Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2014 Mustangs
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

2005 - 2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by Latemodel Restoration


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-31-2012, 04:45 PM   #1
eolson
3rd Gear Member
 
eolson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 874
Default Question about 2002 Mach 1 ??

Hey everyone, I was talking to a guy i met today in a parking lot with a 2002 Mach 1. It was in real nice shape. He mentioned the stock power of that car was released at 315 HP. He also mentioned that the models engine was really a 98'' Cobra design mostly, and that Paul's High Performance in Jackson MI had put very open exhaust on it, did aggressive cam and head work and some other stuff.

I was surprised when he said it was now making 465rwhp N/A. It sounded beefy somewhat, and he said it was his daily driver, and when he drove away it sounded and behaved like a standard street car with headers. Is it really possible to get a 2002 Mach 1 that's still seems like a reasonable daily driver up to 465 rwhp N/A ??

It just seems odd considering that people with a 2005 platform 4.6's complain how hard and expensive it is to get there cars up to 340rwhp up from stock 265rwhp, and that's with pretty rough idle and not so pleasant stop and go dd behavior.

Am I way off on this? A 2002 Mach 1 465rwhp N/A, and still seems like a civil stop and go car?? Just wondering, thanks, Erik
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
06' Mustang GT prem pkg, Saleen SC/10lb kit, Donny Walsh tuned, 454rwhp(17 degrees timing), 442tk (larger Saleen heat exchanger), dual fuel pump. Complete Saleen, Steeda, H&R suspension upgrades, Techco watts link, Borla exhaust, MRT H pipe, JBA shorty headrs, Alum DS & Flywheel, dual clutch, 9,10x18 chrome bullitt wheels, 285/40/18 & 255/45/18 Nitto 555 tires. Stop-tech 14" Big brakes front, Shelby rotors rear, ss lines and pads. New car scent air freshener.

Last edited by eolson; 03-31-2012 at 04:47 PM.
eolson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 05:20 PM   #2
bakerjd
5th Gear Member

 
bakerjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,862
Josh Baker JoshuaDBaker xxPanduh
Default

1. There's no way he was talking in terms of power to the wheels. Flywheel HP was his reference. (stock~267, supposedly modded~395hp)

2. Mach 1 wasn't available until 2003 and only claimed 305hp stock (could be wrong here but I'm pretty certain).

3. I personally think he's full of ****.

4. Yes, the modular engine was based off of earlier SVT cobra engine designs.
__________________


2015 Ford Mustang GT Premium Triple Yellow - Ordered
2006 Ford Mustang GT Premium Screaming Yellow - 1st Car/Soon to be Retired Daily Driver/April '12 ROTM
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 Dark Shadow Gray - Gone
2004 Ford Mustang GT Premium Oxford White - Gone

Last edited by bakerjd; 03-31-2012 at 05:26 PM.
bakerjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 05:36 PM   #3
eolson
3rd Gear Member
 
eolson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 874
Default

Thanks bakerjd, he was definitely saying 465rwhp becacuse he was claiming 505 standard HP. I had to correct him and tell him if your using Ford standard math, that rwhp is about 12-14% on average on drive train loss. I told him 465rwhp would be about 535-540 flywheel HP.

I agree with you from my best recollection, that the Mach 1 was a bit over 300 stock, so I can't see how you could get it much past 325-340rwhp without serious work. Paul's High Performance is a good shop, and he sounded as though he had been there a lot, but I can't see increasing that much power up from a stock release of 305HP go up to anything near 465rwhp N/A.

Even with extreme exhaust, heads, cams, large air intake and what ever else, I can't see going from 270rwhp to more than 340rwhp as I mentioned. Erik
__________________
06' Mustang GT prem pkg, Saleen SC/10lb kit, Donny Walsh tuned, 454rwhp(17 degrees timing), 442tk (larger Saleen heat exchanger), dual fuel pump. Complete Saleen, Steeda, H&R suspension upgrades, Techco watts link, Borla exhaust, MRT H pipe, JBA shorty headrs, Alum DS & Flywheel, dual clutch, 9,10x18 chrome bullitt wheels, 285/40/18 & 255/45/18 Nitto 555 tires. Stop-tech 14" Big brakes front, Shelby rotors rear, ss lines and pads. New car scent air freshener.
eolson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 07:24 PM   #4
Entaille
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Vehicle: 2012 Mustang GT
Location: WA
Posts: 1,514
Default

I would have to imagine a car of that age would have some miles on it too - engines get tired and they lose power over the miles. typically not a whole lot of power loss, just another factor to consider
Entaille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 07:24 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
2004, daily, diablosport, driver, fly, forum, high, hp, idle, mach, mach1, pauls, performance, rough, wheel

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup