17 is the usual 17" "upgrade".

So I'll start from what I do know - that the 235/50-18 is door-stickered for 32 psi front and rear.

Your new 255/45-18's are two load ranges bigger, meaning that they don't need quite as much air in them as the OE 235/50-18 in order to be at the same rated load.

Near as I can figure, there's about 3 psi difference between the 235/50-18 and the 255/45-18 for developing the same rated load. In theory, that means you could run the 255/45-18's at 29/29 psi (front/rear) for normal everyday driving that doesn't include much unusually hard cornering. That's based on assuming you'd be generally happy with Ford's specs for their 235/50 tires.

But . . . on this trip you're evidently going to be doing some cornering that's likely to be more than "moderately hard" at times. Generally that means slightly more air in order to stiffen the tire against cornering loads. It also means that you might want to stagger the pressures front to rear a little.

For the enthusiastic-driving part of this trip I'd strongly consider running 32 or 33 psi up front and about 3 psi less in the rear. Less pressure in the rears will tend to dial out some of the understeer, and while doing so give your rear tires more mechanical grip (translation: less sensitive to having road roughness get the back end loose).


Be kind of careful about adding throttle as you exit the corners - you probably won't know where the apex for every corner is, and it's entirely possible to add too much throttle too soon. Ease into the throttle and leave yourself plenty of margin. Corners and blind turns may keep turning further than you expected.


Norm
235/55-17 is the stock 17" size and 255/50-17 is the usual 17" "upgrade".


Your right it was 235/55/17s' I forgot.
Daniel60 is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 12:01 PM
  #27  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson

...You can't do that when you're in neutral; you're riding in a glorified downhill soapbox racer at that point...

Norm
ROFLMAO! Norm, that made my day!
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 12:05 PM
  #28  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by Mustangmaster
If I remember right, coasting in neutral vs leaving in gear going down hills has been discussed here before. I think most people decided it was better to go neutral because brakes cost less to replace than transmissions.
As for saving fuel and increasing MPG by neutral coasting, I am not sure I follow you. How would it cheaper to replace breaks than it is to replace the tranny?

Not trying to be sarcastic, just honestly am curious how a tranny would be cheaper.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 12:25 PM
  #29  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by shad2009
Then my car lied to me...all i know is when i filled my tank it read 400+ miles to empty, and when i went for a refill it was over 400 miles driven and i still could have driven longer, and the avg mpg read over 30...either way, i got really good mileage and was happy
I think your car 'puter lied to you. The only way you can get over 30MPG from a 4.6 with stock gears and overdrive is if you actually took the car out of gear and coasted downhill at over 80 MPH
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 11-04-2010, 03:31 PM
  #30  
Daniel60
5th Gear Member
 
Daniel60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Small walk way by big walk way
Posts: 4,717
Default

I drove to Asheville, N.C from Charleston, South Carolina and couldn't acquire any non-ethanol fuel on the way and back but got decent fuel mileage considering I have 4.10 gears and few bolt-ons.' First Tank I drove 189.3 miles and averaged 21.6 miles per gallon and this includes three or four fly byes at 120 mph on idiots on pissed me off on the interstate. Second Tank I drove 164.8 miles and averaged 21.3 miles per gallon. Third Tank I drove 141.5 miles and average 19.2 in the city and on the Blue Ridge Parkway and the final tankful I got cheap and filled up with 87 octane and drove back on the interstate from Asheville, North Carolina to Charleston, South Carolina and average 22.4 with a few fly byes. Speeds average mostly 75 on the interstate and 30-55 in the city and parkway. Car drove like a race car with strut tower brace and again if you haven't had any suspension parts added to your car this would be the most beneficial in my humble opinion.
Daniel60 is offline  


Quick Reply: MPGs on my Virginia to Florida trip



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.