The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-08-2006, 12:45 AM   #1
XxphantomsnypzxX
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 942
Default forget the 4.6 2v

Im just kinda mad at the whole 2v 4.6. It's so dumb how Maros can make so much more power, and can handle more power without forged internals. grrrrrr
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
XxphantomsnypzxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:46 AM   #2
JonBeast
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,616
Send a message via AIM to JonBeast
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Ok? Once again....another worthless thread.
__________________
JonBeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:46 AM   #3
kcp1989
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 2002 ford mustang gt
Location:
Posts: 860
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

yup they have much higher compression ratios
__________________
2002 gt 5 spd

hurst short throw
mac o/r x pipe
hurst short throw
SLP LM2 catback
18x8 roush rims
granetelli upper and lower control arms
Prothane total bushing kit
bbk lowering springs
Dynotune wet kit (100 shot)
spec stage 2+ clutch
in need of traction....
kcp1989 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:46 AM   #4
racer02GTstang
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville/Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 4,675
Send a message via AIM to racer02GTstang
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

are you talking about camaros?
__________________
2002 GT ragtop 5-spd

HP stage 2 twin turbo kit
forged shortblock from MMR
VT stage 3 blower cams
stage 3 ported heads w/ oversized valves
built TKO500
P-51
+ alot more

693rwhp 608 toque w/ a slipping clutch and 18psi. on pump gas
racer02GTstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:48 AM   #5
Slick97gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 342
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Then quit crying and buy a camaro.
__________________
1997 Mustang Gt, 5 speed
Slick97gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:49 AM   #6
XxphantomsnypzxX
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 942
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

yea or alot of engines that arent even V8s! I dont get why Ford has been holding back so much, a lot of cars are making around the same hp as a 99-04 GT, the difference, those imports havbe 6 cylinders. Like wtf?!?!?!? grr idk why it makes me so mad. I just feel like Ford cheated us all.
XxphantomsnypzxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:49 AM   #7
SOHCtimes2
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,375
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Code should hopefully be here soon to delete this retarded thread...
SOHCtimes2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:50 AM   #8
03sonicgt
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkley, Michigan
Posts: 2,710
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Buy a camaro then.
__________________
*2003 Sonic Blue Mustang GT
-Full Bolt-ons and a 100 shot.
03sonicgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:53 AM   #9
racer02GTstang
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville/Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 4,675
Send a message via AIM to racer02GTstang
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v

dont forget that a camaro comes with a 281 while the camaro comes with a 350... thats a big difference in motor size.... and to let ya know... the mustang has a more power to cubic inch than a camaro does... atleast thats what i just figured....
__________________
2002 GT ragtop 5-spd

HP stage 2 twin turbo kit
forged shortblock from MMR
VT stage 3 blower cams
stage 3 ported heads w/ oversized valves
built TKO500
P-51
+ alot more

693rwhp 608 toque w/ a slipping clutch and 18psi. on pump gas
racer02GTstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 12:54 AM   #10
JonBeast
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,616
Send a message via AIM to JonBeast
Default RE: forget the 4.6 2v


Quote:
ORIGINAL: XxphantomsnypzxX

yea or alot of engines that arent even V8s! I dont get why Ford has been holding back so much, a lot of cars are making around the same hp as a 99-04 GT, the difference, those imports havbe 6 cylinders. Like wtf?!?!?!? grr idk why it makes me so mad. I just feel like Ford cheated us all.
A mustang wasn't built from the factory to compete with the camaro's performance wise. And what is ford supposed to do about the new cars? Go back in time and make the 2v 4.6 better? No

Thats why they made the new 3v, to get better performance.

Get over it.
__________________
JonBeast is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2v, 46, 60s, bbond007, built, cams, comparison, ford, manchester, modular, muffler, nh, power, swap, sweet, thunder, tune

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company