Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

only getting 187 miles to empty at full tank.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2013, 11:02 PM
  #1  
BlackShelbyGt500
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BlackShelbyGt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: california
Posts: 377
Default only getting 187 miles to empty at full tank.

hey guys i used to be able to tap off on my gas at 217 mile before empty but lately when i put gas on the car if would tap off and it would only say 187 to E. any idea on why this is happening?
BlackShelbyGt500 is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 11:20 PM
  #2  
THS_Steed06
2nd Gear Member
 
THS_Steed06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: IL
Posts: 200
Default

What year is your Shelby? I've heard of some problems with the fuel tank float sensors getting sticky in winter. If its not rising all the way up it could be telling the ecu it has less gas than it does?

Try seeing if when you get down to 5 or 10 miles left to E how many gallons you are putting in. If its less that 14.7 or 14.8 it may be a good test of the fuel level in the tank.

Just a thought.

Tom
THS_Steed06 is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 11:36 PM
  #3  
sbradle4
2nd Gear Member
 
sbradle4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 481
Default

Also could just be the winter fuel blend. With all the extra additives, it's less efficient. This the first time you have noticed the drop in projected miles to E though, I assume.
sbradle4 is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 11:45 PM
  #4  
BlackShelbyGt500
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BlackShelbyGt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: california
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by THS_Steed06
What year is your Shelby? I've heard of some problems with the fuel tank float sensors getting sticky in winter. If its not rising all the way up it could be telling the ecu it has less gas than it does?

Try seeing if when you get down to 5 or 10 miles left to E how many gallons you are putting in. If its less that 14.7 or 14.8 it may be a good test of the fuel level in the tank.

Just a thought.

Tom
i actually had it down to 1 mile to E but i never really pay attention on how many gallon i put on it. its 2008. IS IT A 16gallon tank you think?
BlackShelbyGt500 is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 11:46 PM
  #5  
BlackShelbyGt500
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BlackShelbyGt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: california
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by sbradle4
Also could just be the winter fuel blend. With all the extra additives, it's less efficient. This the first time you have noticed the drop in projected miles to E though, I assume.
i think the last time i actually had it to 200+ miles was a few months ago.
BlackShelbyGt500 is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 11:51 PM
  #6  
sbradle4
2nd Gear Member
 
sbradle4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by BlackShelbyGt500
i think the last time i actually had it to 200+ miles was a few months ago.
My 2010 GT gets 1-1.5 mpg less in the winter. So almost 20 miles less at 13 gallons (typically how much I fill up)
sbradle4 is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 06:21 AM
  #7  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

Using the "Miles to empty" method of determining your fuel mileage (and any related issues) is a very inaccurate way to do business.

Are you doing any hand calculating from fillup to fillup? That would be your most accurate method. If not, then you need to reset your onboard at each fillup.

Driving style, where you drive, ethanol content, ambient conditions, vehicle condition.... these all have a major impact on fuel mileage. I often see as much as a 10 MPG difference between my city driving and long distance cruise mileage on my GT. Also, how accurate is your speedometer? Have you compared it to a GPS? People will often change gears or tire size and don't correct the PCM for these changes which throw off the on-board.
Nuke is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 11:57 AM
  #8  
07BLACKGT
5th Gear Member
 
07BLACKGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,935
Default

I thought the miles-to-empty fluctuated with the average MPG, so when your MPG figure goes down, you will have less "miles to empty." I could be totally wrong here.
07BLACKGT is offline  
Old 02-02-2013, 03:15 PM
  #9  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

Originally Posted by 07BLACKGT
I thought the miles-to-empty fluctuated with the average MPG,...
I believe you're correct. But my personal issue with even paying attention to "Miles to Empty" is that it can read "0" and you still have an unknown amount of fuel in the tank in most cases so it's use as a comparison from one tank to the next is pointless, unless you're tracking the exact # of miles you drive until you literally run out of fuel (and who's stupid enough to do that?).
Nuke is offline  
Old 02-04-2013, 11:04 AM
  #10  
chub46
2nd Gear Member
 
chub46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 232
Default

If you are topping off when you fill up with gas I recommend not doing that. When the gas pump stops remove the nozzle. Topping off could mess up your fuel sensing system.
chub46 is offline  


Quick Reply: only getting 187 miles to empty at full tank.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.