4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

My engine build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2009, 06:39 PM
  #11  
mustangman03
3rd Gear Member
 
mustangman03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 621
Default

while were on machine shops what all should you get done to one, also would it be cheaper to buy a short block im getting ready to do the samething if you buy a new shortblock from mmr or somewhere like that do thye flycut their pistons also does anyone know anything about KT Engines in Charlotte NC i think i said it all.
mustangman03 is offline  
Old 04-01-2009, 06:48 PM
  #12  
Quicktime_GT
5th Gear Member
 
Quicktime_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,406
Default

are the teskid blocks stouter than a iron block?
Quicktime_GT is offline  
Old 04-01-2009, 07:11 PM
  #13  
jvog
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jvog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2,825
Default

Originally Posted by Quicktime_GT
are the teskid blocks stouter than a iron block?
Yea. Supposedly they hold 1500 hp
jvog is offline  
Old 04-01-2009, 07:28 PM
  #14  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Teksid blocks were made in Italy by the same engine manufacturer as Ferrari gets their motors from. They are waaaaay better than iron blocks.
teej281 is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 01:25 PM
  #15  
Mustang_NTriangle
5th Gear Member
 
Mustang_NTriangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 2,402
Default

Originally Posted by lizzyfan
Give Matt a call, he knows a few. Make sure you get pistons flycut
You don't need to flycut pistons if you go with CMS 2.5 blower cams.
Mustang_NTriangle is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 01:29 PM
  #16  
Fobra
Banned
 
Fobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,064
Default

Originally Posted by Quicktime_GT
are the teskid blocks stouter than a iron block?
never seen a real world differences other than nominal weight... and higher cost both to machine and purchase
Fobra is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:09 PM
  #17  
jvog
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jvog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2,825
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang_NTriangle
You don't need to flycut pistons if you go with CMS 2.5 blower cams.
Really? If that's the case than why would I pay for it if I don't have to?
jvog is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:31 PM
  #18  
Furinox
4th Gear Member
 
Furinox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,667
Default

Not sure if the 2v stuff is different when it comes to piston cc>compression ratios but if they are the same then those pistons have waaaay too much of a dish for running a centri blower. I went with 11 cc pistons which gave me a 9:1 comp ratio and I now wish I would have gone with a 9.5.
Furinox is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 04:59 PM
  #19  
jvog
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jvog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2,825
Default

Yea 4v is different than 2v. My compression should be around 8.8 with my 2v heads.
jvog is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 08:51 AM
  #20  
Furinox
4th Gear Member
 
Furinox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,667
Default

Go at least 9.5 or your going to make quite a bit less power compared to what you did with a stock motor and same boost levels.
Furinox is offline  


Quick Reply: My engine build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.