Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.
Sponsored by Cruizin Concepts


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2012, 07:49 PM   #21
GrimReaper_03vert
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Vehicle: 03 GT
Location: CT
Posts: 6
tkethslfe
Default

Great thread for this mustang n00b, thank you!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
GrimReaper_03vert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 12:04 AM   #22
Nomad8888
1st Gear Member
 
Nomad8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 2001 Mustang GT
Location: California
Posts: 68
Default

Hey folks! I'm brand new here and I'm curious what "flsfc" means. I just bought a Mustang yesterday and I'm really into it already.
__________________
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
- Voltaire


2001 Mustang GT
Steering Wheel
Exhaust Pipes
Carpet
Round thing on dash
Nomad8888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 12:39 PM   #23
MCxQubed
5th Gear Member
 
MCxQubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT and 1967 Mustang Fastback
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,171
Mase V2SQ
Default

flsfc means full length subframe connectors. sorry should have specified that
__________________


2004 Mustang GT
Vortech V2 SQ-Trim
3.33 Pulley
CX Racing Intercooler
Anderson Powerpipe
SLP Catted X
SLP Power-Flo Catback
Eibach Pro-Kit
Steeda Tri-Ax
SCT X3
FRPP 4:10's
Mac 70mm Throttle Body
Tuned by Big Daddy Performance

389 rwhp and 378 rwtq
MCxQubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:18 AM   #24
2008saleen
 
2008saleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Vehicle: 2008 Ford Mustang Saleen s281
Location: Florida
Posts: 46
Default

Very nicely done.
__________________
There is nothing so simple that it can not be done wrong
2008saleen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:07 PM   #25
kurtis_garcia
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Vehicle: 2000,ford,gt
Location: tx
Posts: 37
Default

Great post great post...I haven't been on the forum long but have already been helped out alot......The underdrive pullies don't actually gain you any hp at all like you were explaining but does clear out hp from other parts in your car...you can expect to gain anywere from 8-15 hp from putting them on......The question about the x and h pipe not sure if anyone has answered already but there isn't a difference in gain they are basically the same thing just one has pretty much a higher pitch of tone then the other but the other has a better rumble....I got a h-pipe on mine and it rumbles really good....

I got a 2000 gt with k&n kai,75mm throttle body and upper plenum,bbk underdrive pullies,bbk shorty headers, borla drop tip exhaust,pro cam hurst shifter, ford racing clutch, ford racing 4:10 gears, and now just ordered the bama tuner
kurtis_garcia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:48 PM   #26
STRIDER115

 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Vehicle: 1997 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1
Default

I've got a 97 GT with many of the mods described here and have to say that of all of them the one I could live without is the CAI (which was on the car when I bought it).

Specifics:

no-namey CAI
BBK pulleys
BBK H-PIPE
Flowmaster 40s
B&M Ratchet Shifter
Trick Flow 70mm TB & Plenum
SCT Tuner
Ford Racing 3.73 gears
PowerStop brakes

Of all the mods, the most smile and tire smoke-inducing are by far the SCT tuner and the 3.73 gears. The exhaust sounds great, with a lot of rumble, but in terms of sheer improvement nothing beat the first drive after the TB/Plenum and 3.73 upgrade.

One recommendation I can make is to spend a little money to make the car STOP as good as it goes. I have the drilled/slotted rotor and ceramic pad setup from PowerStop and have been very happy. It's a major improvement over the weak stock brakes and looks worlds better as well. Spend the extra $20 and couple of hours cleaning and painting your calipers while you're in there. It's a subtle and easy task that say "someone cares about this car".
STRIDER115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 02:04 PM   #27
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 98 GT Blumurder
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,238
Default

Moved to tech
__________________


540 rwhp 477 tq
Vortech SQ to T-trim upgrade
MHS Stage 2 heads/cams
Tuned by Matt at Performance Evolution
11.055@129 MPH 1.75 60'
lizzyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 05:49 PM   #28
hue001t
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Vehicle: 1995 Ford Mustang
Location: North carolina
Posts: 29
Default

taged
hue001t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 06:06 PM   #29
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT

 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 1998 SL500
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,906
Default

A member on another forum asked me "What are your thoughts about performance plugs, wires, and coils? These are usually relatively cheap and obviously bolt-on. Advertisements always emphasize the gains achieved with these items."

Rather then type all this again should it come up here I thought I'd add it to this thread.

============================================

Simple answer, they are lying to you.

Spark Plugs:

Regarding spark plugs let us first examine what motivation Ford would have to choose to install plain ol' single electrode platinum plugs, rather than some other fancy magical multi-electrode, mystical "power" plug.

Answer: They have none.

Auto makers compete vigorously to attain the highest horsepower and fuel economy ratings, and have to pay a fine to the EPA for every vehicle produced that does not meet the CAFE requirements. If spending another $50 on spark plugs could provide such miraculous increases in HP and mpg it would be pretty stupid of them to not do it, wouldn't it?

Also consider that Champion has been making spark plugs for over 110 years, and with the exception of a small line of multi-electrode designs for specialty applications does not make such plugs for general automotive use. If there were a better way to make a spark plug Champion would have sorted it out by now, or bought up the technology.

