4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Header...full or mid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2004, 04:57 AM
  #1  
Marc_03GT
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Marc_03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 80
Default Header...full or mid?



Got yet another question for you all here at mustang land. </P>


What would you recomend...Full length headers from BBK or Mid length headers from Bassani? Give me both a "bets bang for your buck" and whats better power wise.</P>


Also some comparisons onX vs H pipes would be nice.</P>


I'm leaning towards Bassani mid headers, x-pipe, and cat backs. </P>
Marc_03GT is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 02:06 PM
  #2  
hotrodman
I ♥ Acer
 
hotrodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,045
Default Header...full or mid?

long tubes for max. power.
hotrodman is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 03:36 PM
  #3  
USAMuscle
4th Gear Member
 
USAMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,404
Default Header...full or mid?

BBK long tubes. They cost a little more but you get much better results than mid-length headers. More torque and a nicer sound.
USAMuscle is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 03:37 PM
  #4  
Black Horse
3rd Gear Member
 
Black Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 751
Default Header...full or mid?

Long tubes as noted above <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0">
Black Horse is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HT
Carolina Regional Chapter
11
08-27-2016 08:19 PM
ctgreddy
Street/Strip
13
10-14-2015 09:05 PM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
09-14-2015 04:18 PM
Webster454
2005-2014 Mustangs
1
09-07-2015 04:59 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
4
08-21-2015 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: Header...full or mid?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.