Older Mustang Reliability issues?
#11
These are reliable IMO, except for the few lemons and those who don't take care of their vehicle then pass it to someone else who deals with the problems, which is the reason I had to cut my loss after paying over 7k in repairs, after buying one.
35k- 80k miles is pretty low, hopefully low enough that someone hasn't abused them yet.
I think the only common problem that pops up here the most was the IACV (I think that's what it's called). But many of the Stangs that I see that have problems are 100k+ miles and were probably abused at some point in life.
IMO, get the lowest mileage Mustang you can get, take good care of her and she should take good care of you.
35k- 80k miles is pretty low, hopefully low enough that someone hasn't abused them yet.
I think the only common problem that pops up here the most was the IACV (I think that's what it's called). But many of the Stangs that I see that have problems are 100k+ miles and were probably abused at some point in life.
IMO, get the lowest mileage Mustang you can get, take good care of her and she should take good care of you.
#12
Check the intake manifold, sometimes they crack (mosty due to age more so than mileage, so don't assume low miles = not an issue there).
Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore
You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore
You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
#13
My 02 GT convertible has been as reliable as an anvil. I bought it at 36k and it now has just over 100k on the clock. I replaced the top myself with the help of a step by step DVD I bought off of Ebay and do the maintenance myself.
My advice would be to buy one as close to stock as possible and avoid the heavily modded cars. Maybe it's just me but for future reliabilities sake I prefer stock to modded when I'm buying a used car.
My advice would be to buy one as close to stock as possible and avoid the heavily modded cars. Maybe it's just me but for future reliabilities sake I prefer stock to modded when I'm buying a used car.
#14
Check the intake manifold, sometimes they crack (mosty due to age more so than mileage, so don't assume low miles = not an issue there).
Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore
You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
Also, I'd say that any New Edge (1999-2004) under 100k miles is "low miles." 100k isn't the end of the line for these cars. It's not 1978 anymore
You may find that there is some throw-backs to the 70's in body fitment. The New Edge Mustangs in particular look great, but if you are a super nit-picky person about gaps and alignments of panels/doors/trunk/bumpers, etc, you'll find fault in almost all of them, it seems. However, I like them better than the S197's (2005-Present), because they are compact, nimble, and less weight = requires less power to be fast. For this reason my stock 4.6L 260hp keeps up with a stock Challenger R/T 375hp, which is big and heavy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
'stangdude
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
5
08-12-2015 01:27 PM