The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 2010-2011 Mustang Technical Discussions
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2009, 08:36 PM   #1
Bmr4life
4th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 2005, Ford, Mustang
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,770
Default Well Well Well. Mustang beats Camaro and Challanger on C&D.

Just finished reading the article.

---------------0-60 1/4 mph
----Camaro SS 4.8 13.0 111
-Challenger RT 5.1 13.6 106
--Mustang GT 4.9 13.6 105

Camaro has 426hp/420tq, Challenger 376hp/410tq, Mustang 315hp/325tq

Scary part though, those cars OWN on the top end.

---------------0-60 0-100 0-140mph
----Camaro SS 4.8 10.7 22.3
-Challenger RT 5.1 12.2 27.7
-Mustang GT 4.9 12.3 34.2


Mustang had trackpack with 3.73 rear end.

Mustang won the top vote overall. Handling best by a long shot.

I'm impressed.

link to C&D online
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

SLP Crew Member
JCT II CAI & Xcal 2 from Brenspeed
Black Razors 20x9 Nitto NT555's 265/35R20
Bmr4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 03:47 AM   #2
Orion_240
6th Gear Member
 
Orion_240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle: 2008 Shelby GT Convertible
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 5,043
Default

that's proof that engines alone do not make a car great!

That's why all this talk about the new 5.0 engine in the Mustang needs to be curtailed or restrained!
Getting all excited about horsepower could leave you frustrated with your uncomfortable car. Like some Camaro owners are!

Concentrate on the more important things, like fit and finish, handling, safety and mpg. Those real world issues aren't as sexy as fast 1/4 mile times, but if all you want is a 12 second drag race, buy a used Mustang for $7,000 and build it up, saving you about $25,000!
Orion_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 04:40 AM   #3
Baddog
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion_240 View Post
that's proof that engines alone do not make a car great!

That's why all this talk about the new 5.0 engine in the Mustang needs to be curtailed or restrained!
Getting all excited about horsepower could leave you frustrated with your uncomfortable car. Like some Camaro owners are!

Concentrate on the more important things, like fit and finish, handling, safety and mpg. Those real world issues aren't as sexy as fast 1/4 mile times, but if all you want is a 12 second drag race, buy a used Mustang for $7,000 and build it up, saving you about $25,000!
That's exactly what I'm doing. I don't want a luxuriously soft heavy street car. I'll DD a mut and weekend a taut light monster devoid of creature comforts. Long live the 'notchback...
Baddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 05:54 AM   #4
boomee
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 04subaru forester turbo
Location: northern virginia
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion_240 View Post
that's proof that engines alone do not make a car great!

That's why all this talk about the new 5.0 engine in the Mustang needs to be curtailed or restrained!
Getting all excited about horsepower could leave you frustrated with your uncomfortable car. Like some Camaro owners are!

Concentrate on the more important things, like fit and finish, handling, safety and mpg. Those real world issues aren't as sexy as fast 1/4 mile times, but if all you want is a 12 second drag race, buy a used Mustang for $7,000 and build it up, saving you about $25,000!
i couldnt have said it myself if i had a dollor for everytime people thought they would beat me in a race cause they had the most hp id be a rich man in my opinion handling is king anyways 2010 mustang im coming !!!!!!!
boomee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 06:39 AM   #5
Baddog
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomee View Post
i couldnt have said it myself if i had a dollor for everytime people thought they would beat me in a race cause they had the most hp id be a rich man in my opinion handling is king anyways 2010 mustang im coming !!!!!!!
Rental fleets already have auto-vert GT's here at the airport in Vancouver in Grabber blue. I'm gonna pay the $89.95 and pound the **** out of it up to Whistler the same way I did the '05. I have to say, the slantnosed ass end is growing on me a little bit...
Baddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 08:26 AM   #6
ztalon
2nd Gear Member
 
ztalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 258
Default

I've been keeping an eye on the new Camaro and Mustang and I have to admit that the Mustang would get the nod for me over the Camaro right now. The most disturbing thing to me about the Camaro is the poor visability out of the car (particularly the C - Pillars). I had a 73 Mach 1 and that car had absolutely terrible blind spots. I have no desire to drive a car that I can't be comfortable about seeing out of.

Right from the start, I lost interest in the Challenger, when I saw how big it was. Not that the Mustang is small, but it is definitely smaller than the Challenger and a bit smaller than the Camaro.

Then again, price could have an effect on all of this. Even if the Mustang wins a few competitions with its rivals (and it hasn't won all of them), price and availability will ultimately have a big effect on this war.
__________________
2003 Zinc Yellow Mach 1 5M
Bought used (6/09) just over 8,000 miles.
Winter car: 2002 Eclipse GT, 5M
ztalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 12:56 PM   #7
East87
4th Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
East87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,086
Send a message via AIM to East87
Default

When you're comparing the base prices (and then the dealer markups) for the GT versus the SS, the closeness of these results is pretty sad...
__________________
-Andrew



C&L Racer/Brenspeed 93 tune, FRPP 4.10's, Pypes o/r H, Magnaflows, MGW Shifter, BMR LCA's, Roush Rear Springs, CHE K-member brace w/torque limiters


13.37_107.04
East87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 01:05 PM   #8
cad316
1st Gear Member
 
cad316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 05 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ztalon View Post
I've been keeping an eye on the new Camaro and Mustang and I have to admit that the Mustang would get the nod for me over the Camaro right now. The most disturbing thing to me about the Camaro is the poor visability out of the car (particularly the C - Pillars). I had a 73 Mach 1 and that car had absolutely terrible blind spots. I have no desire to drive a car that I can't be comfortable about seeing out of.

Right from the start, I lost interest in the Challenger, when I saw how big it was. Not that the Mustang is small, but it is definitely smaller than the Challenger and a bit smaller than the Camaro.

Then again, price could have an effect on all of this. Even if the Mustang wins a few competitions with its rivals (and it hasn't won all of them), price and availability will ultimately have a big effect on this war.
That is true about the blindspots on the Camaro. My wife wants to get one and Im trying to steer her towards a Mustang. The fact that she's short will play a big role if she would be comfortable driving a Camaro. She t-boned some lady bout a year ago, so she's very timid when driving.
__________________
BBK Intake
SCT Tuner
BBK, Shorties
Pypes X-Pipe
SLP Loudmouths
4.10 Gears
Billet Grille
Seqeuntial Taillights
Rear Blackout
LED Third Brake Light
MGW Short Throw Shifter
Eibach Lowering Springs
cad316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 01:22 PM   #9
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,087
Default

I don't understand why anyone would expect the challenger to be a small car. The original cars were big. So are the new ones. Shouldn't be any surprise.
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 02:04 PM   #10
teksp0rt
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 766
Default

Long live the 'notchback... +1!

... bad comparison with the Challenger R/T. They should have used the Challenger STR8. Either way, put a few more ponies in the Mustang (ahem, perhaps that 5.0 engine Ford) and we will have a MONSTER! We all know it is a better car, which is why we are on this forum.
__________________
Looking to be one of the first when the 2010 is released!

2006 BMW 530i - Current Ride
2006 Mustang GT Premium - Sold
2000 Toyota Celica GTS - Sold
1999 Honda Prelude - Sold

Last edited by teksp0rt; 06-02-2009 at 02:10 PM.
teksp0rt is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
01000, 0140, 2008, 2010, beats, camaro, challanger, challenger, charger, gt, horsepower, mustang, provofam, srt8, str8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company