Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My old man claims this......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2011, 09:17 AM
  #81  
ski
4th Gear Member
 
ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,470
Default

Perceptions of straight line acceleration differences between factory production classic muscle cars and current muscle cars are irrelevant when factual data is considered. And I am talking about comparing test numbers from the late 60's/early 70's and today.
ski is offline  
Old 06-03-2011, 11:08 AM
  #82  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Comparison is what you can do when the numbers are sitting in front of you. It's what you have to do if you weren't there the first time around or didn't pay much attention to cars if you were. My 10-years-younger brother could be the poster child for either . . .

Perception is what makes up memories, and it becomes part of what you have left to go on in the absence of hard numerical data. It's also most all of what OP's Dad has to go on.

Of course there is a difference.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 06-03-2011, 11:15 AM
  #83  
Unleashedbeast
4th Gear Member
 
Unleashedbeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by ski
I wonder how tired those classic muscle car engines were?
They were all restored/refreshed. This isn't even a consideration of the performance variance.
Unleashedbeast is offline  
Old 06-03-2011, 12:47 PM
  #84  
ski
4th Gear Member
 
ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,470
Default

I owned a '68 383 RoadRunner in 1968 when I was 20. It wasn't the factory stock king of the hill, running the 1/4 in the 14's.
But I also drove a few other faster factory stock muscle cars owned by friends(427 Vette, Mopar Hemi & 6-Pack, & 427 Ford Fairlane), and I saw them run the 1/4 anywhere from the high 12's-low 13's at a local drag strip.
So I suppose one can say I have both comparison and perception, which in my case do not differ according to what I've experienced and what I've read.
ski is offline  
Old 06-03-2011, 01:12 PM
  #85  
ski
4th Gear Member
 
ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,470
Default

If those engines were tight, then the drivers apparently had a bad driver mod according to the majority of acceleration tests performed with those cars during that era.

When muscle cars are compared, there's one item that is always top priority => straight line performance.

Last edited by ski; 06-03-2011 at 01:14 PM.
ski is offline  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:25 PM
  #86  
outceltj
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
outceltj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 2,248
Default

I suppose when I get a little older the same comparisons will be made and kids will be talking about there sports cars and comparing them to what I am running now. It will be interesting too see where the sports car era will be in say another 20 to 25 years. Hopefully SEMA can keep the american sports car just that SPORTS CAR.
outceltj is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 08:19 AM
  #87  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

The good thing about the old cars is that with just a bit of tweaking, you could take about all of them in the 12s because of the big cube.
Cams and carburetor mods get you 50hp right of the bat.
For example, the Boss 429 was tested at 14" bone stock but tune that thing properly and you can do some spanking.
My best friend neighbor used to have one of those and he tracked it in the 11s.
The idiot should have never sold that car.
pascal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flash_xx
S197 Handling Section
14
10-16-2015 07:23 AM
Explosive
Street/Strip
17
10-02-2015 07:45 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
7
09-29-2015 09:18 PM
mrappe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-26-2015 10:16 AM
ctgreddy
Street/Strip
11
09-20-2015 08:35 PM



Quick Reply: My old man claims this......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.