Premium fuel
#11
RE: Premium fuel
ORIGINAL: akelemecz
I'm tired of you cut and paste guys .. if thats the case.. 105 octane fuel is just there to be a huge gimmick! ... 93 is a cleaner fuel with more additives etc... allowing your fuel system to run cleaner... and for $.10 more a gallon .. 1.50 a week .. and 78 dollars a year its worth it ....
I'm tired of you cut and paste guys .. if thats the case.. 105 octane fuel is just there to be a huge gimmick! ... 93 is a cleaner fuel with more additives etc... allowing your fuel system to run cleaner... and for $.10 more a gallon .. 1.50 a week .. and 78 dollars a year its worth it ....
#12
RE: Premium fuel
Haha .. ok sorry .. I'm a noob that knows nothing about cars .. *********** Be nice or be banned. One warning....
_____________________________
Basically you're telling me that if I'd take my GT ... and run it with my 100 wet shot running 87.. and then take it ... get it tuned with 105 .. then take it back and run it .. it wouldn't do me a damn bit of good ?
_____________________________
Basically you're telling me that if I'd take my GT ... and run it with my 100 wet shot running 87.. and then take it ... get it tuned with 105 .. then take it back and run it .. it wouldn't do me a damn bit of good ?
#15
#16
RE: Premium fuel
#17
RE: Premium fuel
ORIGINAL: 1fast50
Why do the cobras require Premium fuel? whats so special about the engines?
Why do the cobras require Premium fuel? whats so special about the engines?
ORIGINAL: oxfordgt
I hope you like wasting money cause thats what you are doing. 93 is no better then 89. 93 has a higher temp at which it ignites. When you advance your timing you allow more air in the combustion chamber which makes it hotter when you compress it. The cobra's have higher compression ratios (NA) then GT's which causes more heat and that is why you need to run 93 octane. Running 93 in a stock GT is just a waste of money and does ablosutly noting for your car.
I hope you like wasting money cause thats what you are doing. 93 is no better then 89. 93 has a higher temp at which it ignites. When you advance your timing you allow more air in the combustion chamber which makes it hotter when you compress it. The cobra's have higher compression ratios (NA) then GT's which causes more heat and that is why you need to run 93 octane. Running 93 in a stock GT is just a waste of money and does ablosutly noting for your car.
ORIGINAL: akelemecz
I'm tired of you cut and paste guys .. if thats the case.. 105 octane fuel is just there to be a huge gimmick! ... 93 is a cleaner fuel with more additives etc... allowing your fuel system to run cleaner... and for $.10 more a gallon .. 1.50 a week .. and 78 dollars a year its worth it ....
I'm tired of you cut and paste guys .. if thats the case.. 105 octane fuel is just there to be a huge gimmick! ... 93 is a cleaner fuel with more additives etc... allowing your fuel system to run cleaner... and for $.10 more a gallon .. 1.50 a week .. and 78 dollars a year its worth it ....
ORIGINAL: akelemecz
Haha .. ok sorry .. I'm a noob that knows nothing about cars .. STFU you dumb**** ...
Basically you're telling me that if I'd take my GT ... and run it with my 100 wet shot running 87.. and then take it ... get it tuned with 105 .. then take it back and run it .. it wouldn't do me a damn bit of good ?
Haha .. ok sorry .. I'm a noob that knows nothing about cars .. STFU you dumb**** ...
Basically you're telling me that if I'd take my GT ... and run it with my 100 wet shot running 87.. and then take it ... get it tuned with 105 .. then take it back and run it .. it wouldn't do me a damn bit of good ?
So much incorrect information that just flat out doesn't make sense flying around this thread.
#18
RE: Premium fuel
akelemecz said that the 93 is a better fuel - of which he is correct - its cleaner and better for the longevity of a tuned motor for shure. However you are incorrect in some respects - 105 will make more power than 87 - sorry to tell you - but yes you do need a tune to take advantage of that potential gain...
but for your stock car 87 is just as good - now wether 93 is a total waste is another debate - bc your car will run better with 93, but is it NECESSARY ..no is it a waste I dont think so - the 93 does have more detergents
I would jsut say run what ever you think is better - I run 93 but I have a tune - before the tune I ran 87
I would have to agree that running 93 full time is a waste on a stocker - but 93 every once in a while wont hurt it... however if youve been running 93 - I would say stick with it - bc I hear horror stories of the down grade if you have been running it a long time.
but for your stock car 87 is just as good - now wether 93 is a total waste is another debate - bc your car will run better with 93, but is it NECESSARY ..no is it a waste I dont think so - the 93 does have more detergents
I would jsut say run what ever you think is better - I run 93 but I have a tune - before the tune I ran 87
I would have to agree that running 93 full time is a waste on a stocker - but 93 every once in a while wont hurt it... however if youve been running 93 - I would say stick with it - bc I hear horror stories of the down grade if you have been running it a long time.