The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2009, 06:37 PM   #11
jtfrog
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicle: 2001 Mustang GT
Location: CA
Posts: 238
Default

I put on 1" looks good
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
[img][/img]
2001 GT Mineral Grey
5 sp
Steeda shifter
Drop in K&N
Rear 1" wheel spacers
Mach 1 chin spoiler
Drop 1" rear 1.75" front
Gas pedal mod.
jtfrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:02 PM   #12
Jazzer The Cat
Wheels/Tires Section Moderator
2002 Ford Mustang
 
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '02 s281 #0014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimlightningmcnulty View Post
I cant see what you think 'won't work' about it, if he buys 1.5" hubcentric spacers and there is bodywork rubbing issues then you have the bodywork adjusted accordingly, by flaring/rolling the arches.

and what exactly don't you see as being safe, THERE IS NO SAFETY ISSUE WITH HUBCENTRIC SPACERS, I have many friends who race cars back home one of them being a rally car and they all use/have used hubcentric spacers in the past with no issue, you will never put as much stress on your car as a rally driven car has, in addition to that i used drift a 240 back home with spacer shims about 1/4" and never had a problem.

a hubcentric spacer is exactly the same as having a larger offset wheel all you have to make sure of is that you have the correct size spigot rings (thats what its called in the uk)

P.s. i ordered 1.5" hubcentric spacers to solve a rubbing issue on my Bullitt 2 days ago and i will be drifting it, it wont be a problem.
So let me get this straight... You are willing to say the OP can just get some bodywork and roll the fenders so he can run a 1.5" spacer? Is he willing to do so? I am not saying they won't fit, I am saying without additional knowledge, how do you know they WILL fit?

I realize you meant no harm when recommended a 1.5" spacer. The problem here is, he may have done just that and bought some on your recommendation. I am not going to get holier-than-thou, but is an example of how forums can lead people to make incorrect decisions. I figure it is safe to say the OP does not plan on fender work, so not quite so quick to "volunteer" him for such a job Who knows, they may fit, but a bummer to buy them only to later find they won't.

In reguards to safety.... there are two types of spacers one can use for the OP's concern. The first is to install longer lug-bolts and what I have done to run the 1/2" spacers out back on my wheels. The second is to purchase spacers such as those pictured below:


Personally, I am not a fan of such a spacer, weather they are on rally cars or not.... weather they are hub-centric or not. I think it a bad idea to have lug-nuts covered and inaccessable to confirm they are tight without removing the wheel. You may be comfortable with such a thick spacer and covered lug-nuts, maybe even the OP.... but I am not, so I don't recommend them.

Jazzer
Jazzer The Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:27 PM   #13
kimlightningmcnulty
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: tbc
Location: california
Posts: 21
Default

If you do the body work what else is going to effect the fit, nothing.

so if you he read my post he would understand that in buying 1.5" spacers he may need additional body work to make them work, i don't see how that could lead to him making a poor descision.

with regards your comments about spacers, hubcentric spacers are far safer than the shim type, you have to understand that your wheel is not supposed to 'sit' your cars weight on you lugs it is supposed to 'sit' on the small ring that protrudes from your hubs the lugs are only supposed to hold the wheel against the hub and allow the hubs to transfer the force to the wheels.

if you sit all of the weight of your car on its lugs you will end up with elongated lug holes in your wheels thats why when you buy the hubcentric ones they have the 'ring' for the wheels to sit on, not only is it safer but its the way your wheels and hubs were designed to be used in the first place.

i think that at 1/2" spacers you should be fine but it is possible to get spiggot extenders so that you can have the origional spigot ring from your hub still seat properly in your wheel, i would strongly suggest you get these.

once again i want you to understand the if you use hubcentric spacers it is no different to using a wheel with a different offset.

Finally, you are always advised to torque your lugs up to the specified amount then drive for about 700 miles and then re-torque them if you follow this they will not come loose, the lug nuts are cut to the same conical shape as the wheels and hubcentric spacers thats why they don't come loose and why you should always use the correct lug nuts wheels and spacers for your car!

thanks

kim
kimlightningmcnulty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 11:30 PM   #14
CopNaStang
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT Coupe
Location: Indiana
Posts: 80
Default

I believe Jazzer is a suspension/wheel Guru, so even though I am willing to use the newer style spacers (due to ease), I am sure he is correct.
At what point would people need to roll fenders on the SN95's? I see alot of people with 1-1.5" spacers or 10-10.5" wheels on back and havent heard anyone having to roll their fenders for fitment.
__________________
2004 Mustang GT, 5 spd, Shadow Grey, 14K original miles.
CopNaStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 11:51 PM   #15
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,783
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

I ran 11" with 335's and didn't have to roll my fenders. I just dimpled my quad shock and bent my exhaust pipe over a bit.
sxynerd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:09 AM   #16
Tim99GT
4th Gear Member
1999 Ford Mustang
 
Tim99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicle: 1999 Mustang GT
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sxynerd View Post
I ran 11" with 335's and didn't have to roll my fenders. I just dimpled my quad shock and bent my exhaust pipe over a bit.
Got pics?? What style rim? 17" or 18"?
__________________


KENNE BELL 2.1L = SOLD
KENNE BELL 2.8H = Waiting to be installed

Aftermarket parts for sale - http://mustangforums.com/forum/new-e...ts-4-sale.html
Tim99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:24 AM   #17
dStuck
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: 1998 Ford Mustang GT
Location: California
Posts: 122
Default

yeah if i have to i have no problem doing some body work. but i'll probally get the hubcyntric style spacers because i have friends with trucks who use them and i would trust them better. and because i need at least 1 1/4" and if i need to go a little wider can just do a 1/4" shim right?
__________________
'98 Mustang GT

Steeda Tri-Ax shifter/ CAI, Mach 1 Knob
CORBEAU CR1 seats/ 4 point harness
17" BLK Cobra & 18" BLK SVT wheels
3:73 gears, MagnaFlow Exhaust
Stalker/Xenon , MSD ignition

SOON TO BE WHITE...
dStuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:54 AM   #18
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,783
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim99GT View Post
Got pics?? What style rim? 17" or 18"?
No, I had a nail go through the sidewall and 315's where a better buy. 335's are just overkill.

these are the 315's on the 11" wheel. The fronts are 9.5" wide with 275's.


These are 335's on a stock Saleen wheels that was widened to 11".
sxynerd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 02:15 AM   #19
kimlightningmcnulty
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: tbc
Location: california
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CopNaStang View Post
I believe Jazzer is a suspension/wheel Guru, so even though I am willing to use the newer style spacers (due to ease), I am sure he is correct.
At what point would people need to roll fenders on the SN95's? I see alot of people with 1-1.5" spacers or 10-10.5" wheels on back and havent heard anyone having to roll their fenders for fitment.
yeah i've read some of his stuff too and it is great.

however hubcentric is not the new un-tested easy way of doing it, its the right way, everyone is going to have different opinions on things like this but fact is fact, hubcentric are the correct and more professional and safer way to do it.

there is not really a point that you can say you'll need bodywork adjustments because there are so many variables, tire size, ride hight, spring rates etc, but if you drive down the road and it rubs you need your arches rolled ha ha
kimlightningmcnulty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 08:51 PM   #20
CopNaStang
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT Coupe
Location: Indiana
Posts: 80
Default

very true. Like I said, I feel comfortable using them. I dont race or anything, just the occassional WOT for funs sake

So with an 18x10 with a 295/35/18 tire in the rear there should be no rubbing on quad shocks or outter fender? ANd with a 1" spacer on stock 17x8's with stock 245/45/17, there should also be no rubbing at the outter fender?
__________________
2004 Mustang GT, 5 spd, Shadow Grey, 14K original miles.
CopNaStang is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
105, 17, 315, flush, gt, make, mustang, needed, older, rear, rims, spacers, tire, wheel, wheels

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company