The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > 4.0L V6 Specific General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-2009, 08:58 AM   #1
07 Stang
5th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 3,691
Default Paxton Vs X-Charger

So what's the price difference? I know the Paxton sells for $4499.99 and it comes with an intercooler. What gains in hp will we get?
What about the x-charger? Those of you with them please chime in.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
07 Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 09:34 AM   #2
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Legion5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: Saleen Thinger, Vert, Bike, Magic Pumpkin.
Location: Bright Springs Posts: 13,541
Posts: 2,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 07 Stang View Post
So what's the price difference? I know the Paxton sells for $4499.99 and it comes with an intercooler. What gains in hp will we get?
What about the x-charger? Those of you with them please chime in.
It's been proven by at least two different comparison threads which are backed up by dozens of people that intercooled centri superchargers are worse in every measurable and conceivable way to intercooled twin screw superchargers in applications for the mustang.

The x-charger should put out 340 hp at the crank though.

Now the x-charger isn't intercooled at that price range but the centri is. Based in intricately discussing the x-charger kit with the designer it's one of the best superchargers I've seen designed for the street. The paxton on the other hand looks like it was pulled out of some one's ass. It's shoddy design isn't that impressive compared to the v8 centris and even the Vortech kit for a Mazda3 looks better.

I wouldn't be surprised by looking at the ducting that the car makes even less than 10% less hp on the low end which is what paxton kits do with the v8's against twin screws, and it's not going to be as drivable as the x-charger which despite is high marks for power is primarily designed to be a safe and easy to live with setup.
__________________

::Cornering with the Tail Drifting at 110 mph::

Tip of the Month, October: Do not buy the $730 Roush Exhaust which a Mangnaflow rep says costs to $117 make (polished, all ss), buy the $170 Roush Exhaust Tips estimated to cost $46 to make and weld them to another company's muffler. This also lets you choose how your car sounds.

Rear seats, superior to carrying your children in your mouth. - Mustang vs Corvette slogan
Legion5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 09:53 AM   #3
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legion5 View Post
It's been proven by at least two different comparison threads which are backed up by dozens of people that intercooled centri superchargers are worse in every measurable and conceivable way to intercooled twin screw superchargers in applications for the mustang.

The x-charger should put out 340 hp at the crank though.

Now the x-charger isn't intercooled at that price range but the centri is. Based in intricately discussing the x-charger kit with the designer it's one of the best superchargers I've seen designed for the street. The paxton on the other hand looks like it was pulled out of some one's ass. It's shoddy design isn't that impressive compared to the v8 centris and even the Vortech kit for a Mazda3 looks better.

I wouldn't be surprised by looking at the ducting that the car makes even less than 10% less hp on the low end which is what paxton kits do with the v8's against twin screws, and it's not going to be as drivable as the x-charger which despite is high marks for power is primarily designed to be a safe and easy to live with setup.
VMP tunning has an 05 V6 with Vortech that dynoed at 395hp at the wheels (16psi ).
Good luck getting this with the X charger
I rode in the car... the ponies are there.
That car is a DD during the week and goes to the track on weekends.
It still has the stock engine.

Centris work well for DD if they're tune properly (the Vortech does anyway)


To the OP... You don't have to go radical with a Vortech system if you were to get one.
10 psi would give you about 300hp at the wheels while being very reliable.
The 4.0 mill has stronger internals than he 4.6 V8. That helps!
PM Rygen and anyone else that has a proven record with the V6 and you'll get the best advices on that subject...
__________________

Last edited by pascal; 04-27-2009 at 09:59 AM.
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 01:51 PM   #4
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 2006 Ford Mustang
Location: Southern California 805
Posts: 3,332
Default

seems to me that the X shouldnt be judged for the power output compared to the other SC's but on its different characteristics. really depends what you want out of your car. do i want the MOST power i can get or do i just want good solid competitive power with the characteristics i prefer? thats an important decision that needs to be made before laying down the cash.
__________________

'06 4.0 Stang :: Auto :: 3.73/T-Lok :: Aluminum D/S :: C&L Intake :: Bama Tuned
JBA H-Pipe Dual Exhaust :: JBA Shorty Headers :: GT Anti-Sway Bars w/ Poly Bushings
Sancho805 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 03:37 PM   #5
Mr. Ugly
2nd Gear Member
2007 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2007
Posts: 269
Default

