Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang > 4.6L General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2011, 08:44 AM   #21
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,280
TJ Brillhart
Default

Do not run drag radials on your IRS! If anything find an extra 2 v6 wheels and throw some slicks on them if you want to run. IRS+DR's=broken half shafts every time.

Back to the issue at hand. I think its all in the 60' and the spinning after shifts thats hurting you. Spinning will add MPH but hurt ET. Its been proven many times. Also, clutch slipping is probably the reason for the slower 60'. Plus tires could have been "newer" and bit better back 2 years ago. Overall, I think your car is still performing the same, just the clutch might have seen its better days and the tires might not be as grippy as they were. Track prep too is also a concern to check into.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________





Member of Team IRS-GT #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleIcedGT View Post
Saying there is a 1whp difference between the X and H and trying to justify it as a performance difference, is like walking 100 feet to your car and eating a cheeseburger while saying its fine because you just did "cardio".
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 11:43 AM   #22
Moonshine
5th Gear Member
 
Moonshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1998 Cobra
Location: Wa
Posts: 2,284
Collin Castaneda
Default

Teej....why is it okay to run slicks but not drag radials?
__________________

Moonshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 11:48 AM   #23
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,280
TJ Brillhart
Default

Radial means stiffer sidewall than a slick. Running full slicks give you the soft sidewall to absorb the shock of a launch. Drag radials stick great, but they have a radial sidewall which is still stiff and shocks the halfshafts hard on a launch, contributing to their failure.
__________________





Member of Team IRS-GT #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleIcedGT View Post
Saying there is a 1whp difference between the X and H and trying to justify it as a performance difference, is like walking 100 feet to your car and eating a cheeseburger while saying its fine because you just did "cardio".
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:00 PM   #24
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 1997 Mustang GT, 2002 F150 XLT 4x4 Triton
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,427
MustangSVT97r
Send a message via AIM to uberstang1 Send a message via Yahoo to uberstang1
Default

Slicks will kill irs halfshafts fast as well, i got 3 terminators drivers berween 470 and 520 and a tow truck driver to attest to it.
__________________
Street Car, 4v D1sc, 20psi,viper spec t56, Team Z/ UPR suspension.
SKELETON CREW RACING
uberstang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:05 PM   #25
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,280
TJ Brillhart
Default

Well if there is an issue with the half shaft before putting the slicks on it will break. But you'll have less chance breaking with a slick.
__________________





Member of Team IRS-GT #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleIcedGT View Post
Saying there is a 1whp difference between the X and H and trying to justify it as a performance difference, is like walking 100 feet to your car and eating a cheeseburger while saying its fine because you just did "cardio".
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:25 PM   #26
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 1997 Mustang GT, 2002 F150 XLT 4x4 Triton
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,427
MustangSVT97r
Send a message via AIM to uberstang1 Send a message via Yahoo to uberstang1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teej281 View Post
Well if there is an issue with the half shaft before putting the slicks on it will break. But you'll have less chance breaking with a slick.
May be less chance but it still a good chance of failure regardless especially with high hp. A 400 hp car with irs has the same axle failure rate as a 500rwhp car woth a 28 spline SRA, both woth equivent tires
__________________
Street Car, 4v D1sc, 20psi,viper spec t56, Team Z/ UPR suspension.
SKELETON CREW RACING
uberstang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:32 PM   #27
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT Convertible
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,280
TJ Brillhart
Default

There are guys running 9's on stock half shafts with 700rwhp on slicks...
__________________





Member of Team IRS-GT #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleIcedGT View Post
Saying there is a 1whp difference between the X and H and trying to justify it as a performance difference, is like walking 100 feet to your car and eating a cheeseburger while saying its fine because you just did "cardio".
teej281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:37 PM   #28
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 1997 Mustang GT, 2002 F150 XLT 4x4 Triton
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,427
MustangSVT97r
Send a message via AIM to uberstang1 Send a message via Yahoo to uberstang1
Default

Another thing that makes me further disagree about this slap a slick on and go theorybis that for car under 300 wheel HP a full blown rinkle wall slick is probably to much tire forthe power level which means your reall gonna have to come off the line hard and high in the rpm range so u dont bog it out which honestly maybe more stress than coming off the softer with a drag radial. I mean if you think ur gonna put a slick on a 260rwhp and come off the line at 2500 you got another thing coming.
__________________
Street Car, 4v D1sc, 20psi,viper spec t56, Team Z/ UPR suspension.
SKELETON CREW RACING
uberstang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:39 PM   #29
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 1997 Mustang GT, 2002 F150 XLT 4x4 Triton
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,427
MustangSVT97r
Send a message via AIM to uberstang1 Send a message via Yahoo to uberstang1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teej281 View Post
There are guys running 9's on stock half shafts with 700rwhp on slicks...
Im sure there is, i can also read on the internet people running 9s on a horrible stock chevy 10 bolt. My 3 examples are from first hand expereince of friends cars at the track not what some guy managed to get away with on the internet, just saying. I think your JDM roots are showing a little Teej dont take offense.
__________________
Street Car, 4v D1sc, 20psi,viper spec t56, Team Z/ UPR suspension.
SKELETON CREW RACING

Last edited by uberstang1; 06-27-2011 at 12:42 PM.
uberstang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:59 PM   #30
turbo232
4th Gear Member
 
turbo232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Vehicle: 2004 Mustang
Location: GA
Posts: 1,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teej281 View Post
There are guys running 9's on stock half shafts with 700rwhp on slicks...
yeah...but if they are running autos that absorbs some of the shock as well.
__________________
former 02 Turbo V6 Mustang 276 rwhp and 299 lb-ft torque. SOLD....then TOTALED.
current 04 GT Vert too slow.
242 rwhp and 253 lb-ft torque with new intake manifold
10 guns owned = 0 shooting sprees.
2011 Subaru Impreza replaced the GT.

turbo232 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 12:59 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
12s, 14, 18, 1995, 87, beat, car, edge, forums, gt, mustang, slow, slower, time, trapping

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup