4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Older Mustang Reliability issues?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2013, 11:33 AM
  #11  
Doyon
3rd Gear Member
 
Doyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Alaska
Posts: 681
Default

These are reliable IMO, except for the few lemons and those who don't take care of their vehicle then pass it to someone else who deals with the problems, which is the reason I had to cut my loss after paying over 7k in repairs, after buying one.

35k- 80k miles is pretty low, hopefully low enough that someone hasn't abused them yet.

I think the only common problem that pops up here the most was the IACV (I think that's what it's called). But many of the Stangs that I see that have problems are 100k+ miles and were probably abused at some point in life.

IMO, get the lowest mileage Mustang you can get, take good care of her and she should take good care of you.
Doyon is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 12:02 PM
  #12  
ZeroTX
2nd Gear Member
 
ZeroTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 216
Default

Check the intake manifold, sometimes they crack (mosty due to age more so than mileage, so don't assume low miles = not an issue there).

Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore

You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
ZeroTX is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 12:21 PM
  #13  
thegreyman
Thread Starter
 
thegreyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by fastbackford351
My 02 GT convertible has been as reliable as an anvil. I bought it at 36k and it now has just over 100k on the clock. I replaced the top myself with the help of a step by step DVD I bought off of Ebay and do the maintenance myself.

My advice would be to buy one as close to stock as possible and avoid the heavily modded cars. Maybe it's just me but for future reliabilities sake I prefer stock to modded when I'm buying a used car.
Brother, I agree. I only purchase used vehicles that are MECHANICALLY unmolested. Best way to go. Then when I own them, I usually put rims and some minimal exterior tasteful mods. For the engine the most I ever do is exhaust, and air filter/intake. In the case of the mustang, I will break my own rule and def put in a short throw shifter
thegreyman is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 12:24 PM
  #14  
thegreyman
Thread Starter
 
thegreyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTX
Check the intake manifold, sometimes they crack (mosty due to age more so than mileage, so don't assume low miles = not an issue there).

Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore

You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
Great advice. I am knit picky and all about preventive maintenance. I will mostly like just purchase a new door trims and all the lil cosmetic things that are worn, I will mostly likely just spend some $ and purchase some new parts from american muscle. I like my vehicles to be in tip top shape
thegreyman is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 01:14 PM
  #15  
Seabee1993
2nd Gear Member
 
Seabee1993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: MS
Posts: 467
Default

Rock Auto has way better deals for OEM parts. I bought new rotors/ pads (Raybestos) for 285.00 shipped. So gotta look at your options out there.
Seabee1993 is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 10:06 PM
  #16  
ZeroTX
2nd Gear Member
 
ZeroTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 216
Default

I'm cheap, I went with eBay rotors and pads for a lot less. I'll let you know how it works out.

Parts for these cars, generally, are the cheapest, with the possible exception of 87-93 5.0L Mustangs.
ZeroTX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
09-20-2022 01:04 AM
cyclop5
4.0L V6 Technical Discussions
3
10-03-2015 09:21 PM
mweiland
General Tech
6
08-13-2015 05:11 PM
'stangdude
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
5
08-12-2015 01:27 PM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: Older Mustang Reliability issues?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.