Comments about a senior designer at Shelby's R&D:

Quote:
He was also extremely impressed with the linier torque curve of the X-Charger. He said that the Paxton / Vortex they use is tuned extremely aggressive and puts out 350RWHP but the power and torque don't even begin to come on as nice as the X-Charger.
http://www.mustangcollective.com/showthread.php?t=23893
__________________


2007 Satin Silver V6 / Explorer Express X-Charger #67 - HiPo 2.8

MSD, JBA, FRPP GTA duals, Zabteck, J&M, Steeda, Tokico d-spec, H&R SS, Eibach, Shaftmasters, 8.8, t-lok, 3.73, OE Wheels Cobra R 18x9/10, Nitto 555 255/285
Mr. Ugly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 05:03 PM   #6
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Legion5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: Saleen Thinger, Vert, Bike, Magic Pumpkin.
Location: Bright Springs Posts: 13,541
Posts: 2,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pascal View Post
VMP tunning has an 05 V6 with Vortech that dynoed at 395hp at the wheels (16psi ).
Good luck getting this with the X charger
I rode in the car... the ponies are there.
That car is a DD during the week and goes to the track on weekends.
It still has the stock engine.

Centris work well for DD if they're tune properly (the Vortech does anyway)


To the OP... You don't have to go radical with a Vortech system if you were to get one.
10 psi would give you about 300hp at the wheels while being very reliable.
The 4.0 mill has stronger internals than he 4.6 V8. That helps!
PM Rygen and anyone else that has a proven record with the V6 and you'll get the best advices on that subject...
I can't find that despite trying so I'll assume that was with a car that had every other mod possible.

The same can be said about the x-charger if you combined the gains proven from the intercooler with the fastest ever 15 PSI x-charger cars which had everything too, doing that you get 400 RWHP.

Either way both of these options are well out of his price range but the 400 RWHP x-charger would consistently beat the vortech because even if it's RWHP number were way higher, the cetri system is so peaky that it's dyno numbers are a poor comparison to anything else because you're never going to use 85% of that. This is a pretty standard rule.

What I'm trying to say is that even though the x-charger isn't some maximum horsepower monger, it's still going to be faster being significantly under and and be very competetive.
__________________

::Cornering with the Tail Drifting at 110 mph::

Tip of the Month, October: Do not buy the $730 Roush Exhaust which a Mangnaflow rep says costs to $117 make (polished, all ss), buy the $170 Roush Exhaust Tips estimated to cost $46 to make and weld them to another company's muffler. This also lets you choose how your car sounds.

Rear seats, superior to carrying your children in your mouth. - Mustang vs Corvette slogan
Legion5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 05:14 PM   #7
mustangpogi
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 152
Default

Get a Paxton if you want power for your money. X is good if you want extra power for your V6 but it's not going to be faster than the GT. For the price and HP gain, Paxton but for extra power for you 6 then get an X-charger.

Last edited by mustangpogi; 04-27-2009 at 05:18 PM.
mustangpogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 05:27 PM   #8
07 Stang
5th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 3,691
Default

So what is the price of the X charger now? Does it come with an intercooler?
__________________
07 Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 06:29 PM   #9
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legion5 View Post

What I'm trying to say is that even though the x-charger isn't some maximum horsepower monger, it's still going to be faster being significantly under and and be very competetive.
Like mentioned before, the x-charger will come on sooner on torque...
That's the caracteristic of the screw type.

I sure am not an expert on all this, so I'm not going to argue with anyone here.
I just know the basic principles, that's about it.

If it's any help, the fastest supercharged 4.0s seems to be the Vortech cars...

It doesn't really matter, because the OP isn't looking for a maximum HP, if not, she would have gotten a V8 to begin with I assume...
I believe the Vortech/Paxton and X-Charger with conservative boost, would make her happy.
__________________
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 06:35 PM   #10
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangpogi View Post
Get a Paxton if you want power for your money. X is good if you want extra power for your V6 but it's not going to be faster than the GT. For the price and HP gain, Paxton but for extra power for you 6 then get an X-charger.

Errr, it doesn't take a lot of boost on a sixxer to smoke a stock GT with any brand superchargers...
__________________
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2005, 40, charger, intercooler, mustang, paxton, v6, versus, video, vortech, xcharger

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company