The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang > 351 Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2007, 11:45 AM   #1
03Maverik
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2004 Mach 1
Location: NC
Posts: 221
Default Supercharged or not?

Goal - In the 400's rwhp

I have a 1984 351W shortblock for my 66 that was rebuilt stock just before I bought it. I plan on putting an appropriate sized AFR heads on with fuel injection. What would be the best way to obtain this goal? Rebuilding the bottom end, throwing a supercharger on the stock block, or both.

If bolting on a supercharger will work then thatwould benice. I love the sound. However, I am open to pretty much any option.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
04 Mach1 Azure Blue (K&N Filter, Flow Master weld-ins, subframe connectors)
66 Coupe (Torn apart)
03Maverik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 12:17 PM   #2
WhiteWindsor
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Warner Robins,GA
Posts: 2,873
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

That goal can be reached easily n/a or forced induction, it just depends on what you prefer. I havnt had mine dynoed yet but i am confident i have at least 400 rwhp. I have ported heads, big cam, DRP pistons, forged i-beam rods with a little over 11:1 compression. If you decided to go forced induction you should keep your compression around 9:1 give or take a half point.
__________________


Formerly known as FASTBLACK
WhiteWindsor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:47 PM   #3
MadMan@TheWheel
4th Gear Member
 
MadMan@TheWheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Great State Of Texas
Posts: 1,057
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Personally for something easier on the pocketbook, forged stroker assembly, and good heads, cam and intake. Fuel injection or carb is strictly a matter of how street friendly you want it. Opinions vary about streetablity with carbs compared to fuel injection, but it usually comes down to personal preference. If your goal is 400, then stroker on a forged rotating assembly and leave the option open for spray. If bigger numbers are your goal then you might want to look into forced induction of some kind.....Or more spray
__________________
"All our science, measured against reality, is primitve and childlike-and yet it is the most precious thing we have."

Albert Einstein


Be On The Lookout For Avatar Theft
MadMan@TheWheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:01 PM   #4
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Stroker, but I wouldn't spend the extra money for a forged crank.
FullAuto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:12 PM   #5
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 03 Mach 1
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6,636
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

why not spend the extra $$$$ on the crank?, that seems to be a very vital part
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:14 PM   #6
03Maverik
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2004 Mach 1
Location: NC
Posts: 221
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

I need to ask the guy I got it from, but what is the compression on the stock motor? Could I just throw some nice heads on there and bolt up a supercharger at 6-8 psi and be satisfied (with the right gearing of course)? This car will be streetable. If anything, some weekend races, but mostly it will be to look good. If i dont have to tear into the bottom end, that would be awesome. Less money and work.
__________________
04 Mach1 Azure Blue (K&N Filter, Flow Master weld-ins, subframe connectors)
66 Coupe (Torn apart)
03Maverik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:44 PM   #7
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: USMCrebel

why not spend the extra $$$$ on the crank?, that seems to be a very vital part
Well then why not get a $2500 billet?
FullAuto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 12:34 AM   #8
03Maverik
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2004 Mach 1
Location: NC
Posts: 221
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Im not gonna throw insane amounts of money for looks. The power is just to have it, and use it every once in a while. Just something to flex with. The rest of the car will look amazing, I just want a motor to compliment the rest. I will tear into the bottom end if it is necessary, but if its not, then ill just bolt on what I need to.

Thanks for you help guys.
__________________
04 Mach1 Azure Blue (K&N Filter, Flow Master weld-ins, subframe connectors)
66 Coupe (Torn apart)
03Maverik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 07:35 AM   #9
1Sw33t90GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 49
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Ifyou go Supercharged and you don't have the right compression ratio, you will be blowing head gaskets all the time. I speak from experience in this matter. I bought my little gem with a Kenne Bell 2.2 for $5k with blown head gaskets. Replaced the gaskets like 4 times in 6 months. Kinda gets expenssive, especially when you start buying the expensive ones and they still blow. Come to find out, the bottom end was all stock so the compression ratio was way too high. If you're gonna go with the blower, spend the money to reinforce the bottom end. (Me personally, I like the go factor. Sold the parts off my 302 to pay for the 351W and the right pistons & rods.)

Kristi
__________________
http://s233.photobucket.com/albums/ee254/1Sw33t90GT/
1Sw33t90GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 10:34 AM   #10
03Maverik
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2004 Mach 1
Location: NC
Posts: 221
Default RE: Supercharged or not?

Does anyone know what a stock 84 351W compression ratio is? I would really like to know. Its important in the fact that if the ratio is going to be high then I have to rebuild the newly rebuilt block. But if its good, then I am gonna throw a custom ground cam with AFR heads, intake to match, fuel injection and 6-8 psi of blown fun. Should make for a fun ride.
__________________
04 Mach1 Azure Blue (K&N Filter, Flow Master weld-ins, subframe connectors)
66 Coupe (Torn apart)
03Maverik is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2003, 302, 351w, al, charged, comp, e4ae6015fa, engine, lowerig, mach1, mustang, number, ratio, reinforce, super, supercharger, vin

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company