4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

GT + Challenger pics (56K no way)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008, 03:05 PM
  #31  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

If i got a challenger it would deff be white with a 6 speed and black interior! nice car!
boduke0220 is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 03:48 PM
  #32  
SHO NO MERCY
4th Gear Member
 
SHO NO MERCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,131
Default

While challenger's are nice cars they're starting to come off a lot like the charger. Heavy, expensive, and I doubt very many people that buy them will every actually do anything to it aside from wheels and a system. I think the new Camaro will be the exact same way. I would like to start a thread on this to see if anyone else feels the same way. The more packed muscle cars come with creature features and auto transmissions the less inclined companies are going to be to making aftermarket parts. Plus, I can't imagine how much a set of headers or a cat-back would be for a Challenger. It's all about what you're into.

None the less, great looking challenger. I like the white better then the competition orange.
SHO NO MERCY is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 04:42 PM
  #33  
98MustangGT46
5th Gear Member
 
98MustangGT46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Norton, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,166
Default

I want one so bad. Great looking cars.
98MustangGT46 is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 03:14 AM
  #34  
froggerlives07
1st Gear Member
 
froggerlives07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 114
Default

This is the first time seeing the new challenger.
froggerlives07 is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 04:02 AM
  #35  
Hlistr_07RR
I always jizz first
 
Hlistr_07RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 967
Default

Originally Posted by jrherald420
ummmmm he said the 69 camaro and the 2010 camaro dont look alike not the challenger
Uhh, what do you think the pictures were of?
Hlistr_07RR is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 07:44 AM
  #36  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

I like!!!
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 11:14 AM
  #37  
Furinox
4th Gear Member
 
Furinox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,667
Default

I like the way they look a lot. I will keep my car though, especially since it its much faster.
Furinox is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 03:20 PM
  #38  
jrherald420
5th Gear Member
 
jrherald420's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 4,524
Default

Originally Posted by Hlistr_07RR
Uhh, what do you think the pictures were of?


well when he first posted the pictures he had them wrong if you look he edited his post seconds after i pointed that out!! thats why i said that.
jrherald420 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uberstang1
4.6L General Discussion
67
12-07-2017 07:10 AM
McLeary
New Member Area
9
03-14-2016 07:50 PM
9550
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
10
10-26-2015 05:01 PM
heslekrants
Street/Strip
11
09-23-2015 04:02 PM
Oak
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
09-14-2015 03:08 PM



Quick Reply: GT + Challenger pics (56K no way)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.