The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2009, 11:44 PM   #1
J_Rod
2nd Gear Member
 
J_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 96 Mustang GT
Location: South East Indiana
Posts: 351
Default 5.4 Swap Whats all involved?

So the oil pump went out on my 4.6 and basically I didnt catch it until it was to late. I was looking at the MMR 5.4 Short Block and HPS 5.4 Intake. Reason being is the 5.4 is priced the same as the 4.6 short block.

Downside is I want to use my NPI heads (going to port them) I know PI heads are better but I believe the NPI heads can be reworked to flow as good as Ported PI heads.

How tight of a fit is the engine? Are there hood clearance issues? Will I have to change my mid pipe and shorty headers? What needs to be done to the computer?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
96 Laser Red GT TR-3650 trans, Roush short throw shifter. FRPP handling package. In the works is a supercharged teksid 32v.
J_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 01:31 AM   #2
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 1996 Mustang Cobra
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,254
Default

just build the 4.6... the only way i could see the 5.4 being benifical is if you plan to go all motor... which you should just go pushrod for lol the 5.4 will see a bit more torque but i think the general consenus is its just not worth it. AmoosenamedHank always answers these threads lol.

i do belive you will need a new hood due to clearence issues.
__________________


Fastest Closet on MustangForums.

I bought a goldfish, named it after my ex-girlfriend, and let it die. It's really the little things in life.
SVTeeshirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:57 AM   #3
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,639
Default

depends I think its worth it in respect to how much the 4.6 already costs. But everything about it is about the same, except a new K member is pretty much required and that will help with clearance issues, the new intakes make it easier to try and retain a stock hood or a small cowl
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 10:16 AM   #4
mustangman281
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: tn
Posts: 0
Default

Not worth it unless you use 4v heads.
mustangman281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 11:20 AM   #5
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Vehicle: 1996 GT
Location: MN
Posts: 3,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman281 View Post
Not worth it unless you use 4v heads.
The swap may not be worth it if you already have a running engine. But if you're looking at a situation where you have nothing, and you can start fresh with either a 5.4 or a 4.6, I really don't think it's that out of the picture.

The swap is easy, especially if you use the HPS intake.... I would advice against using the NPI heads because you will need to either by the intake adapters to fun a PI intake(what the HPS intake is) to NPI heads. Or you're going to have to RTV the **** out of it and hope it doesn't leak.

PI heads are cheap, just pick yourself up a pair.

A k member isn't a must but it sure makes everything a lot easier. You'll have to either run shorty headers or custom long tubes. I hear the HPS intake, you will clear a stock hood.
__________________
amoosenamedhank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:56 PM   #6
J_Rod
2nd Gear Member
 
J_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 96 Mustang GT
Location: South East Indiana
Posts: 351
Default

I was looking at the HPS intake, and the local salvage yard has a 2002 5.4 with 65,000 miles on its out of an explorer. I pulled the engine today and pulled the heads off and the block is absolutely garbage. It has some real deep gouges in the cylinder bores and an .040 or .060 overbore wont cut it so a new block is in order.
__________________
96 Laser Red GT TR-3650 trans, Roush short throw shifter. FRPP handling package. In the works is a supercharged teksid 32v.
J_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 08:11 PM   #7
sleeping stallion
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,161
Default

why 4v heads lightning have 2v heads. i seen and talked to this guy at the track he had a striaght lightning motor swap 5.4 he said very easy install minor mods to make it fit. k member fits good with that motor. i wouldnt buils a 5.4 2v all motor unless im gonna spray or something. i have a fully built 2v on bottle
__________________
2002 GT auto silver /black
11.6 at 122 with 1.78 60 ft
stock auto tranny stock suspension and stock bottom end.
sleeping stallion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 11:45 PM   #8
J_Rod
2nd Gear Member
 
J_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 96 Mustang GT
Location: South East Indiana
Posts: 351
Default

I went to the salvage yard this morning. The engine was still in the vehicle and the vehicle turned out to be a an expedition with VIN L so its the 5.4 and it has 64,873 on it and it sounded like it ran pretty good, no ticks or anything. I asked if all of the accessories came with it and they did so I went ahead and bought it. They wanted me to take the transmission for an additional $200 but I told them too keep it. I also ordered a K-member from PA Racing. When I install the engine I will take the time to fabricate a single turbo system.
__________________
96 Laser Red GT TR-3650 trans, Roush short throw shifter. FRPP handling package. In the works is a supercharged teksid 32v.

Last edited by J_Rod; 03-29-2009 at 12:06 AM.
J_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:52 AM   #9
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleeping stallion View Post
why 4v heads lightning have 2v heads. i seen and talked to this guy at the track he had a striaght lightning motor swap 5.4 he said very easy install minor mods to make it fit. k member fits good with that motor. i wouldnt buils a 5.4 2v all motor unless im gonna spray or something. i have a fully built 2v on bottle
240 cfm v. 160cfm... and once ported 320 cfm v. 235 cfm... thats why

but the 4v head argument goes for 4.6's also... PIs just plain suck
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 02:34 PM   #10
J_Rod
2nd Gear Member
 
J_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 96 Mustang GT
Location: South East Indiana
Posts: 351
Default

I would have rather gone with a 4v but the price was right on the 5.4 2v, and I am going to have some machine work done to the engine. I thought a 2v would be easier since my GT is a 2v and it will keep the computer happy since there is a lot more involved with a 4v, however if anyone knows anyone selling a pair of 4v heads I would be interested. I am planning on bolting up a single turbo to it.
__________________
96 Laser Red GT TR-3650 trans, Roush short throw shifter. FRPP handling package. In the works is a supercharged teksid 32v.
J_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
46, 54, block, engine, ford, forum, gt, intake, kit, mmr, mustang, s197, short, swap, turbo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company