MustangFirstCar

Did the 3.7 V6 just get compared to a 5.7 hemi V8?

pascal

Those magazines should be made of softer paper so at least, they'd be good at something.

You guys get bent out of shape too easily though...

Art161

I don't see it as Mustang bashing. Somebody made a mistake. Actually, I think you could interpret the author's comments to mean that a car in the Charger's price range that could post better times than the Mustang must be really good. To me, he is using the Mustang as a benchmark to which other cars should aspire. Too bad he got his numbers wrong.

This article aside, I think R&T is not as good as it once was. They eliminated a column some time back that I enjoyed. The Tech Advice column, IMO, sucks quite a bit. About the only thing I find decent is Peter Egan's column.