The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang > 4.6L General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-13-2009, 07:29 PM   #1
0949er
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT
Location: NC
Posts: 523
Default car responds better to 100+ octane?

Myth or what? I just (in the name of science) filled my empty tank with 100+ octane (5.99/gallon ) to see if my car would react/run any better then regular 93 octane.

Now, don't get me wrong, I don't see how 7 octane would make any difference in performance (I'm not saying putting race gas in my car give me extra 30 HPZZZ LOLZZ), but with all my mods (esp. the cams) do you think that the higher octane helps the cams out any w/ power? I THINK I felt a difference in TQ, but I'm not positive. The car seemed to pull a tiny bit harder when I was on it.

Am I crazy?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

MODS:
Comp Cam Stage 2's (XE 270AH)
BBK LT's
MAC O/R Prochamber
Borla Stingers
JLT Cold Air
4:10's
288 wrhp / 310 wrtq (Tune by Pro-Dyno.net)
"Supercharger Turbonator Stage 2"


NEW VIDEOS!!!
In Progress:
Vortech V-1 T-Trim 60% Parts, 0% Install
0949er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 08:09 PM   #2
99BlackPonyGT
aka Negative Nancy
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1999 Mustang GT
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,022
Send a message via AIM to 99BlackPonyGT
Default

unless the car is tuned for 100 octane, it wont perform better...it will probably perform worse, you only need to run the minimum octane you can run without detonating...thats why i think people are dumb when they have a stock car that calls for 87 and they put 94 in it because its "the good gas"...guy in my high school put 110 octane into a stock dodge neon and it blew sky high...not sure if it was related to the gas or coincidence, but i wouldnt put 100 octane in my car without being tuned for it...
99BlackPonyGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 08:26 PM   #3
mustangman03
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Vehicle: 03 Cobra & 03 GT
Location: SC
Posts: 570
Default

You just wasted $80 no offense the octane rating is the fuel ability to resist knocking (detenation) if you dont have really high compression or a tune there is no need to run a higher octane unless the vehicle calls for it. if you have a 93 octane tune you need to run 93 octane. if your car calls for 87 octane run 87. There is no benefit to running a higher octane fuel win its not needed it is a waste of fuel because the unburned just goes out the exhaust. However it will not hurt anything unless you have a vehicle that calls for a higher octane and you put a lower octane fuel instead
__________________
03 GT (Daily Driver)

03 Cobra 10th Anniversary (Weekend Cruzer)
mustangman03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 08:55 PM   #4
0949er
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang GT
Location: NC
Posts: 523
Default

well, like I said, I wasn't really expecting anything to happen.

BUT

It sure does smell good (really, it smells different then 93)
__________________

MODS:
Comp Cam Stage 2's (XE 270AH)
BBK LT's
MAC O/R Prochamber
Borla Stingers
JLT Cold Air
4:10's
288 wrhp / 310 wrtq (Tune by Pro-Dyno.net)
"Supercharger Turbonator Stage 2"


NEW VIDEOS!!!
In Progress:
Vortech V-1 T-Trim 60% Parts, 0% Install
0949er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 09:01 PM   #5
ZW99GT
Moderator
 
ZW99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Vehicle: 1999 GT
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,769
Default

It's all in your head. But race gas sure does smell good.
__________________
Stock 351W
ZW99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 09:25 PM   #6
justinschmidt1
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 96, Gt
Location: Delawere
Posts: 408
Default

no point in running 100 octane without the car being tuned for it....
__________________
03 alum. Pi motor, v2 s-trim @ 11 psi, full exhaust, built 4r70w with 3800 stall, 3100 lb curb weight. 385 rwhp



justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 09:34 PM   #7
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
2000 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Mustang GT
Posts: 3,380
Default

well, yes and no, it actually will respond to it, as long as you're running a catted exhaust system with the O2 sensors still plugged in.

100 octane burns slower, so it would essentially trick your cars computer into thinking that it was running rich, so the computer would lean out the fuel trim a little (NOT at WOT, only at partial throttle) so that you're using less.

There's a limit to how big of a difference it will make though, I think 93 octane is about the point where it is no longer efficient to get higher octane for better mileage
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdot9 View Post
i could go for a nice can of cock rite now actually...
2000AZ5.0GT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 09:43 PM   #8
blackGTcp
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,117
Default

Dont mean to steal but are mach 1's tuned for 93? Thats what ive been putting in and thats what the guy before me did
__________________


2004 Mach 1
blackGTcp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 10:25 PM   #9
lizzyfan
Made Moderator
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 98 GT Blumurder
Location: Helaware
Posts: 11,538
Default

Ooooo, that smell!!!
__________________

Tuned by Matt at Performance Evolution
432 rwhp
426 tq

DD-2008 Mazda3 Zoom Zoom!
1996-Ranger (AKA "Barney") RIP 305K!
lizzyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 10:45 PM   #10
justinschmidt1
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 96, Gt
Location: Delawere
Posts: 408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lizzyfan View Post
Ooooo, that smell!!!
haha my dad was singing that today
__________________
03 alum. Pi motor, v2 s-trim @ 11 psi, full exhaust, built 4r70w with 3800 stall, 3100 lb curb weight. 385 rwhp



justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
100, 2003, bad, car, ford, forums, gt, high, mach, mustang, octane, put, requirements, sensor, specs, stock

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company