The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang > 4.6L General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-2009, 04:26 PM   #11
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,778
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

We don't play with minimum numbers here Cliff, lol. j/p

Op and anyone looking to ever "eventually" go up in power; Always by the maximum injector you think you'll ever think you'll need and if you're not up to the 60#ers then make the leap to the 60's. lol

Brand new they are about $330 but you wont have to buy injectors again.

Unless you supply fuel the right ($$) way the 42's are going to run out before 450rw.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 05:28 PM   #12
sainthk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 99 Mustang GT
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 262
Default

Sxynerd,
So let say you buy 60lb injectors, you only use what you need and not the whole 60lbs? and i'm guessing thats why you need a re-tune so the comp knows what to support?
__________________

Auto 99GT (35th ann),BBk Cia 3:73's,BBk76mm tb BBK Plenum,MAC LT's,MAC Prochamber,Port and Polished the stock heads,Flowmasters,Steeda UDP,160 therm,XCAL 3,Tuned,Tranny rebui
sainthk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 05:30 PM   #13
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,778
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sainthk View Post
Sxynerd,
So let say you buy 60lb injectors, you only use what you need and not the whole 60lbs? and i'm guessing thats why you need a re-tune so the comp knows what to support?
Essentially that's right. It's a little more complicated but yeah you only tune in what you need.
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 05:34 PM   #14
sainthk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 99 Mustang GT
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 262
Default

Alright I get it now, Thanks for the info.
__________________

Auto 99GT (35th ann),BBk Cia 3:73's,BBk76mm tb BBK Plenum,MAC LT's,MAC Prochamber,Port and Polished the stock heads,Flowmasters,Steeda UDP,160 therm,XCAL 3,Tuned,Tranny rebui
sainthk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 06:52 PM   #15
cliffyk
5th Gear Member
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,267
Default

Injectors can be too big, and for any n/a application 60lb/h would be too big (30lb/h are adequate for any n/a 4.6L 2V or 4V application) as you would only be using the lower 40% to 50% of their range. This will make properly tuning idle, part throttle, and low load fueling quite difficult if not impossible.

Read Greg's book to find out more...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 07:32 PM   #16
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,778
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

I didn't think of that cliff, damn sure glad you're here. Do the math for us Cliff, at what point should a person who's going to eventually make more power step into 60's? It's very possible to hit the 280-300 mark with stock injectors but at those numbers 60's would still be in range to tune, correct? buying 42's is a waist if you're going to ever want to make more than 450 without converting to higher flow fuel lines. (Since the pumps usually isn't the poop factor)
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 09:15 PM   #17
cliffyk
5th Gear Member
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sxynerd View Post
I didn't think of that cliff, damn sure glad you're here. Do the math for us Cliff, at what point should a person who's going to eventually make more power step into 60's? It's very possible to hit the 280-300 mark with stock injectors but at those numbers 60's would still be in range to tune, correct? buying 42's is a waist if you're going to ever want to make more than 450 without converting to higher flow fuel lines. (Since the pumps usually isn't the poop factor)
Injectors should always be selected so that their fuel delivery, at 75% to 85% duty cycle, matches the engine's peak HP--if the maximum duty cycle is much less than 70% you will have fuel control problems at idle and low loads, much more than 90% and you are flirting with their going static at high rpms and loads.

Here's a table showing what the ranges are for some common injector ratings for our cars:



The formula is:


This is similar to MAF sizing in that MAF selection also needs to be made so that the engine's air flow requirements will cover 85% to 90% of the MAFs total range. If a MAF is too small it will "peg" and stop reporting any further flow increases (can you say LEAN!), if it's too large you will only be using a small portion of the lower part of the total air flow range the MAF can support.

Here's a chart of the flow bench data we got when testing the OEM MAF from my car:


We ran it right up to the bench's limit, you can see that at the low end there's a lot of change in output voltage for small changes in air flow (a good thing for idling and low loads).

However at the high end, at greater than 5.0V output, there is little change in voltage for big changes in flow. This is bad for any sort of precise fuel control in the range above 5.0V out (BTW, it's the PCM that imposes the 5V limit, the MAF will output higher voltages as you can see).

99.44% of difficult/impossible fueling related tuning issues are due to improper injector and/or MAF sizing.

It's true that by playing with the low and high injector slopes, injector breakpoint, and the MAF transfer function almost any combination within reason can be made to run. But if you seriously undersize injectors or MAFs you'll reach their upper limits before being properly tuned--and if you oversize them you'll be operating over only a small portion of their usable range, limiting the resolution of their use.

Add a so-called "calibrated" MAF with an unknown, goofy, not-even-close to linear, transfer function and things really go to crap fast.

Hope this helps...

---------------------------------------------------
See what happens when you retire and have too much time on your hands...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang
2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
cliffyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 10:37 PM   #18
teej281
5th Gear Member
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 2,664
Default

So running around N/A, 42lbs would be the max you'd ever wanna go with hopes for the future??? What about running a really built 4v with ported cobra r heads and healthy cams???
__________________
2002 Mustang GT Conv: PYPES O/R X, Flowmaster catback, JLT cold air intake, FRPP 4.10's, Xcal 3, Strange 10 way Shocks and Struts, Eibach Pro-Kit, UPR C/C Plates, and Steeda Tri-Ax with Hurst black ball shift knob, 03/04 Cobra bumper....250rwhp, 263rwtq(with slipping clutch)
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 11:23 PM   #19
Black_GT_02
3rd Gear Member
2002 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Black_GT_02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Vehicle: 2002 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Purdue/NW Ohio
Posts: 886
Send a message via AIM to Black_GT_02
Default

I plan on circa 550rwhp next summer. I'm on 42lb injectors now. Would I be okay just upgrading my fuel rails?
__________________
Procharged/Intercooled etc...
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3023059
Black_GT_02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 11:41 PM   #20
sxynerd
6th Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: Stock 96 GT
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 9,778
Send a message via AIM to sxynerd Send a message via Yahoo to sxynerd
Default

I always love asking cliff to explain or elaborate on an idea. Thanks Cliff. Not only is it technical, it's understandable. Why don't you rewrite Banish's book? LOL
sxynerd is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
21lb, 42, 60, 75, cams, change, ford, injector, injectors, lb, lbs, mustang, psi, upgrade

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company