Many Don't Know Me
05-03-2012, 07:43 AM
#11
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
That PSI reading sounds high, with a 3.6 pulley you probably only saw 7-8 PSI.
Either way, sounds about right for an auto.
My buds car with the same 3.6 pulley and a manual made 357 rwhp.
I was running a intercooler an a 3.15 pulley making about 10-11 psi with an si trim and my car made 370s- 384 rwhp was the max it ever laid down through the auto with that setup. obviously the car ran very well so its not all about the dyno
Either way, sounds about right for an auto.
My buds car with the same 3.6 pulley and a manual made 357 rwhp.
I was running a intercooler an a 3.15 pulley making about 10-11 psi with an si trim and my car made 370s- 384 rwhp was the max it ever laid down through the auto with that setup. obviously the car ran very well so its not all about the dyno
05-03-2012, 02:51 PM
#12
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 655
05-03-2012, 09:17 PM
#14
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 1,956
What was his fuel system? Long tubes?
Seeing those numbers makes me feel very hopeful about my goals. I'm hoping to possibly see 600RWHP out of my setup with Stage III heads, 75MM TB, Stage II-III cams and 16 PSI out of my blower. I know thats a tall order and my builder felt pretty certain I had no chance at that. Either way i'm gonna have a tune setup to try to spray my way up to 600RWHP if I don't make it(methanol). My auto and little blower will probly stop me from hitting the goal though.
05-04-2012, 10:36 AM
#15
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: sttesuhcaxaT (The State you love to hate)
Posts: 1,360
05-04-2012, 10:43 AM
#16
That PSI reading sounds high, with a 3.6 pulley you probably only saw 7-8 PSI.
Either way, sounds about right for an auto.
My buds car with the same 3.6 pulley and a manual made 357 rwhp.
I was running a intercooler an a 3.15 pulley making about 10-11 psi with an si trim and my car made 370s- 384 rwhp was the max it ever laid down through the auto with that setup. obviously the car ran very well so its not all about the dyno
Either way, sounds about right for an auto.
My buds car with the same 3.6 pulley and a manual made 357 rwhp.
I was running a intercooler an a 3.15 pulley making about 10-11 psi with an si trim and my car made 370s- 384 rwhp was the max it ever laid down through the auto with that setup. obviously the car ran very well so its not all about the dyno
05-04-2012, 11:18 AM
#17
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Was that on a 2V? I assume so. Thats pretty damn nice I like to hear that, but a D1 is a bad mawfuka. Why get a D1 for a 2V? Cant that thing spin to like 30 PSI? I don't see any 2V gobbling up 30 PSI of air.
What was his fuel system? Long tubes?
Seeing those numbers makes me feel very hopeful about my goals. I'm hoping to possibly see 600RWHP out of my setup with Stage III heads, 75MM TB, Stage II-III cams and 16 PSI out of my blower. I know thats a tall order and my builder felt pretty certain I had no chance at that. Either way i'm gonna have a tune setup to try to spray my way up to 600RWHP if I don't make it(methanol). My auto and little blower will probly stop me from hitting the goal though.
What was his fuel system? Long tubes?
Seeing those numbers makes me feel very hopeful about my goals. I'm hoping to possibly see 600RWHP out of my setup with Stage III heads, 75MM TB, Stage II-III cams and 16 PSI out of my blower. I know thats a tall order and my builder felt pretty certain I had no chance at that. Either way i'm gonna have a tune setup to try to spray my way up to 600RWHP if I don't make it(methanol). My auto and little blower will probly stop me from hitting the goal though.
That was with a v2 blower stock shortblock and blower cams in the stock heads. Since its a bullitt the factory bullitt intake. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...d-today-2.html
05-04-2012, 11:40 AM
#18
6th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,448
Was that on a 2V? I assume so. Thats pretty damn nice I like to hear that, but a D1 is a bad mawfuka. Why get a D1 for a 2V? Cant that thing spin to like 30 PSI? I don't see any 2V gobbling up 30 PSI of air.
What was his fuel system? Long tubes?
Seeing those numbers makes me feel very hopeful about my goals. I'm hoping to possibly see 600RWHP out of my setup with Stage III heads, 75MM TB, Stage II-III cams and 16 PSI out of my blower. I know thats a tall order and my builder felt pretty certain I had no chance at that. Either way i'm gonna have a tune setup to try to spray my way up to 600RWHP if I don't make it(methanol). My auto and little blower will probly stop me from hitting the goal though.
What was his fuel system? Long tubes?
Seeing those numbers makes me feel very hopeful about my goals. I'm hoping to possibly see 600RWHP out of my setup with Stage III heads, 75MM TB, Stage II-III cams and 16 PSI out of my blower. I know thats a tall order and my builder felt pretty certain I had no chance at that. Either way i'm gonna have a tune setup to try to spray my way up to 600RWHP if I don't make it(methanol). My auto and little blower will probly stop me from hitting the goal though.
He had my stock heads ported by my friend(probably the best head porter in the country), TFS intake also ported, CMS stage 2.5 blower cams, forged bottom end, longtubes, catback. He had 1 gt40 pump and a (bandaid) boost a pump.
If he ever spends more then 4 months in country he is going to upgrade his fuel system and pulleys and shoot for 750rwhp.
05-07-2012, 10:59 AM
#19
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 655
Well got my car back and it felt good until it popped a code. I don't know why I didn't see these issues before I got it. The IAT sensor built in to my original MAF I need to rewire to the the discharge dude.
