#'s are in! Dyno: 01 Mustang Gt Procharger D1SC
01-16-2012, 06:13 PM
#11
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 122
Corrected numbers are the ones that should be used for an honest relative comparison. Uncorrected are likely to be higher than corrected numbers, especially in the north during the winter.
The numbers are very good either way, but corrected numbers are really needed to better assess the power output.
The numbers are very good either way, but corrected numbers are really needed to better assess the power output.
ahhhh my bad! i have no idea.. i hope they r corrected #s i guess.. ill ask the tuner what they are...
01-16-2012, 06:30 PM
#12
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Correction adjusts the numbers to a standard so that they are of better relative value. A car dyno'd in the wet heat of Alabama in the summer will then make much better power if dyno'd in dry cool air of IL in winter. Correction will adjust both numbers so they are an apples to apples comparison.
You will still LOVE the numbers, but they would likely drop if they were not corrected before.
01-16-2012, 07:41 PM
#13
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 122
Ask him to give you both the uncorrected (what it actually made at that time) and the corrected numbers.
Correction adjusts the numbers to a standard so that they are of better relative value. A car dyno'd in the wet heat of Alabama in the summer will then make much better power if dyno'd in dry cool air of IL in winter. Correction will adjust both numbers so they are an apples to apples comparison.
You will still LOVE the numbers, but they would likely drop if they were not corrected before.
Correction adjusts the numbers to a standard so that they are of better relative value. A car dyno'd in the wet heat of Alabama in the summer will then make much better power if dyno'd in dry cool air of IL in winter. Correction will adjust both numbers so they are an apples to apples comparison.
You will still LOVE the numbers, but they would likely drop if they were not corrected before.
01-17-2012, 11:10 PM
#19
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 122
thanks dw! car looks good too! what lt and cams u running..thats my next project i think...but gonna be prob around summer time..
01-18-2012, 07:02 AM
#20
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 2,758
Cams are CMS stage 1 N/A cams. I know N/A cams haha. I put the cams in with the plans to run nitrous but you see how that went. My plans are blower cams in the future but as of now my cams are doing really well for N/A cams in a blower applications. And as for the LT's they are pypes and lemme tell you STAY AWAY do not go pypes they fit but you gotta do a lot to make em fit. If i had to do em again (which i can see me having to do because of the crappy quality) I am going to go with mac LT's, They make good stuff at reasonable prices. Only reason i went pypes is because i got the LT's and midpipe for $200 shipped which i thought was too good to pass up.