4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Advanced IAC question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2009, 09:54 AM
  #1  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default Advanced IAC question

Has anyone ever converted their IAC from the independent air source model to one that doesn't require the fresh air tube that looks like crap across the engine bay?? I know that the explorers use an IAC that doesn't use external air, could that be modified on the plenum? The tube is a sore thumb in my bay.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 02:41 PM
  #2  
sstang
5th Gear Member
 
sstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,663
Default

Wow that definitely is a sore thumb for you, it looks out of place. I'm also interested in this.

BUMP
sstang is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 07:51 PM
  #3  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Anyone?
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 08:01 PM
  #4  
dvs_03gt
4th Gear Member
 
dvs_03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,464
Default

i have a friend who had some custom type iac piping, that looked clean, ill ask for screenshots and info..

check into that though would look better then current IMO.
dvs_03gt is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 08:15 PM
  #5  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

The IAC bypasses air that has been metered by the MAF, around the throttle body. The PCM controls the amount of air being bypassed to control the idle.

On some engines there's a port upstream of the throttle plate, and another downstream, built in to the TB. The TB in our cars is not designed in that manner however perhaps one so designed could be fitted.

In your setup it looks as though steps were taken to prevent boost from acting upon the IAC. This is likely a wise move as neither the IAC plumbing nor the valve itself were designed to deal with pressurized input air--the opposite actually, on a n/a setup the IAC only "sees" vacuum.

On my JRSC'd '90 Miata there was a similar hose--leading from just after the AFM and before the blower, around to the IAC (under a dummy TB)-- in which a low force check valve was placed to block a back flow of boost. You can see the 3/4" hose sweeping across the front, the check valve is the silver thingy near the radiator cap.



Other than trying to make it look as good as possible I don't know what to tell you--maybe get rid of the Helmholtz resonator (it's just noise suppression thing) and see if you can find a molded hose with a 90° bend, and couple it to a longer hose that can be routed more discretely.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 10:49 PM
  #6  
cbbass123
1st Gear Member
 
cbbass123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Has anyone ever converted their IAC from the independent air source model to one that doesn't require the fresh air tube that looks like crap across the engine bay?? I know that the explorers use an IAC that doesn't use external air, could that be modified on the plenum? The tube is a sore thumb in my bay.
tell the truth...you just like posting pics of your motor.

But yes...it does stick out...Maybe you could fabricate some nice chrome/alum piping for the long distances...similar to the replacement chrome radiator upper hose.
cbbass123 is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 09:13 AM
  #7  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by cbbass123
tell the truth...you just like posting pics of your motor.

But yes...it does stick out...Maybe you could fabricate some nice chrome/alum piping for the long distances...similar to the replacement chrome radiator upper hose.

Good suggestion, very often if something cannot be succesfully hidden highlighting it is the best alternative.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 09:15 AM
  #8  
Chris98Gt
3rd Gear Member
 
Chris98Gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 931
Default

http://sn95forums.com/index.php/topic,37375.0.html
Only one I've seen do this. I haven't tried it yet, but I'd like to.
Chris98Gt is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 07:02 PM
  #9  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Originally Posted by Chris98Gt
http://sn95forums.com/index.php/topic,37375.0.html
Only one I've seen do this. I haven't tried it yet, but I'd like to.
I've seen that thread before although I couldn't remmeber where, thanks.


Cliff, what do you think about that ^?

Originally Posted by cliffyk
The IAC bypasses air that has been metered by the MAF, around the throttle body. The PCM controls the amount of air being bypassed to control the idle.

On some engines there's a port upstream of the throttle plate, and another downstream, built in to the TB. The TB in our cars is not designed in that manner however perhaps one so designed could be fitted.

In your setup it looks as though steps were taken to prevent boost from acting upon the IAC. This is likely a wise move as neither the IAC plumbing nor the valve itself were designed to deal with pressurized input air--the opposite actually, on a n/a setup the IAC only "sees" vacuum.

Other than trying to make it look as good as possible I don't know what to tell you--maybe get rid of the Helmholtz resonator (it's just noise suppression thing) and see if you can find a molded hose with a 90° bend, and couple it to a longer hose that can be routed more discretely.
Although I know of dozens of people running the IAC from the pressurized inlet after the S/C before the TB I have always been skeptical of it not affecting the system. I guess, their logic is that at idle is when the IAC is active it doesn't affect it during boost when the IAC isn't active.

Last edited by Sxynerd; 07-12-2009 at 07:12 PM.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 07-13-2009, 05:33 PM
  #10  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
I've seen that thread before although I couldn't remmeber where, thanks.


Cliff, what do you think about that ^?
I didn't read it in detail because of the reverse set type, however the thread seemed like a bunch of people who didn't know much tossing in there $0.02 worth...

The IAC has to have metered air as it's input, that is air in addition to the air bleed around the throttle plate. I have seen many plenums and TB's that accomplish this by having passage ways that feed air around the throttle plate--if you look at the IAC on our cars you can see that the casting is set up to allow for "in" and "out" ports.

The IAC air needs to be metered so that the PCM can see the air passed by the IAC and add fuel as needed--otherwise all that would happen would be a leaner mix.


Although I know of dozens of people running the IAC from the pressurized inlet after the S/C before the TB I have always been skeptical of it not affecting the system. I guess, their logic is that at idle is when the IAC is active it doesn't affect it during boost when the IAC isn't active.
The IAC is likely capable of handling the boost pressure, and is likely closed when boost is present. On the Miata the check value was a tweak that Jackson Racing added when they acquired the old Sebring s/c kit. It significantly improved idle control.
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: Advanced IAC question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.