The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 2010-2011 Mustang Technical Discussions
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2009, 06:58 PM   #161
wilkinda
2010 Section Moderator
 
wilkinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 2010, Ford Mustang GT Premium
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 1,733
Send a message via AIM to wilkinda
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mygt500 View Post
I think the car has grown on me tremendously and I feel it is a great car. Ford made a mistake by not painting everything once again in body color but that is an easy fix and I would love the new GT500 and would buy one in a sec if I had the cash!....carry on
Sir, carrying on SIR!!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
USAF (Retired) / Gas Turbine Controls Systems Engineer (Current)
Current: 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium, Grabber Blue, (401A) Premier Interior Char /w Grabber Blue Stripe, 5-Speed, 3.73 rear, Electronic Pkg (Nav), 19" Painted Nickel Luster Wheels, Comfort Pkg, Security Pkg...

Current Mods: FRPP lowering springs, Roush O/R Exhaust, tinted windows, 3M Clear Bra, Headlight / Fog Tint


Delivered: July 27th, 2009

MyCarDomain Page
wilkinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:10 PM   #162
mygt500
Multi-Tasking Moderator!
 
mygt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Detroit Rock City!
Posts: 14,014
Default

Figured since its the 4th and I do have e-rank on the forum I would respond the way I did.....LOL
__________________

2006 Mustang GT with Cervinis Kit
Whipple Crew member
H.O. S/C 465 RWHP and 440RWTQ

First online article about my car! check it out!
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8811-Detroit-Sports-Car-Examiner~y2009m5d30-Jason-McGuires-2006-Mustang-GT

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3342086

www.mocsem.com
mygt500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:36 PM   #163
Cardm31
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Vehicle: 1982 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Utah
Posts: 15
Default Clueless?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pascal View Post
So, we're trashing the 010 because lots of us don't like the new look?!?!
What was your first clue?
I don't think I'm as clueless as you think. I'm just wondering what those of you that don't like the new look were expecting? I read a lot of complaints about the rear end but, I don't think it looks bad. I agree that certain parts of the car should have been painted body color but, since Ford did the rocker panels in black to give the car a lowered look (according to various car mags), not doing the rear valance in black would have given it a weird look.
I've read a lot of criticism about the 2010 design but, what would those of you that don't like it at all have done for 2010? Ford couldn't have gotten too wild as I've read that there's suppose to be an all new Mustang in 2012 (possibly as a 2013?).
Cardm31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:45 PM   #164
Norm Peterson
5th Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2008 GT Premium
Location: Delaware Twp, NJ
Posts: 3,372
Default

I think that the usual reasons for cladding along the bottom of the body is done to reduce the visual image of height or hide mechanical underbody bits rather than create an appearance of being lowered. It's hard to make a car look like it's been lowered when there's still a substantial gap above the wheels (no matter what else you do).


Norm
__________________
08 GT Premium Black/Light Graphite, stick, un-FStock
weenie-EP 626/V6/stick, Prepared just enough, sometimes
Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:55 PM   #165
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,648
Default

Well, the 010 has the legendary raised body line from the end of the door and I like that the best on the new style (retro curves).

As far as what I've would have done on the 010...I'd kept the round headlight up front and make the front end pointier like the 69/70 cars.
At the back, I'd used the look of the 05 Concept car, with tail lights going across the rear.

That alone, would have score points with a broader crowd.
__________________
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 11:28 PM   #166
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,067
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default

Agreed. The new rear has been growing on me, and I know with some minor cosmetic touches it'll look fine........but some long lamp styled tail lights like those on the 04 GTR Mustang would have been absolute killer.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 11:47 PM   #167
Gene K
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 1,583
Default

Guys its al ways this way...

The Fox Body guys didnt like the 1987 freshening... the SN95 guys didnt like the 1999 freshening and the S197 guys are having issues with the 2010... so whats new.

For the record the 2010 Steeda Sport looks really good, the Roush 427R looks pretty good and the GT500 looks killer. The only thing that looks a little blah is the standard Ford produced Mustang GT but we all know thats just the raw material not the finished product.

So the question is.... 2009 GT500 for $4000 Off MSRP or wait for the 5.0 Coyote.... Hmmmm......
__________________
Gene
2007 GT-D M5 3.55 3700 lb (280 lb Driver)
CAI/Tune and Stock Pirellis
1.909 8.345@84.83 12.957@106.62
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/h...nePirellis.jpg
Gene K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 02:38 PM   #168
8178A
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 626
Default

It is very hard for anyone to take an extraordinary perfect design like the 2005 through 2009 Mustang GT and change it so it looks better without messing up some part of it. BMW had the same problem with the 2002 Seven Series.
__________________
This is my 2009 Mustang GT Premium, there are many like it, but this one is mine!

Brilliant Silver/Black, 5 speed manual, 3:55 gears, 18" wheels, Microsoft Sync and 93 octane tune configuration from Brenspeed. All original chalk car. Past Mustang owned, Black 07 GT Premiun, 5 speed manual.

Patiently waiting for Ford to design my next Mustang! Let’s get with it Ford!


8178A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 06:44 PM   #169
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8178A View Post
It is very hard for anyone to take an extraordinary perfect design like the 2005 through 2009 Mustang GT and change it so it looks better without messing up some part of it. BMW had the same problem with the 2002 Seven Series.
The 05/09 have an extraordinary perfect design?!?!
It belongs in an issue of the playboy centerfold then.
Fap at will boys...
__________________
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 06:49 PM   #170
wilkinda
2010 Section Moderator
 
wilkinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 2010, Ford Mustang GT Premium
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 1,733
Send a message via AIM to wilkinda
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8178A View Post
It is very hard for anyone to take an extraordinary perfect design like the 2005 through 2009 Mustang GT and change it so it looks better without messing up some part of it. BMW had the same problem with the 2002 Seven Series.
As an '05 GT premium owner I found that when you make statements such as the one you made above it is best to start with "In my opinion" because not everyone..myself included feels the 2005 thru 2009 was an extraodinary perfect design. By just making your blanket statement somone one will..in a negative way..try to defend the 2010 design from the comment. In fact...on the '05 - '09 I thought the rear was the bland part of the whole car. I love the new design and I am in fact awaiting my order... IN MY OPINION the new body has more character....

There are things I like and dislike about both designs.... but I like more about the 2010 style personally that was the motivater for me to buy a new one.
__________________
USAF (Retired) / Gas Turbine Controls Systems Engineer (Current)
Current: 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium, Grabber Blue, (401A) Premier Interior Char /w Grabber Blue Stripe, 5-Speed, 3.73 rear, Electronic Pkg (Nav), 19" Painted Nickel Luster Wheels, Comfort Pkg, Security Pkg...

Current Mods: FRPP lowering springs, Roush O/R Exhaust, tinted windows, 3M Clear Bra, Headlight / Fog Tint


Delivered: July 27th, 2009

MyCarDomain Page

Last edited by wilkinda; 07-06-2009 at 10:49 AM.
wilkinda is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2010, 427r, challenger, design, disappointed, evolution, figures, graphite, mustang, mustangs, orders, roush, sales, takeoff, tiers, wheels

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company