Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aluminum Driveshaft making a difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 06:51 AM
  #11  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

Making something more robust doesn't always make it faster.
Nuke is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:04 AM
  #12  
timmbo
3rd Gear Member
 
timmbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 671
Default

I have the Shaftmasters 1 piece direct bolt in and love it. These guys know what they are doing and its a very well made shaft. No vibration issues whatsoever.
timmbo is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:17 AM
  #13  
hawkeye18
3rd Gear Member
 
hawkeye18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 627
Default

Originally Posted by 908ssp
It is weird. When Ford does something the cheap way you guys are quick to defend it. but when Ford spends three times as much money on something you want to remove it. Ford would have put a "one piece" [it is not really one piece at all] drive shaft on if they didn't cause more problems then the benefit of putting on a three bearing shaft. Ford doesn't spend money just to make the car slow.
Ford also has to worry about fixing NVH for the 98th percentile driver, and warranty issues. Ford is more concerned about making a quiet driveshaft that will last at least through the warranty than they are about extracting every HP. That's what models like the Boss are for.
hawkeye18 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:56 AM
  #14  
SCCAGT
3rd Gear Member
 
SCCAGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 960
Default

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke
I have heard from some that the alum driveshafts are extremely
noisy and can cause problems especially if things like rocks,etc. get
thrown at it because of the weak alum.

This true?
Ford uses an aluminum driveshaft on their F150's. Other manufacturers also use aluminum. If it were that prone to damage, why would it be on a truck?
SCCAGT is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:56 AM
  #15  
LostBoyz
4th Gear Member
 
LostBoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,292
Default

Originally Posted by SCCAGT
Ford uses an aluminum driveshaft on their F150's. Other manufacturers also use aluminum. If it were that prone to damage, why would it be on a truck?
aluminum is a very tricky metal, depending on how something is made it can have drastically different characteristics. Look at how they bake the all aluminum body on an audi R8, or forged aluminum wheels for high performance cars. So yes a an aluminum driveshaft could be just as strong as steel while being lighter but it depends on how it was made.
LostBoyz is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 10:08 AM
  #16  
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
baddog671's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MD/WV
Posts: 5,736
Default

I have the shaftmaster unit on mine, and like said by another member, it seems to tighten up the feel of the drivetrain. I don't remember if the buttdyno picked up any ponies from it, but at ~20lbs. lighter than stock, you can't go wrong with it. I think a more drastic benefit would be gained from 1-piece forged wheels, but they aren't too cheap...
baddog671 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 10:35 AM
  #17  
K9er
 
K9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: europe
Posts: 25
Default

I've got the Steeda 1pce alu driveshaft, but I've got it together with the SC so I can't tell about faster or not. I was told that if you go FI, it's safer to change the driveshaft to a 1 piece. It will reduce the loss of HP but certainly not 50%
K9er is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 09:32 AM
  #18  
moochman4life
3rd Gear Member
 
moochman4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by VistaBlue
An aluminum driveshaft with a tune, put on at the same time, will literally make you giggle until your face hurts the first time you row through the gears.

The difference in throttle response and revving is drastic.
Question: My car already tuned...then add driveshaft would equate to = roughly the same?

Put my driveshaft on yesterday (no safety loop). Feels much "tighter"...more put together...and no "clunking". Best way I can explain it, currently.

I put my HT10's and HP+'s on yesterday at the same time as the ds, so I didn't play around too much with feeling it out...want to bed my pads first before I start getting on it.
moochman4life is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 12:10 PM
  #19  
ski
4th Gear Member
 
ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,470
Default

Originally Posted by Nuke
Your assumption is based on the DS being the source of the 16% loss. What you've missed is that the 16% loss is accumulated from not just the DS but from other rotational mass including your wheels and tires, plus other "drag" on the engine such as the water pump, alternator, etc.
The power loss in the drivetrain does not include any of the losses from belt driven engine accessories, because the current SAE engine testing standard mandates that all belt driven accessories must be installed and operable for engine dyno tests.
ski is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 12:49 PM
  #20  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

Originally Posted by ski
The power loss in the drivetrain does not include any of the losses from belt driven engine accessories, because the current SAE engine testing standard mandates that all belt driven accessories must be installed and operable for engine dyno tests.
Interesting...

So, if you were to install UDP's and an electric water pump, would those gains be deemed CRANK HP gains since you'd essentially be reducing efficiency losses that ARE considered in CRANK HP values?
Nuke is offline  


Quick Reply: Aluminum Driveshaft making a difference



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.