disappointed with dyno #'s
#1
disappointed with dyno #'s
I put my v6 on the dyno this morning and am fairly disappointed with the numbers I got. I wanted to get a "before" number because I am stongly thinking of Xcharging in the next month and a half or so. I have a couple questions...
What is the procedure as far as running on the dyno? My car is an "auto" so do I just put it in "D" and run it up with the OD off or run it in 3rd? The dyno guy wanted to run it in 3rd, but I wonder if I would have gotten better numbers the other way.
Knowing that a "mustang dyno" gives smaller numbers, that is what I used. My tuner likes working with that dyno person and a dynojet is kinda hard to find around here. The guy told me that a dynojet will say about 10-20 more hp.
I ran 139 hp and 161 trq on the ground. My car is an 06 V6, and has a CAI with a 93 "street" Bama tune, 3.73s, and dual exhaust. I was expecting close to 200 hp.
Anybody have a similiar setup that has been on a dyno to compare to (dynojet or MD)? If I go with the Xtreme Xcharger (which is what I've wanted), what do you guys think I will net in the end?
I have read posts on here of people in the 300-350 range with the Xcharger Xtreme and I find it hard to believe that with a start of 139 hp that I will even get close to that.
Any info you folks can give would be nice...
Josh
What is the procedure as far as running on the dyno? My car is an "auto" so do I just put it in "D" and run it up with the OD off or run it in 3rd? The dyno guy wanted to run it in 3rd, but I wonder if I would have gotten better numbers the other way.
Knowing that a "mustang dyno" gives smaller numbers, that is what I used. My tuner likes working with that dyno person and a dynojet is kinda hard to find around here. The guy told me that a dynojet will say about 10-20 more hp.
I ran 139 hp and 161 trq on the ground. My car is an 06 V6, and has a CAI with a 93 "street" Bama tune, 3.73s, and dual exhaust. I was expecting close to 200 hp.
Anybody have a similiar setup that has been on a dyno to compare to (dynojet or MD)? If I go with the Xtreme Xcharger (which is what I've wanted), what do you guys think I will net in the end?
I have read posts on here of people in the 300-350 range with the Xcharger Xtreme and I find it hard to believe that with a start of 139 hp that I will even get close to that.
Any info you folks can give would be nice...
Josh
#2
...so they did run it in 3rd? IIRC you have a 5 speed transmission meaning 4th would be a better gear, but running it in a lower gear would mean lower #'s I think (hope someone can confirm this).
Was the outside/shop temperature hot? How many miles are on your car?
Was the outside/shop temperature hot? How many miles are on your car?
#3
When you just use "drive", the car will downshift from 4th to 3rd gear, which is not the 1:1 gear ratio. As well, the converter needs to be locked, otherwise it will lose power through the converter. You can call Bama, and they'll take your tune and just make it a "dyno lock" file, for use strictly on the dyno. It will keep the car from downshifting to third, upshifting to 5th, and lock the converter. You can then load your normal tune when you're off the dyno.
It's going to completely change your numbers, they'll be much better. That, plus it being a Mustang dyno - those numbers are going to be way lower than a 4th gear/converter locked pull on a Dynojet.
It's going to completely change your numbers, they'll be much better. That, plus it being a Mustang dyno - those numbers are going to be way lower than a 4th gear/converter locked pull on a Dynojet.
#4
i have the same mods as you except im using the race tune and dont have gears, and on a dynojet in very hot tx heat i did 201 and 204 about a year apart (it was hotter during the 201 run). so yea i would say somethings off. and IMO i think its weird your tuner didnt know about the converter locking tune but that might just be me
#6
i have the same mods as you except im using the race tune and dont have gears, and on a dynojet in very hot tx heat i did 201 and 204 about a year apart (it was hotter during the 201 run). so yea i would say somethings off. and IMO i think its weird your tuner didnt know about the converter locking tune but that might just be me
I will be talking with him about locking it in 4th though. Thanks for the reply, I was really looking for somebody like you that had the same mods to compare with.
#7
When you just use "drive", the car will downshift from 4th to 3rd gear, which is not the 1:1 gear ratio. As well, the converter needs to be locked, otherwise it will lose power through the converter. You can call Bama, and they'll take your tune and just make it a "dyno lock" file, for use strictly on the dyno. It will keep the car from downshifting to third, upshifting to 5th, and lock the converter. You can then load your normal tune when you're off the dyno.
It's going to completely change your numbers, they'll be much better. That, plus it being a Mustang dyno - those numbers are going to be way lower than a 4th gear/converter locked pull on a Dynojet.
It's going to completely change your numbers, they'll be much better. That, plus it being a Mustang dyno - those numbers are going to be way lower than a 4th gear/converter locked pull on a Dynojet.
Thanks again Chris
He has never dynoed an Xcharged mustang, but he wants too, so maybe
#8
Oh, and nice avatar.
#9
Well guys, I took Chris's advice and got the dyno locked tune from BAMA and went back for another shot. I ended up with 207 hp and 220 tq, thats after temp and humidity correction. Also this is on a MD so the numbers may have been a little higher had it been a dynojet.
Those numbers sound better and I will use them as a baseline for after my Xtreme.
Those numbers sound better and I will use them as a baseline for after my Xtreme.