4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Stupid cam numbers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2009, 05:02 PM
  #1  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default Stupid cam numbers!

Hey guys can you help me out with these cams? I don't really know what the letters mean.

What do you think is the best cam for me. I want somthing with a lopy idle but i don't necessarily want new springs cuz thats another 200 dollars lol. I was lookin at the XE274H?

But i know you guys probably get this all the time...but if you could help thatd be nice.
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:09 PM
  #2  
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
defconfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,791
Default

If your dead set on not getting valve springs, and your a conservative driver who doesn't see redline every time you take your car out, you could go with Hitech stage II's they still have a lot of lope and claim you dont need vavlesprings unless your are spending a prolonged amount of time at higher rpms.
defconfire is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:21 PM
  #3  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

Yea i listend to the video and thats the kind of idle i want. Thanks alot defcon...is hi tech reliable?
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:52 PM
  #4  
stang04chris
2nd Gear Member
 
stang04chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tx
Posts: 329
Default

there is a guy on youtube with bolt ons, a built rear, slicks and hi tech stage 2 and runs 12.1 in the 1/4
stang04chris is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:16 PM
  #5  
lilmarc1988
2nd Gear Member
 
lilmarc1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 309
Default

i talked to him on aim, he got new valve springs and shifts at like 6500 rpms though
lilmarc1988 is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:32 PM
  #6  
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
defconfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,791
Default

I saw the video for that the car, it launches pretty hard and had some big sticky tires. im guessing that helped alot
defconfire is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:44 PM
  #7  
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
01GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 5,726
Default

Originally Posted by defconfire
I saw the video for that the car, it launches pretty hard and had some big sticky tires. im guessing that helped alot
no, a hard launch on slicks doesn't help at all.
01GT4.6 is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:50 PM
  #8  
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
JayC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by 01GT4.6
no, a hard launch on slicks doesn't help at all.
Of course the fact the car weighs 3100# with the driver has nothing to do with it either. It's all in those cams. lol
JayC is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:52 PM
  #9  
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
defconfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,791
Default

^ Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking, a hard launch sticky tires an a light curb weight helping down the 1/4 mile.

Anyways here's the link to the video, its kinda long so you could skip the intro.
defconfire is offline  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:56 PM
  #10  
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
JayC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by defconfire
^ Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking, a hard launch sticky tires an a light curb weight helping down the 1/4 mile.

Anyways here's the link to the video, its kinda long so you could skip the intro.
You're excused since you can't drive in a straight line.
JayC is offline  


Quick Reply: Stupid cam numbers!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.