The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 4.0L V6 Specific General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2008, 07:55 PM   #21
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,194
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

uummm since when is dodge going to make a v6 challenger????...i know the charger comes in v6.....but i think the challenger will only be a v8......
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
phunnyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 07:58 PM   #22
landon.moss
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ankeny, ia
Posts: 428
Send a message via Yahoo to landon.moss
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

1st year all challengers will be hemi 8s with autos i believe....2nd prod year will include a v6, a de-tuned v8, and the addition of the manual trans
__________________
71 intense blue plymouth satellite 440
05 mineral grey ford mustang 4.0

landon.moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 08:04 PM   #23
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,194
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

great nows theres two cars i want in 2010....LOL>...the new stang and the challenger....need to start playing the lotto again
phunnyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 08:36 PM   #24
davesyo
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 327
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE


Quote:
ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
davesyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 09:35 PM   #25
StreamlineStang
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2007 SS Mustang V6 Premium
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 676
Send a message via AIM to StreamlineStang
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

It doesn't really matter on how many litters, my 96 Mitsubishi 3000GT (N/A DOHC V6) is a 3 litter and puts down 222hp at the crank. It's all in the design of the engines. Ford really hasn't made a LOT of changes to their motors over the years, at least compared to the other companies that is.
__________________
2007 SS Mustang V6 Premium
Gray Leather Interior, Manual, V6 PP, Interior Upgrade Package, 35/20 Tint, 14inch Shorty Antenna, Silver 17" Bullitts, GT Spoiler, GT M/T Muffler, CF dash, SR Window Louvers, Roush Retro Knob, Magnetic Blackout Panel, Bullitt Style Fuel Door, Shaker 500, And Some Sweet Mustang Floor Mats! Also had a Carbon Creations OEM CF Hood with Roush Louvers but they went up in flames along with my house on Nov. 4th 2008
StreamlineStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:04 PM   #26
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,194
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Quote:
ORIGINAL: davesyo


Quote:
ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
210 is at the crank....at the wheels its between 180 and 190....cai tune and sual will bring it to around 225 at the crank and probably about 200-210 at the wheels...this is based ona 5 % to 10% loss from the crank to the wheels...
phunnyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:08 PM   #27
07 Stang
5th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 3,722
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Quote:
ORIGINAL: phunnyguy

uummm since when is dodge going to make a v6 challenger????...i know the charger comes in v6.....but i think the challenger will only be a v8......
According to their website, they are coming out with a V6 dubbed the Challenger SE.

Check the link below;

http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen...rmance/engine/

It had this to say about the SE's engine;

3.5 liter High-Output SOHC V6
A dual-tuned intake manifold utilizes a short runner valve, bringing you 250 horses at 6800 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque at 3800 rpm. Partnered with a sophisticated electronic throttle control system that tailors the pedal-movement response based on operating conditions, plus platinum-tip spark plugs and the coil-on plug ignition system, you'll reap benefits like more consistent speed and reduced emissions. (standard on SE).



__________________
07 Stang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:09 PM   #28
The Potato
3rd Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
The Potato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang v6
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 559
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE



A CHALLENGER APPEARS!
__________________

2008 Mustang v6
- GT Rear Bumper, Roush 1/4 louvers
- FRPP Dual Exhaust
- C&L Intake w/ Bamachips tune
The Potato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:39 PM   #29
07lane40
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 931
Send a message via AIM to 07lane40
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Ratrodder85


I have checked out one of the first SRT8s and everything is amazing except the interior. It's boring and looks exactly like the Charger. Hopefully by the time they release other models such as the R/T and v6 next year they will fix that.
what about the open diff on the SRT8??? i dont get why you'd but an expensive high power car with an open diff.. ive seen pics of the car burning out with only one wheel spinning. hell even the base mustang GT has a posi rear...
__________________
07lane40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:44 PM   #30
07lane40
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 931
Send a message via AIM to 07lane40
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Quote:
ORIGINAL: phunnyguy

Quote:
ORIGINAL: davesyo


Quote:
ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
210 is at the crank....at the wheels its between 180 and 190....cai tune and sual will bring it to around 225 at the crank and probably about 200-210 at the wheels...this is based ona 5 % to 10% loss from the crank to the wheels...
there supposed to be a general rule of 15% drivetrain loss (20% for autos) which would lead one to think that our cars are underrated. 15 % would give you more like 220-225.
__________________
07lane40 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
09, 35l, 40, cai, challenger, challnger, charger, coupe, faster, modified, mustang, se, v, v6, versus

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company