Which back end do you like better?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

02-10-2012, 11:30 AM

#41

Rainson

3rd Gear Member

Join Date: May 2007

Location: MHS,MI

Posts: 916

05-09..
the 2010 rear makes the car look heavy to me.. good choice to paint the bottom to match the body..both look good.

02-10-2012, 05:06 PM

#42

mustang0672

4th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2011

Location: Galveston, Texas

Posts: 1,378

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainson

05-09..
the 2010 rear makes the car look heavy to me.. good choice to paint the bottom to match the body..both look good.

Thanks, hopefully my fox body will get a new look sooner or later.

02-10-2012, 05:18 PM

#43

Avery0001

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Jun 2011

Location: NY

Posts: 100

2010-12 But only if it's the Saleen S281

If not then the 05-09 with the california special rear.

02-10-2012, 05:20 PM

#44

JayyVee

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Oct 2011

Location: Woodstock, GA

Posts: 485

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jas5

The 2005-209 is more classic, plain, humble, etc. It also looks more bloated, with a blank stare. And masculine (flat and square)

The 2010+ is much more updated, stylish, hip, euro, etc. It looks like it lost weight, with a smile. And more feminen (curves)

I like the 2010+ look better, but still think the earlier one has its own unique characteristics that look more "classic". Part of it is, i've seen a bajillion 05-09's and a lot less newer ones. Tons of stock v6's (yours is sick though!)

Couldn't have put it better myself. I dig the 05-09's for the full on retro look they brought back. I really dig the 10+ look for a updated, modernized take on the retro look.