BlackBetty93GT

hey

does anyone know what the stock hp and tq is on a 94 gt

my dad just got one and its a 5 speed....my 93 is and aod
he would rather drive an automatic everday than a 5 speed, so he asked me if i want to trade so im tryin to decide...its hard!!

ih8chevy

the 94 gt is rated at 215 and i think 275 or 285 torque at the fly. they are great lookin cars, and if i were u i would probably trade him for it. jmo

BlackBetty93GT

yeah but i think i like my black fox body better

i dont know what to do

ih8chevy

the fox is a better platfrom for racing and the sn is a better platform for driving in general. this was quite an argument a while ago.

samseed101

Even though they have different HP and TQ ratings, I think it's BS. IMO they are both the same or close enough.

The SN95 does have some nice advantages... 130 amp alternator, electric fan, and some other minor lttle perks. The downside... they can be a little more expensive to mod (but not too much more) and the engine bay is really cramped. They're a bit heavier too but not by too much.

BlackBetty93GT

the thing i like about it though is its a 5 speed....so i wont have to spend the extra money on a valve body and stuff like that

AdderMk2

just ask him if you can drive it around for a week to decide.... youll fall in love with the SN-95

BlackBetty93GT

yeah thats a good idea adder

Stanger89

My buddy has a 94 or 95 and when I ride in that car I am reminded how much nicer his ride is thanmine. Of course my fox is lowered, but his car feels so much more solid, and has no rattles. Takes bumps much better, interior is way nicer. Ill tell you what, I do love the look of the fox, but I would rather have the overall nicer car. To me, it seems much more refined.

ttocs

my 94 is completely stock(for now)and I put it on the dyno this weekend for 190 rwhp and 260 tq

I love the fox body with out any doubt but the curves of the sn95 is just too sexy for me..........