The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-24-2009, 11:06 AM   #1
ledee416
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2000 mustang gt
Location: florida
Posts: 7
Default 88mm pro m MAF on 2000 gt?

hey guys,

I recently came across an 88mm pro m MAF which says on it that it is calibrated for 19lb injectors. I have 19lb on my car still, and was wondering if I would get any decent performance boost from the 88mm maf. I currently have a bbk cai and free flow exhaust, as well as a jet stage 2 chip. I was told by several guys at the drag strip that an MAF upgrade is what I am missing. agree or disagree? the research I have done online shows mixed opinions. some seem to think it will cause detonation....(im thinking with the stage 2 chip reprogram that I will be fine)

again the sticker says it is calibrated for my stock injectors.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
ledee416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 11:53 AM   #2
vanquish
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 2000 Mustang GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,137
Default

You aren't maxing the capacity of your stock MAF so I don't think an aftermarket one is going to do anything.
__________________
2000 Ford Mustang GT
Vortech V1 S Trim
JE 194329 Forged Pistons
CRS 5933F30 Forged Rods
Fel-Pro Gaskets & Bolts
Ford Racing 11" Clutch
Sniper Tuned
Pypes Violators
Mac Prochamber
B&M Shifter
Subframe Connectors
vanquish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 12:55 PM   #3
mrtstang
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2004, Ford, Mustang Gt
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,863
Default

It won't do anything for your performance. You'd be taking a gamble for no benefit. Don't even consider it.
__________________
2004 DSG Mustang Gt, BBK long tubes, BBK catted h pipe, SSS Terminator Catback, K&N cai, Steeda UDP's, Accufab 75mm tb/plenum, FRPP aluminum ds, Motive 3.90 gear, Alternative Auto custom tune, Steeda Tri-Ax, DD black bullitts w/315's Nitto 555R's, & 100 shot N20. 269/305 na, 373/528 N20
mrtstang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 01:14 PM   #4
lizzyfan
Made Moderator
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 98 GT Blumurder
Location: Helaware
Posts: 11,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtstang View Post
It won't do anything for your performance. You'd be taking a gamble for no benefit. Don't even consider it.
Correct!
__________________

Tuned by Matt at Performance Evolution
432 rwhp
426 tq

DD-2008 Mazda3 Zoom Zoom!
1996-Ranger (AKA "Barney") RIP 305K!
lizzyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 02:00 PM   #5
cliffyk
5th Gear Member
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,290
Default

The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.

Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 03:39 PM   #6
ledee416
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2000 mustang gt
Location: florida
Posts: 7
Default

hmmmm... ok thanks for the info.

I wonder why those dudes were so insistent on me changing out my maf. they both ran mustangs too. I think they were saying that with my CAI that the stock MAF body was the smallest and more restrictive part of the intake. Does that make any sense?

upgrading to a larger throttle body and plenum is a good idea though correct?

is there any reason to upgrade to a bigger MAF without changing the 19lb injectors?

I have an eaton m90 I was going to try and put on soon.
__________________
2000 gt
BBK Cold Air intake
Stage 2 Jet chip
Flow masters
4.10 gears (wow I love these)
solid axle swap
Stalker Body kit
ledee416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 05:04 PM   #7
cliffyk
5th Gear Member
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,290
Default

The upper plenum is the most restrictive component of the stock intake, with the TB being second--read more about this here. There is no need for a larger MAF for any n/a application.
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 08:42 PM   #8
ledee416
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 2000 mustang gt
Location: florida
Posts: 7
Default

I saw a company (bbk) on the internet who has a one peice plenum and t body. it is 78mm. will this be too big for my car and hurt output? I am hoping to put a supercharger that a bought on the car eventually and was hoping to "grow into" this 78mm. thoughts?
__________________
2000 gt
BBK Cold Air intake
Stage 2 Jet chip
Flow masters
4.10 gears (wow I love these)
solid axle swap
Stalker Body kit
ledee416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 08:52 PM   #9
cliffyk
5th Gear Member
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,290
Default

It won't hurt performance, it also won't help performance. as compared to any of the other after market TB/plenum combinations--unless you are running some incredible level of boost it's mostly a marketing gimmick...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 12:04 AM   #10
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,860
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cliffyk View Post
The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.

Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
I bet the OP wishes he could just memorize that and spout it back at the schmucks at the track that are living in 80's w/ the 5.slows
sxynerd is online now   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2000, code, gt, ledee416, maf, mustang, stock

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company