auto vs manual
#2
RE: auto vs manual
Umm for the first part, yes typically a manual will dyno higher stock than an automatic since the manual experiences less parasitic loss through the drivetrain. As for what the Z28 would dyno at, I have no clue.
#6
RE: auto vs manual
manual=less resistance Clutch=straight drive train(clutch pretty much=reversd brakes), Torque converter=pretty much a fan trying to push another fan through oil. and not only does the toque converter drain power, but milage too, not much, but manuals typcally get 1-2 miles per gallon better than autos.
#7
RE: auto vs manual
ORIGINAL: yellowgtstang18
oh i know my stuff, my friend did not believe me and he dont believe a stock 2001 z28 dyno around 300rwhp, thats why i am asking that to
oh i know my stuff, my friend did not believe me and he dont believe a stock 2001 z28 dyno around 300rwhp, thats why i am asking that to
#9
RE: auto vs manual
ls1 fbodys dyno 300+ rw, and when it comes to fbodys im pretty sure they dont have the problem with the hp loss through a auto like us stangers do. idk if im right but thats what ive heard from my fbody friend.
autos are better for the track lets not forget.
autos are better for the track lets not forget.
#10
RE: auto vs manual
I was on a camaro site, and they said that they put down less % horsepower then we do, in other words that they do lose more hp through the drivetrain then we do percentage wise, however their suspension setup is also superior to ours for draggin.