howarmat

I would only trust Torque for use on the PIDs. that actually goes for most all applications like that. Hell my Aeroforce guage never gave me a good HP number either

BairdGT

yea, I figured what the hell like $20 for the ELM327 and then like $5 for the app so like $25 figured why the hell not, just figured with all the "reviews" and "comments" oh people using the ELM327 being so accurate why not give it a go but I just found it only useful for the PIDs.

I've come to basically figure out the TrackApps differential between it and what I am actually pulling just figured I would give the adapter/app a shot to see how it compared to what TrackApps feeds me

moosestang

your track app thingy isn't going to be accurate if the tires spin and even then it's questionable for 0-60.

I've tried the dynolicious app on an ipod touch. the largest hp I've gotten is 388, but I've never done a full 1/4 mile run with it. Best 0-60 I could get was 4.7, but I wasn't hitting 60 in 2nd gear. I could hit 0-50 in 3.7 seconds. This is all with drag radials. If you think you are running 0-60 in 4.4 second with street tires, well, you probably aren't.

I also tried the ipod/dynolicious on my motorcycle with a secure mount and got 0-60 in 3.28, 1/4 mile 10.73@130 with a pathetic 2.35 60 foot time, but it showed my hp as 192. the bike dyno'd 130hp.

Andy13186

what were your 60 foot times with the drag radials on the mustang according to dynolicious?

According to dynolivious ive ran a few sub 4.5 sec 0-60s with street tires on a good street, and yes hitting over 60 mph in 2nd gear, never have got below like 2.2-2.4 60 foot time though according to the app. It is the street though, cant expect too much i suppose.

For the bike, you have to enter a good correct weight of the bike + gas, rider and gear combo. The time and trap sounds pretty good there.

BairdGT

For the most part I have found TrackApps to be fairly accurate obviously not DEAD ON accurate but fairly close in some of its times but have found a few glitches with it but majority of the time TrackApps tells me I am running 13.0@112 which I have compared to Timeslips and it told me 13.0 on a 12.733@112 run and 12.86@112 run so it's approx. 0.2-0.3 off on the 1/4 mile depending how it rounds as it only figures to 1 decimal place. Granted on your typical average day the DA correction equates to 3200-3400ft above sea level and all runs have been on the stock Pirelli A/S.

As for the 0-60 with TrackApps it tells me 4.4-4.6 probably about 90% of the time the other 10% is me failing miserably on my launch then I crack into the 5s.

A guy on the Corvette forums has used created a spreadsheet you input your timeslip information and it calculates your 0-60 based on that information and has been tested with direct instrumentation on the vehicle and it accurate to 1-2 hundreths of a second gotta love engineers who are car guys and get bored lol

Based on his calculations my all-time best 0-60 on my 12.733 run was 4.43 and on my 12.86 run was a 4.46

Link to spreadsheet
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...alculator.html

now the funny part about TrackApps is if you reset your stats.. ONLY run 1/4mile runs then view your all-time bests it has claimed that my 0-30 is 2.3s but at the same time I have pulled a 0-60 of 2.3s LOL yet if you actually select 0-60 run I have never cracked anything better then a 4.4

When I do my 0-60 with my 245/45/19 and 93 Bama Tune the only way I reach 60mph in 2nd is if I WOT right to redline and just before hitting the limiter let off the throttle and coast otherwise I peg off the limiter or have to go into 3rd

moosestang

I haven't gotten better than 2.3 60 foot with the car.