auto vs manual
#11
RE: auto vs manual
a ls1 is rated at 310, it puts down just under that, [8D]
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
#13
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: mustangman02232
a ls1 is rated at 310, it puts down just under that, [8D]
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
a ls1 is rated at 310, it puts down just under that, [8D]
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
#14
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: akelemecz
Yeah ... a rebuilt 4l60e wtih a shift kit and performance tourque converter really made my silverado a nasty nitrous truck ... its a ****ty tranny stock .. but with mods its pretty sick ...
Yeah ... a rebuilt 4l60e wtih a shift kit and performance tourque converter really made my silverado a nasty nitrous truck ... its a ****ty tranny stock .. but with mods its pretty sick ...
#15
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: GreyStangDamn dude, "auto vs manual" topic gets beaten to death here.. do a search!And umm,, manual is just plain better,, get over it
#16
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: droptoppony
A 4R70W with a shift kit and TC will rape a 5sp GT and they are pretty strong tranny's compared to the 5speeds.
ORIGINAL: mustangman02232
a ls1 is rated at 310, it puts down just under that, [8D]
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
a ls1 is rated at 310, it puts down just under that, [8D]
auto or stick doesnt really make a difference, unlike the pos 4R70W in the stangs, they are running a 4L60-E in the fbodys, which wiht a stall and shift kit, will flat out rape a 6 speed
#17
RE: auto vs manual
i was just having the LS1 talk on a different forum and some poeple say they were underrated and realy have about 350 hp to the crank, the guy says his LS1 with very high mileage put out 288 to the wheels. but auto n manual, its purely a personal thing. i have an auto and still really like it, it also helped me fairly well since it was my first car, i didn't have to concentrate on shifting, i just could keep my eyes on the road. manuals can be more fun in some situations though but for everyday driving i'd rather have an auto, keeps me a free hand to do whatever. and for the 8% power loss, that could easily be made up with other upgrades anyway.
#18
RE: auto vs manual
in about 5-10 years i think that the whole auto vs. manual debate will be pointless because of cvt's. not sure if they'll put cvt's in sports cars but they'll probably put them in other vehicles for sure. some saturns and other brands already have them.
#19
RE: auto vs manual
In 5-10 more years we won't NEED cvt transmissions, because a lot of cars will be powered by superconductive electric motors that are fed by a revolutionary breakthrough in battery technology
Untill that day happens give me a standard tranny FTW [8D] Sure you can "optimize" an auto tranny & it's torque converter, but they will still rob engine power in their operation. But autos are good in a couple of areas.. in bracket racing they can be more consistent, and in state-of-the-art top fuel funny cars they haul ***. Also I guess if you suffer from a sore knee they can help avoid working a clutch lol
Untill that day happens give me a standard tranny FTW [8D] Sure you can "optimize" an auto tranny & it's torque converter, but they will still rob engine power in their operation. But autos are good in a couple of areas.. in bracket racing they can be more consistent, and in state-of-the-art top fuel funny cars they haul ***. Also I guess if you suffer from a sore knee they can help avoid working a clutch lol
#20
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: GreyStang
In 5-10 more years we won't NEED cvt transmissions, because a lot of cars will be powered by superconductive electric motors that are fed by a revolutionary breakthrough in battery technology
Untill that day happens give me a standard tranny FTW [8D] Sure you can "optimize" an auto tranny & it's torque converter, but they will still rob engine power in their operation. But autos are good in a couple of areas.. in bracket racing they can be more consistent, and in state-of-the-art top fuel funny cars they haul ***. Also I guess if you suffer from a sore knee they can help avoid working a clutch lol
In 5-10 more years we won't NEED cvt transmissions, because a lot of cars will be powered by superconductive electric motors that are fed by a revolutionary breakthrough in battery technology
Untill that day happens give me a standard tranny FTW [8D] Sure you can "optimize" an auto tranny & it's torque converter, but they will still rob engine power in their operation. But autos are good in a couple of areas.. in bracket racing they can be more consistent, and in state-of-the-art top fuel funny cars they haul ***. Also I guess if you suffer from a sore knee they can help avoid working a clutch lol