Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang > 351 Mustang
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2012, 07:21 PM   #11
82 351 roller
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Vehicle: 82 ford mustang
Location: ontario
Posts: 12
Default

351 based engine is way to go i did the 347 aluminum head build was happy till friend built 351 .30 flat tops and dooe heads cost him less in long run and was quicker in 1/4 and 1/8 mile so built almost the same but roller and happier now
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
82 351 roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 07:25 AM   #12
supermod

 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Vehicle: 2007 Saleen Mustang 281 heritage-Edelbrock blower setup
Location: Florida
Posts: 13
Default 351 or 347

The rod angle is different on the two engines, and where they wiill want to make power in the RPM range is different. The 347 has the shorter rod, and will tend to wear out the bores sooner, needs a different cam . The 351w is a 9" deck block, main bearings are too big (Cleveland deck is lower, more on the order of a SBC, uses a shorter, lighter rod, still a much more longevity than the 347, and has smaller main journals than the 9" deck). If I had the choice, Id build a cleveland deck with the trick flow heads, roller rockers, good rods, custom pistons, flat tappet cam with even duration, 140lb seated springs, square deck the block, and balance and clearance everything, port match the intake, make sure that the exhaust has a reversion dam. Anyway, IMHO, the cleveland deck is better, lighter, piston/rod combo and pretty explosion proof. Just a thought
supermod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:01 AM   #13
Duncan_GT
4th Gear Member

 
Duncan_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Vehicle: 95 GT
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,353
Default

Wouldnt it cost significantly more to go w a Cleveland? Since all of the parts needing to be swapped will have to be custom made, like headers etc etc
__________________
1995 Mustang GT
1999 F150 Lariat 4x4

Soon to come: 393 stroker
351w bored .030, Probe Industries forged internals, Trickflow 205's, FTI custom cam, Trickflow R 90mm intake, Accufab 90mm TB, FRPP 42lb injectors, 1 3/4" custom Accufab LT's, 3" exhaust, MS2
Duncan_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 10:50 AM   #14
supermod

 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Vehicle: 2007 Saleen Mustang 281 heritage-Edelbrock blower setup
Location: Florida
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan_GT View Post
Wouldnt it cost significantly more to go w a Cleveland? Since all of the parts needing to be swapped will have to be custom made, like headers etc etc
The windsor heads will fit the cleveland block. If you are going to use a cleveland block you will need the cleveland crank or a motorsport crank clearanced for the block in front as the counterweight wont clear(ask me how I know this!). I think that a lot of manifolds will fit. Its not easy, but it will make for a lighter piston/rod/bobweight. If you arent going to put a ton of power thru it, the cleveland cast crank will work.. The headers should fit. If you use the cleveland heads, yes, you will have to use a header kit and make them up. I always like d the cleveland heads, they flow really well(almost too much) and they have canted valves. I dont know if they are superior to the Trick Flow, tho.
Aussie 2bbl heads have better flow as the ports are smaller, giving more velocity than 4bbl heads.
supermod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 02:02 PM   #15
white95gt
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Vehicle: 1995 mustang gt
Location: georgia
Posts: 29
Default

Im still in the debating stages as of now. Ive talked to a couple ppl and most of them tell me to just turbo my car and run it till it blows
white95gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 03:16 PM   #16
darkmach1
4th Gear Member
 
darkmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,403
Default

The way I see it it's 351w hands down. I've debated this in my head a thousand times and my conclusion is there's no way I'm going to spend the kind of money required for machining, parts plus putting together a 347 with a factory 302 block....F that!! I want to do it once so if I did I would have to go with a Dart block and that just throws the whole budget out of wack then the sound choise is the 351w, starting the project a step ahead of the 347.
__________________
2004 Eaton swapped Mach1....Sold
2007 Trailblazer SS................Current
1985 Mustang GT..................Current Nov 2012 ROTM

Last edited by darkmach1; 10-01-2012 at 04:50 PM.
darkmach1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 01:15 AM   #17
Christopher Mandingo Castro

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 95 Mustang GT
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4
Default

I think if you are considering 347 vs 351 and not the 351 stroker option the main benefit is strength. The 351 has 4ci more but also a larger heavier rotating mass. You can get away with a 185 head on the 351 easily. Basically whatever would work on the 347 will work on the 351 other than intake, oil pan, distributor and headers. Short block weight between the 2 is around 50lbs. Put your battery in the trunk and you will never feel the difference. Add aluminum heads and the nose will start getting lighter than stock.
Christopher Mandingo Castro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 05:25 PM   #18
89fiveeight
2nd Gear Member
 
89fiveeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Vehicle: 89 GT 5.8
Location: Virginia
Posts: 270
Default

351W all day. To build a 347 you're already going to have to pay for the stroker kit, pay for machining and assembly costs, unless you have the tech know how to assemble it properly yourself, and you wind up with a weaker block and still have 4 fewer cubes than me. Get your Windsor, if the bottom end is stout, leave it alone. A set of AFR 205's, a properly matched intake, and if its not a roller, pay the extra couple hundred for the retrofit lifters and pushrods. Get the right cam and you'll be making gobs of low end torque perfect for stoplight to stoplight raci... er... driving. Assuming you already have a 302 car, a Windsor will bolt right up to your tranny. You said you've got a year to do this, think about it and do it right.

Then again, I may just be biased.
__________________
89 GT 5.8 Budget Bruiser

351W .30 over, 3.73 Posi, Eddy Air Gap intake manifold, BBK shortys, fat cam, antique lifters, greedy carb, junkyard heads, black iron pipe roll cage, skeleton interior, angle iron dashboard
89fiveeight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 12:12 PM   #19
2008saleen
 
2008saleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Vehicle: 2008 Ford Mustang Saleen s281
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Default

From a cost standpoint it is a no brainer. 351w all the way. Just remember to use the best possibe main and rod bearings available. I would also use the best oil possible. Because the 351 was designed as a truck engine it has larger main journals. These do not like high rpm. Do not use any factory ford iron head. They are all junk. A good set of alum heads and the other basic internal up grades and you are on your way. I always wanted to build a 351w stroker for my but never did. To get 10 sec on a reliable daily driven car is going to be a litttle tricky without a good bit of $$$ invested.
__________________
There is nothing so simple that it can not be done wrong
2008saleen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 09:57 AM   #20
95 BLOWN GT
5th Gear Member

 
95 BLOWN GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 95 mustang gt
Location: buying tires!
Posts: 3,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by white95gt View Post
I'm building a 1/4 mile 10 sec street car I was told to build a 347 but why not just build a 351w with the heads cam intake and what not. Wouldn't the 351 make more power?
depending on your budget both engines will get you to where you want to go RIGHT NOW.If you want to go faster later...and you probably will...start out with a 351 .
__________________
4:10 eaton/moser rearend
upr front suspension
strange adjustable shocks/struts-battery in trunk
driveshaft loop - subframe connectors
10pt. chrome moly cage- rear seat delete-ultra lite gauges
wolfe rear suspension-torque boxes welded
400 turbo trans rev. man valve body trans brake
408 C.I.TURBO ENGINE
DART-CALLIES-OLIVER-ARP-MANLEY-SOLID CAM
95 BLOWN GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 09:57 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup