The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang > 4.6L General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2009, 03:21 PM   #21
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,777
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

Since these heads are thus far, so good, wouldn't it be an upgrade even for the 4v guys because of the better flowing numbers, springs and less reciprocating mass?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 03:28 PM   #22
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
defconfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: '99 Mustang GT
Location: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,662
Default

I would go ahead and say it probably not an upgrade for the 4v guys. This is likely a fairly heavily cammed car.. 99-01 cobras can get to the 320 rwhp range with full boltons and with cams can hit around ~370-380 rwhp.

Besides the 4v's tend to make much more linear power than the 2v's which can be good for some applications.

I'd say if you have a 4v keep it a 4v and just add some cams if you still want more n/a power.
__________________

Patriot Heads
CMS stage 1 Cams
Bolt-ons
Griggs Built Road Race Suspension

For Sale: - ::SOLD:: -

Current Ride: Showroom Stock 2002 Electron Blue Z06
-I wanted the LSX without the F-body attached-

Last edited by defconfire; 07-03-2009 at 03:39 PM.
defconfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 03:37 PM   #23
Aereon
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Vehicle: 03 GT
Location: SF Bay.
Posts: 2,309
Send a message via AIM to Aereon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt View Post
compared to any other 2v head i'd say its amazing.
It's an unported head with no supporting cams is whats amazing about those gains.
__________________


Big corral, very few horses.
Aereon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 03:46 PM   #24
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,777
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

I just asked what he means by "ported" and if he had stock valves. If it's a home port and stock valves then those numbers are less impressive. Good catch Aer
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 04:11 PM   #25
mrsinister2424
2nd Gear Member
 
mrsinister2424's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang GT
Location: CA
Posts: 492
Default

Results are impressive, but it says the original setup with ported pi heads was taken all the way up to run 18.... Why the hell would they need 18 runs to get an average baseline hp/tq measurement.

Just looks fishy because after the swap its on run 3. More than likely the car was already tuned to the ported heads. Maybe they loosened up the tune a bunch to give a more impressive readout?
__________________

99' Rio Red Mustang GT:
Summit O/R H, MAC Flowpaths w/Turndowns, BBK Shorty Headers, Steeda UDP, K&N intake, MGW STS, Diablosport Delta chip, BBK 75mm throttle body, Trickflow upper plenum, H&R SS springs, Cross drilled & slotted rotors, "Functional" hood scoop

Life= eat, lift, eat, eat, eat, sleep, repeat
mrsinister2424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 04:14 PM   #26
01GT4.6
Moderator
2001 Ford Mustang
 
01GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2001 Mustang GT
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 5,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aereon View Post
It's an unported head with no supporting cams is whats amazing about those gains.
what do you mean by no supporting cams? The car had Comp 278's I believe, if so that's a pretty aggressive cam.
01GT4.6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 05:48 PM   #27
doughboy4.6
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01GT4.6 View Post
what do you mean by no supporting cams? The car had Comp 278's I believe, if so that's a pretty aggressive cam.
Yes 278s are aggressive for ported pi heads but still only have 550 lift. With the new heads they can take 600 lift easy
__________________

Vortech with to much to list 555rwhp
doughboy4.6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 05:59 PM   #28
01GT4.6
Moderator
2001 Ford Mustang
 
01GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 2001 Mustang GT
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 5,324
Default

oh okay then
01GT4.6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 07:09 PM   #29
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsinister2424 View Post
Results are impressive, but it says the original setup with ported pi heads was taken all the way up to run 18.... Why the hell would they need 18 runs to get an average baseline hp/tq measurement.

Just looks fishy because after the swap its on run 3. More than likely the car was already tuned to the ported heads. Maybe they loosened up the tune a bunch to give a more impressive readout?
The car is run in the American Iron series and is handicapped by power to weight. Therefore it was tuned or de-tuned to make 305rwhp for it's race weight. So we can figure the original combo could/should make more than 305 rwhp. Also the heads raised the compression ratio one full point. That in itself will give good hp and torque gains. So in my opinion we still have no "real world" results at this time. MD is in the business of selling products such as the TF head and we know results can be manipulated very easily.
__________________
SCT tuned by Greg @ Speedy Dyno
12.51 @ 108 w/ CMS stage II cams
11.35 @ 120 NX
JayC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 11:56 PM   #30
teej281
5th Gear Member
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 2,664
Default

For a fully built 2v to put down only 305rwhp and 316rwtq isnt that great. And to gain 50rwhp over that number by just doing these heads id say is impressive. And the fact that the power starts out the same and grows gradually over the entire rpm band says a lot about these heads that they dont just make peak power but broaden the hp and torque curve overall which is an awesome feat in my opinon. I would like to see a direct swap from completely stock to these heads and some custom grind cams to see how the power curve and drivability would be affected by these things. I always had extreme faith in these heads and I think after seeing these results, I feel I was right.
__________________
2002 Mustang GT Conv: PYPES O/R X, Flowmaster catback, JLT cold air intake, FRPP 4.10's, Xcal 3, Strange 10 way Shocks and Struts, Eibach Pro-Kit, UPR C/C Plates, and Steeda Tri-Ax with Hurst black ball shift knob, 03/04 Cobra bumper....250rwhp, 263rwtq(with slipping clutch)
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
25, 2v, 38, blower, built, cams, cc, cms, forum, heads, holy, mustang, numbers, results, stage, trickflow

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company