351 Mustang

351W and AFR 185 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2008, 04:59 PM
  #11  
jtmustang
5th Gear Member
 
jtmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: arlington,WA
Posts: 3,743
Default

the collector on the headers should not drag unless you are lowered a ridicuolous amount.

and i am in the same boat as you as i have a 69' block and converting to a hydraulic roller with link bar lifters would be the way as then u will have a lot bigger cam choice to pick from , also they are a better,faster revving setup when setup right in the valve train.

i guess what do u want the car to do? also if u are already dumping afr 185's on it i would look around for a good used set of link bar lifters and do it that way, as i am on the hunt for a set right now myself.
jtmustang is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 09:31 PM
  #12  
TremmRG1
Thread Starter
 
TremmRG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5
Default

I just want a solid, streetable and reasonably or unreasonalby fast car. I had all the parts to build a 302 and had a block all ready to go, but my buddy needed it, so I sold it to him. Came across this 351 and couldn't pass it up....so here I am, learning how to make this work.

Guess I need to make up my mind as far as making it a roller motor.

So...here is my next question. I have long tube headers from my 302 build. I have installed a QA1 K-member. I heard once that if you use convertible motor mounts, that it will make the motor sit lower, any truth to this that you know of? And if so, do you think its enough to use the 302 long tubes?
TremmRG1 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:33 AM
  #13  
jtmustang
5th Gear Member
 
jtmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: arlington,WA
Posts: 3,743
Default

im not sure on the 302 to 351 longtubes..
jtmustang is offline  
Old 12-26-2008, 11:47 PM
  #14  
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
mrbigshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 845
Default

1995 blocks are roller capable out of the box. they still use flat tappit's however. you can use your 302 roller parts for the conversion (lifters, dogbones, retainers). look for a f4te casting number. 1996 and newer 351w used the same block but came from the factory with roller cams.


the issue i see is the large valves on the afr 185 heads being an issue with stick pistons. check to see if there is sufficent valve clearence on the motor. this is where the 165's are used (same flow but they used smaller valves)
mrbigshot is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 02:22 PM
  #15  
mmm rice
1st Gear Member
 
mmm rice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 146
Default

Use bbk long tubes. My dad has them on his car, i love them. If it is going to cost you too must money to convert to roller, dont do it. You will still make over 350whp regardless with your setup, more depending on cam selection.
mmm rice is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 08:31 AM
  #16  
wildcobrar
3rd Gear Member
 
wildcobrar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 577
Default

There are better heads out there for about the same ammount of money. I would do some research.

Joe
wildcobrar is offline  
Old 01-17-2009, 09:51 AM
  #17  
vanilliagorillia79
 
vanilliagorillia79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: south carolina
Posts: 45
Default

only solid motor mounts will gain u any kind of hood clearance. and its about 1".. thats what i used on making my stock work on my 88 gt 351w
vanilliagorillia79 is offline  
Old 01-17-2009, 09:54 AM
  #18  
vanilliagorillia79
 
vanilliagorillia79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: south carolina
Posts: 45
Default

stock hood
vanilliagorillia79 is offline  
Old 01-19-2009, 06:34 PM
  #19  
1sinister93cobra
1st Gear Member
 
1sinister93cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Poplar Grove, Illinois
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by mrbigshot
1995 blocks are roller capable out of the box. they still use flat tappit's however. you can use your 302 roller parts for the conversion (lifters, dogbones, retainers). look for a f4te casting number. 1996 and newer 351w used the same block but came from the factory with roller cams.


the issue i see is the large valves on the afr 185 heads being an issue with stick pistons. check to see if there is sufficent valve clearence on the motor. this is where the 165's are used (same flow but they used smaller valves)

i am using an x-cam .544 lift with 1.7 rockers = .582 lift on stock lightning shortblock w/ 2.02 valves its all in the cam profile and timing as to wether the pistons will give the valves a kiss or not.
1sinister93cobra is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
mustangheaven
Motor Swap Section
3
01-03-2016 11:20 AM
kevsgt
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-09-2015 10:12 PM
guitarman376
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
09-30-2015 05:54 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-30-2015 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: 351W and AFR 185 heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.