The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 2010-2011 Mustang Technical Discussions
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


View Poll Results: Can the 2010 Mustang compete with the 2010 Camaro and Challenger?
Yes, the price makes up for the power difference. 52 30.59%
No. Its still going to be slower, model for model 97 57.06%
I dont care, its still better than no increase in power, and I want the 2010 Mustang. 21 12.35%
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2008, 12:51 PM   #1
Demon 340
Administrator
 
Demon 340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Vehicle: 1972 Dodge Demon 340
Location: yep
Posts: 15,372
Send a message via AIM to Demon 340
Default Dollar for Dollar, Can the 2010 Mustang compete?

Based on the main page article information (click here to read it), can the 2010 Mustang compete with the camaro and challenger, dollar for dollar?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Demon 340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 01:01 PM   #2
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,091
Default

Before anyone goes off half cocked about dealer markup. You can get Challengers for MSRP now.
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 01:16 PM   #3
meechuacon
3rd Gear Member
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 541
Unhappy Weak 2010 mustang

C'mon Ford, you should have made the 5.4L 4V aluminum with high compression the standard in the new GT to keep up with the new Camaro. And then made them the same price as the new Camaro, that way it's an even race, maybe not with the weight advantage of the mustang, but either way, the mustang is going to ride better and look better so................ But now the Chevy people are going to be bragging about that new camaro
__________________
03 Mach 1
SCT X3
MGW SS
JLT RAI
FRPP Alum. Driveshaft
MM Lower control arms
Poly spring iso's
FRPP girdle
Mac O/R Prochamber
Bassani Cat-back

I have a Diablosport for sale, PM me!!
meechuacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 01:41 PM   #4
Joolander
100% Kosher Ninja
2007 Ford Mustang
 
Joolander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 2007 Mustang GT/CS
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,134
Default

you should probably include the torque ratings in the article, it seems to level th playing field a bit

camaro LS and LT (v6 models) has 273 ft-lbs
the SS will do 408 and 395, (with LS3 and L99 respectively)

mustang v6 has 240 ft-lbs (dont call them a torque monster for nothing)
mustang gt has 325 ft-lbs (with the 2010 tune)
shelby GT500 has 480 ft-lbs

Chally SE (v6) will have somewhere around 232 ft-lbs (if they use the 3.5L)
chally RT has 404 ft-lbs
chally srt8 has 425 ft-lbs


all of those are at the flywheel, of course
keep in mind the weights of these cars, and the mustang still competes at the right scale price wise (and challenger is kind of drowning)
__________________


Last edited by Joolander; 11-21-2008 at 01:48 PM.
Joolander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:00 PM   #5
Derf00
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 6,836
Default

o Fuggin a people...two things are significant enough to be considered when trying to compare apples to apples, one is the weight which that article addressed, the other is TQ.
A 300hp car is not the same as a 300Hp car that has 325 tq vs only say 280tq. All things equal (including weight) and the car with the higher TQ will accelerate faster. Period, Physics trumps all. When are people going to understand that? So long as half assed articles and posting about HP alone perpatuate the myths, the average person will continue to think that a 300hp camaro is as fast as a 300 or 315 hp Mustang.
>:I I'm going to laugh my arse off when I have a V6 pull up next to me and start talkin shizz and I leave them eating asphalt on green when I pull several car lenths on them.
Derf00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:00 PM   #6
mynameismike65
4th Gear Member
 
mynameismike65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,090
Default

Yeah Ford dropped the ball on the new GTs powerplant. 15 hp increase!?!? come on I could go out and get a JLT with a Brenspeed tune and get that....and more! Im more then dissapointed. I knew they wouldnt put the 5.0 in the GTs, but they should have done something.......I was hoping to see around 400 N/A
__________________
06 GT
Black/Black
5 spd
JLT Intake + Brenspeed Tune
Mac a/b
Mac o/r Prochamber
Hurst Shifter
Tint
__________________
|.....Overnight.....................| ||
|........Japan Parts................||'|";,___. <~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \_ OH NO'S! It's Toretto!
|_..._...____________======||_|_|...,]------------------__/----\___
"(@)'(@)""'''''''''''''"'''"**|(@)(@)*****"(@)--------------~['(@)***(@)_'\
mynameismike65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:04 PM   #7
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,091
Default

400hp was seriously wishful thinking. 335-350 was more "reasonable".

Is this the lowest gain in hp for the mustang ever from one body style or refresh to the next?
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:07 PM   #8
GT2ENVY
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 101
Default

This is very disappointing. I understand that Ford will sell more mustangs (especially the v6) and they do not worry too much about hp and performance, but we do. I understand your statement Derf about a v6 pulling and thinking he can beat you, but thats embarrassing considering that a v6 is only a few modifications of being just as fast if not faster. The v6 is not even in the ame class as the GT, but its only a few ponies away. If the camaro ss is only 3k more than the GT, then that is a deal to me. Putting 3k in a gt will not give you the 423hp that the camaro has. Overall, chevy owners are going to brag and they have all the reason to do so. Its just frustrating.
__________________
fully built motor, 3.73s, bbk shorty, x-pipe, mac catback, shift kit, cnl plenum + inlet + 80mm maf, 75mm throttle, pi heads, pi manifold, comp cams xe262ah, steeda timing adjuster set at 16 degrees
GT2ENVY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:07 PM   #9
Vapour Trails
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 477
Default

I'd rather have the lighter car, period. Weight is the enemy of performance - whether it be acceleration, braking or handling. The current size and mass of my S197 is the most I would ever accept.

The mustang will still crush the competition in sales, just like always. I guanrantee the challenger won't be made 3 years down the road. Quote me on this.
__________________

Whipple @ 9 psi - 445rwhp/400rwtq - 12.07 @ 118.7 mph
Steeda sport springs - Steeda strut mounts - Steeda TriAx- Steeda Adjustable Panhard Bar - Steeda Axleback - D-Spec shocks - J&M LCAs - FRPP 4.10s - GT500 spoiler -
And probably more I can't remember
All work done by owner
Vapour Trails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 02:11 PM   #10
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GT2ENVY View Post
Overall, chevy owners are going to brag and they have all the reason to do so. Its just frustrating.
AGAIN. We had to hear it for years about "10 year old LS1 cars pwning new GTs" and it looks like Ford has set us up for a repeat of history.

Wunderbar!
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2005, 2010, build, compete, complaint, dollar, driveline, mossmustang, mustang, s197, strap, torque, underpowered, v6, weak, youtube

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company