Long tubes
#1
Long tubes
Has anybody installed these on a 4.6? 99-04. I know I have the ability but i understand lifting engine or dropping K is involved. if lifting engine how much? many things need also removing? rad hoses, wiring? and was it worth the effort? thanks
#2
I had them on my '96 GT. I don't remember many details because it was so long ago, but it was such a pain in the ***. I do remember having trouble with steering components and I used the lifting the motor method. I did not have to drop the K member.
As far as it being worth the trouble I have to ask "What is your goal?" If it's along the lines of getting every bit possible out of bolt-on horsepower, I'd say definitely go for it, but not before exploring other power adding options first such as nitrous or boost.
I don't have long tubes on my Mach 1 because I'm satisfied with what power it produces with the easy bolt-ons and a tune. The 2V engines however, need everything you can throw at them if you're keeping it naturally aspirated, in fact you'll have to get into the heads for that.
If you're looking for "easy" bolt-on gains it's not worth it. It's a pretty intense process, (compared to installing an h/x-pipe and cat-back) and you will definitely need a tune because LTs dramatically change the way exhaust leaves the motor.
As far as it being worth the trouble I have to ask "What is your goal?" If it's along the lines of getting every bit possible out of bolt-on horsepower, I'd say definitely go for it, but not before exploring other power adding options first such as nitrous or boost.
I don't have long tubes on my Mach 1 because I'm satisfied with what power it produces with the easy bolt-ons and a tune. The 2V engines however, need everything you can throw at them if you're keeping it naturally aspirated, in fact you'll have to get into the heads for that.
If you're looking for "easy" bolt-on gains it's not worth it. It's a pretty intense process, (compared to installing an h/x-pipe and cat-back) and you will definitely need a tune because LTs dramatically change the way exhaust leaves the motor.
#3
Thanks
I had them on my '96 GT. I don't remember many details because it was so long ago, but it was such a pain in the ***. I do remember having trouble with steering components and I used the lifting the motor method. I did not have to drop the K member.
As far as it being worth the trouble I have to ask "What is your goal?" If it's along the lines of getting every bit possible out of bolt-on horsepower, I'd say definitely go for it, but not before exploring other power adding options first such as nitrous or boost.
I don't have long tubes on my Mach 1 because I'm satisfied with what power it produces with the easy bolt-ons and a tune. The 2V engines however, need everything you can throw at them if you're keeping it naturally aspirated, in fact you'll have to get into the heads for that.
If you're looking for "easy" bolt-on gains it's not worth it. It's a pretty intense process, (compared to installing an h/x-pipe and cat-back) and you will definitely need a tune because LTs dramatically change the way exhaust leaves the motor.
As far as it being worth the trouble I have to ask "What is your goal?" If it's along the lines of getting every bit possible out of bolt-on horsepower, I'd say definitely go for it, but not before exploring other power adding options first such as nitrous or boost.
I don't have long tubes on my Mach 1 because I'm satisfied with what power it produces with the easy bolt-ons and a tune. The 2V engines however, need everything you can throw at them if you're keeping it naturally aspirated, in fact you'll have to get into the heads for that.
If you're looking for "easy" bolt-on gains it's not worth it. It's a pretty intense process, (compared to installing an h/x-pipe and cat-back) and you will definitely need a tune because LTs dramatically change the way exhaust leaves the motor.
#5
As for the tunes from AM/Bama, I can vouch that they are great for a car that is lightly modded. Once you get into upgrading the engine itself like heads, cams, and internals, you'd need a much more intensive tune.
The advantage of a tuner over a chip is that it's much easier to use. If you get the chip, you'll save a few bucks, but you have to pull out some of the plastics in the interior to get to your computer and then plug the chip into it. I don't know much about the process or loading the tunes from a chip so I'll just stop right there, but I do know that using a tuner is really easy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
daltron
5.0L GT S550 Tech
17
04-28-2016 08:10 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
2
10-05-2015 07:40 AM