For nearly any but the most radical naturally aspirated build, and any modest boost (< 8 psi) setup, fine wire precious metal electrode plugs are the best selection. Fine wire plugs require 40% less voltage to ionise the gap and fire and are much less prone to fouling--that is why automakers choose them. I run Champion stk# 3401 plugs in my '03 GT which turned out 262/305 rwHP/lb-ft with only modest bolts-ons and a highlt optimised tune.

Plug Wires, Coils and Coil Packs:

A long long time ago, in a Galaxy far away (a 1964 Ford Galaxy) stock ignition coils sucked big time when combined with most any sort of engine performance upgrade; as did the distributor, condenser and wires-- and an entire industry was built arouned this by companies like Accel, Mallory, MSD and others to fill the gap (no pun intended).

Back then the grandiose claims made by aftermarket ignition component makers/vendors were actually and largely true. But then along came emissions standards and the automakers could no longer deliver vehicles with such poor ignition systems and meet the standards. For a while the aftermarket stuff was often still superior, however as time went by and OEM distributorless wasted spark, and COP ignition systems, became commonplace the aftermarket claims became increasingly just that--claims based on something that was once true ( BTW, K&N lives on riding this same train).

Assuming that wire set/coil combination A can fire the plugs so as to initiate a solid combustion and flame-front, there is no reason to expect that wire set/coil combination B could cause engine output to increase. Beyond that distributorless technology (coil packs and long plug wires) for over the road vehicles are a far less than state-of-the-art systems. If I were doing a serious street build on a '96 to '98 Mustang with the EDIS system I would look into a COP conversion.

COPs:

Now there is something serious to discuss.

The stock COPs are universally held as being superior to aftermarket units, and my own testing of COPs donated to my project supports that position. I found no aftermarket COP that surpassed the stock units in either energy output or durability, in fact a number of the aftermarket COPs were less durable:

Click the image to open in full size.

The COP Tester shown is my own creation and uses a manually triggered MOSFET ignition driver firing circuit very similar to that in the PCM. The COP's output is connected to an adjustable air gap tester, and its output gauged by how large an air gap it can fire across:

Here is an Accel COP set up for testing:

Click the image to open in full size.

Here are the results of testing four Accel COPs against four stock coils:

Click the image to open in full size.

Note that the Ford OEM COPs consistently produced 55 kV, 5 kV more than the Accel COPs.

Here is a video of an Accel COP being tested, firing across a 15 mm (0.590") air gap.

If the rapid sequential full charge dump firing shown in the video were performed 10 to 12 times the COP will become so hot you could not hold it in your hand; if full charge dump is fired 20 times rapidly smoke will start to come from the COP and it will have been significantly compromised. 25+ such firings will burn the COP out completely. At some number of such firing this is true for any COP, from any maker. I did find that in general the stock COPs were more resistant to this treatment, some requiring as many as 30 rapid cycle firings to burn them out.

This is a real torture test as the COPs are not engineered or intended to ever do this. In normal use, making a spark across a piddly little 1.4 mm (0.054"), less than 5% of the COPs full charge is dissipated. Here's are oscilloscope traces of an Accel COP firing across a 0.054" and 15 mm gaps:

Click the image to open in full size.

Note: I more aggressively and destructively tested the Accel COPs because a contributor sent me a set of eight (with three already burned out) and I have my own set of eight in which four had burned out over a five week period, with between 20k and 25k miles on them.

COPs have tremendous reserve capacity, so much that it is used at idle and up to 1200 rpm or so to fire each plug 3 times in rapid succession to provide a smoother burn and improve emissions. Here is what this looks like on an oscilloscope:

Click the image to open in full size.

The high initial spike represents the coil's stored energy ionising the spark plug gap, this is a voltage spike of 16 to 20 kV (off the top of the trace). The short downward sloping line after the ionisation event is the plug actually firing at a sustained voltage of 4 to 6 kV. The triple firings are clearly seen at 1.33 ms intervals.

The torture test also reveals why COPs tend to fail soon after washing an engine or a coolant leak has flooded the plug wells. The COPs will be have been compromised by being subjected to near and full capacity discharges. Grossly worn plugs with large gaps, and boots that are arcing through can also weaken COPs; I recommend changing the COP boots at 100k miles.


So there you have it--see what happens when you ask a retired engineer a simple question?
__________________
-cliff knight-
SOLD! - 2003 GT, UPR X, FRPP 24lb/h, Magnaflow, PP 70mm TB & plenum,
Delta Force tuned, Steeda UDPs, Ralco flywheel,
RAM HDX clutch, 3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 lb-ft.

New ride (7/1/2013) 1998 Mercedes SL500-5.0L 32V VVT 326/347 HP/tq


Engineering is, at its base, making what you want from what you have.
At its extreme it is making what you want from what you can get.

Last edited by cliffyk; 02-02-2013 at 10:34 AM.
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 10:15 AM   #30
MCxQubed
5th Gear Member
 
MCxQubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT and 1967 Mustang Fastback
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,171
Mase V2SQ
Default

That is an amazing write up Cliffy!! I went and put it in the original post so that it is with the rest of the information!
__________________


2004 Mustang GT
Vortech V2 SQ-Trim
3.33 Pulley
CX Racing Intercooler
Anderson Powerpipe
SLP Catted X
SLP Power-Flo Catback
Eibach Pro-Kit
Steeda Tri-Ax
SCT X3
FRPP 4:10's
Mac 70mm Throttle Body
Tuned by Big Daddy Performance

389 rwhp and 378 rwtq
MCxQubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 10:15 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup