4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

[Deleted]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2004, 01:44 AM
  #11  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

https://mustangforums.com/fb.asp?m=152334&key=

just posted this a few mins ago. check it out.

Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger
Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger Densecharger


lolz
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 02:01 AM
  #12  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 02:36 AM
  #13  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

I am very pleased with my C&L system. Here are a few pics:

[IMG]local://upfiles/4605/Ax728065473.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/4605/Ni232115638.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/4605/Wc772767276.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/4605/Tn324039340.jpg[/IMG]
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 01:15 PM
  #14  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 02:25 PM
  #15  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

ORIGINAL: DILOstang01

how much did the C&L kit cost for you 2000GT4.6?
$531.86 was the cost of the mam, inlet pipe, upper plenum, and k&N. The T/B was 184.94

So total, if you do everything from filter to upper plenum, was 716.80
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 02:46 PM
  #16  
04mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
04mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 837
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

i got the maf kit and inlet pipe for $350 thats from the air box up to the TB and plenum. i got it from www.crmotorsports.com
04mustang is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 03:01 PM
  #17  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

I paid $339.00 for everything for my densecharge, same stuff as 04's setup with C&L. www.densecharger.com

Thats $339.00 for the full kit + the 85mm ProM mass air meter

I think you have to decide between an extra couple horsies with densecharger or better looks with C&L

but I know 04's gonna disagree :P
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 05:58 PM
  #18  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 06-03-2004, 06:42 PM
  #19  
04mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
04mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 837
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

ha ha ha h a ha ha ah lol . we have to dyno these set ups dam it. lol im sure they are close just go what u think is the best for u man price seems pritty close. u cant beat the price i got for the set up. i got it that cheap cause it was a package deal. the inlet pipe goes for like almost 200 alone on some sites. i got mine for 100 and the maf kit for like 250. the maf kit was cheeper to. i saved 150 or more buying the whole thing . but if u go C&L go to crmotorspports thats where the package deal is. ohh and its free shipping with cr.
04mustang is offline  
Old 06-04-2004, 02:45 AM
  #20  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: C&L vs. Densecharger

I dont think the densecharger is going to be that much cheaper, and I absolutly dont beileve it makes more HP. The C&L system was completly dyno tested thru and thru, and there isnt anything I saw that could have been done better or with more quailty.

Remeber that my price was not only for the K&N, mass airflow, and inlet pipe, but a throttle body and a upper plenum as well. The price of the T/B and upper plenum is not included in the Denscharger kit/price (it wasnt in the C&L kit either, had to order seperately). I recommend C&L all the way, I can't wait for them to come out with their new lower intake (although it will prolly be 1500 bucks )

Prices seperatly (direct from my email invoice) :

C&L 4.6 Intake Plenum, 96-2001* GT: $169.99

C&L 80mm Mass Air System & Inlet Pipe, 1999-2001 Mustang Free Shipping! : $355.99 (this is the K&N, MAM, inlet pipe, and all connection hardware)

BBK 70mm Throttle Body for 96-04 Ford Mustang w/4.6L 2v: $184.94
2000GT4.6 is offline  


Quick Reply: [Deleted]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.