4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

5.0 vs 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2004, 10:28 PM
  #11  
TheGmKiller331
I ♥ Acer
 
TheGmKiller331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,440
Default 5.0 vs 4.6

Its an older issue i think from 99.It was definately a FF&MM magazine that did the shootout.
TheGmKiller331 is offline  
Old 01-10-2004, 05:04 PM
  #12  
ajoyce76
 
ajoyce76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5
Default 5.0 vs 4.6

I'd like to put my two cents worth in. From a Physics perspective, a long stroke small bore combo would generate more torque and a short stroke large bore combo would gererate more horsepower. Let me explain, watch two people of different heights running. The short persons legs at a givenspeed will strike the ground more frequently than the tall person yet the tall person can stay abreast of the short person why? Because the tall person is generating more force(torque) with each strike. Torque is expressed as force times a torque arm(Rod). Make the arm longer and you generate more torque, even with a given amount of force. Now horsepower is a little different. Horsepower doesn't really exist, it is force/time. Therefore it is a ratio, not a principle unit. And since it is divided by time, by cutting time we can really increase power. Ashorter rod has a shorter period(amount of time it takes to get around at a given amount offorce). So for yourself, take a string with a weight around it andswing it over your head. Now while trying to swing it just as hard, grab the string in the middle. Thestring will spin alot faster. Sincehorsepower in an engine is really a measure of an engines ability to gain RPM, a shorter rod(string) will enable it to spinfaster. This is all purely theoretical. You can generally get any engine to spin any RPM if you can get enough fuel and air in there.If you couldn'tpeople would never have thrown rods past there redline. Modern engines justhave better computer controled rev limiters.
ajoyce76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustang0291
5.0L General Discussion
6
10-12-2015 07:55 AM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: 5.0 vs 4.6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.