You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
I recently came across an 88mm pro m MAF which says on it that it is calibrated for 19lb injectors. I have 19lb on my car still, and was wondering if I would get any decent performance boost from the 88mm maf. I currently have a bbk cai and free flow exhaust, as well as a jet stage 2 chip. I was told by several guys at the drag strip that an MAF upgrade is what I am missing. agree or disagree? the research I have done online shows mixed opinions. some seem to think it will cause detonation....(im thinking with the stage 2 chip reprogram that I will be fine)
again the sticker says it is calibrated for my stock injectors.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
You aren't maxing the capacity of your stock MAF so I don't think an aftermarket one is going to do anything.
__________________
2000 Ford Mustang GT
Vortech V1 S Trim
JE 194329 Forged Pistons
CRS 5933F30 Forged Rods
Fel-Pro Gaskets & Bolts
Ford Racing 11" Clutch
Sniper Tuned
Pypes Violators
Mac Prochamber
B&M Shifter
Subframe Connectors
The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.
Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
I wonder why those dudes were so insistent on me changing out my maf. they both ran mustangs too. I think they were saying that with my CAI that the stock MAF body was the smallest and more restrictive part of the intake. Does that make any sense?
upgrading to a larger throttle body and plenum is a good idea though correct?
is there any reason to upgrade to a bigger MAF without changing the 19lb injectors?
I have an eaton m90 I was going to try and put on soon.
__________________
2000 gt
BBK Cold Air intake
Stage 2 Jet chip
Flow masters
4.10 gears (wow I love these)
solid axle swap
Stalker Body kit
The upper plenum is the most restrictive component of the stock intake, with the TB being second--read more about this here. There is no need for a larger MAF for any n/a application.
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
I saw a company (bbk) on the internet who has a one peice plenum and t body. it is 78mm. will this be too big for my car and hurt output? I am hoping to put a supercharger that a bought on the car eventually and was hoping to "grow into" this 78mm. thoughts?
__________________
2000 gt
BBK Cold Air intake
Stage 2 Jet chip
Flow masters
4.10 gears (wow I love these)
solid axle swap
Stalker Body kit
It won't hurt performance, it also won't help performance. as compared to any of the other after market TB/plenum combinations--unless you are running some incredible level of boost it's mostly a marketing gimmick...
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.
Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
I bet the OP wishes he could just memorize that and spout it back at the schmucks at the track that are living in 80's w/ the 5.slows
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company