4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Camaro SS Hp Ratings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2006, 11:39 PM
  #21  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings

Actually the center exit exhaust is the most restrictive one you could get. The SLP dual/dual was the best. THEY DON"T MAKE MORE POWER, how many times do I have to say this???? If you think I don't know what i am talking about go ask this question on LS1tech.com
ORIGINAL: blueherd02gt

Yea because the m6's driver needs to push all those damn buttons[:@] My father in law has one and it requires some intelligence to drive[&:]
What buttons? My car was an M6 and there are no buttons to push.....a stalled auto will simply get out of the hole a ton quicker than an M6.
JD1969 is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:43 PM
  #22  
SpecterGT260
5th Gear Member
 
SpecterGT260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,003
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings


ORIGINAL: Crazyfast50stang

ss was 325 and z28 was 315
[sm=icon_beat.gif]

all ls1 fbodies were right around 340. z28=ss=TA=ws6=c5 as far as power train goes.
SpecterGT260 is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:57 PM
  #23  
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 15,864
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings


ORIGINAL: steedondubs

Is it a waste of time to buy an Auto SS instead of an M6
no, other way around if anything


ORIGINAL: steedondubs

what do most 01-02 SSs make at the wheels from the factory
they were rated at the wheels, even though GM said differently
mustangman02232 is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:58 PM
  #24  
SpecterGT260
5th Gear Member
 
SpecterGT260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,003
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings

from what ive heard they will dyno on average 290 at the wheels. some will hit the 300 mark too.
SpecterGT260 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 12:03 AM
  #25  
97 5.0L
3rd Gear Member
 
97 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings


ORIGINAL: JD1969

HP ratings on the LS1 were/are marketing BS. The SS makes no more power than a Z/28, the engines are exactly the same, some will argue that the ram air hood makes some power, but timeslips and dynos have proven this not to be true. 01/02 LS1's will put down 300+ rwhp on average. On the subject of auto vs M6, a stalled auto will flat out butt rape an M6 car. BTW there is a sticky in the Street/Strip section about LS1's.
I have to disagree. I had a 98 Z28 and a 99 SS and the SS felt alot faster but was only 1/10th faster on the 1/8 mile
97 5.0L is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 12:12 AM
  #26  
2green4red
2nd Gear Member
 
2green4red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 154
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings

He asked about the horsepower, I simply answered, and yes, with the "advertised" number. Goes to my point though, if marketing selected it they did a **** poor job since the (generally) the engine (in EITHER body. and we shouldn't forget the ws6 sisters as well in that case) performs "better than advertised".

To the starter, there were diff options within the SS depending on year as well, so even my answer wasn't that comprehensive. LS1tech (as mentioned already) along with many similar sites, you can even check out ones on the WS6, same engine, different wrapper, will have all sorts of people breaking down the years, options, dyno sheets, etc.


P.S.- I believe the SS/WS6 was heavier than the Z, a factor for the track nuts....

2green4red is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 01:06 AM
  #27  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings

ORIGINAL: 97 5.0L


ORIGINAL: JD1969

HP ratings on the LS1 were/are marketing BS. The SS makes no more power than a Z/28, the engines are exactly the same, some will argue that the ram air hood makes some power, but timeslips and dynos have proven this not to be true. 01/02 LS1's will put down 300+ rwhp on average. On the subject of auto vs M6, a stalled auto will flat out butt rape an M6 car. BTW there is a sticky in the Street/Strip section about LS1's.
I have to disagree. I had a 98 Z28 and a 99 SS and the SS felt alot faster but was only 1/10th faster on the 1/8 mile
So your going with seat of the pants feel and what it did on one day at the track. 1/10th of a second can be attributed to weather, launch, better shifting, a tail wind....Like I said if anyone here doubts my info, go to LS1tech and have a look around. If thats not enough then I don't know what to say. BTW people, I work on these engines everyday (we put many LS1's into different cars at my work) so I might just have a slight clue. Click the link in my sig if you want to see what I/we do.
JD1969 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 01:12 AM
  #28  
snakeman4life
4th Gear Member
 
snakeman4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,209
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings


ORIGINAL: JD1969

ORIGINAL: 97 5.0L


ORIGINAL: JD1969

HP ratings on the LS1 were/are marketing BS. The SS makes no more power than a Z/28, the engines are exactly the same, some will argue that the ram air hood makes some power, but timeslips and dynos have proven this not to be true. 01/02 LS1's will put down 300+ rwhp on average. On the subject of auto vs M6, a stalled auto will flat out butt rape an M6 car. BTW there is a sticky in the Street/Strip section about LS1's.
I have to disagree. I had a 98 Z28 and a 99 SS and the SS felt alot faster but was only 1/10th faster on the 1/8 mile
So your going with seat of the pants feel and what it did on one day at the track. 1/10th of a second can be attributed to weather, launch, better shifting, a tail wind....Like I said if anyone here doubts my info, go to LS1tech and have a look around. If thats not enough then I don't know what to say. BTW people, I work on these engines everyday (we put many LS1's into different cars at my work) so I might just have a slight clue. Click the link in my sig if you want to see what I/we do.
Dude what are you talking about? The SS has to be faster since it cost $8k more[8D]
snakeman4life is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 01:13 AM
  #29  
SpecterGT260
5th Gear Member
 
SpecterGT260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,003
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings


ORIGINAL: JD1969

ORIGINAL: 97 5.0L


ORIGINAL: JD1969

HP ratings on the LS1 were/are marketing BS. The SS makes no more power than a Z/28, the engines are exactly the same, some will argue that the ram air hood makes some power, but timeslips and dynos have proven this not to be true. 01/02 LS1's will put down 300+ rwhp on average. On the subject of auto vs M6, a stalled auto will flat out butt rape an M6 car. BTW there is a sticky in the Street/Strip section about LS1's.
I have to disagree. I had a 98 Z28 and a 99 SS and the SS felt alot faster but was only 1/10th faster on the 1/8 mile
So your going with seat of the pants feel and what it did on one day at the track. 1/10th of a second can be attributed to weather, launch, better shifting, a tail wind....Like I said if anyone here doubts my info, go to LS1tech and have a look around. If thats not enough then I don't know what to say. BTW people, I work on these engines everyday (we put many LS1's into different cars at my work) so I might just have a slight clue. Click the link in my sig if you want to see what I/we do.

no.... dont do that..... just listen to him, because ive already fought and lost the ls1 battle here [>:] hes right about em.
SpecterGT260 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 01:15 AM
  #30  
stanger88
I ♥ Acer
 
stanger88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,541
Default RE: Camaro SS Hp Ratings

LS1 is an LS1 is an LS1 PERIOD.
stanger88 is offline  


Quick Reply: Camaro SS Hp Ratings



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.